General and Maladaptive Traits in a Five-Factor Framework for DSM-5 in a University Student Sample

Assessment - Tập 20 Số 3 - Trang 295-307 - 2013
Filip De Fruyt1, Barbara De Clercq2, Bart Wille2, Kristian E. Markon3, Robert F. Krueger4
1Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
2#N#1Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
3#N# 2University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
4#N# 3University of Minnesota, MN, USA

Tóm tắt

The relationships between two measures proposed to describe personality pathology, that is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-3) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), are examined in an undergraduate sample ( N = 240). The NEO inventories are general trait measures, also considered relevant to assess disordered personality, whereas the PID-5 measure is specifically designed to assess pathological personality traits, as conceptualized in the DSM-5 proposal. A structural analysis of the 25 PID-5 traits confirmed the factor structure observed in the U.S. derivation sample, with higher order factors of Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. A joint factor analysis of, respectively, the NEO domains and their facets with the PID-5 traits showed that general and maladaptive traits are subsumed under an umbrella of five to six major dimensions that can be interpreted from the perspective of the five-factor model or the Personality Psychopathology Five. Implications for the assessment of personality pathology and the construction of models of psychopathology grounded in personality are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association, 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4

10.1177/1073191112471141

Clark L. A., 1993, Manual for the Schedule for Non-adaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP)

10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200

Cloninger C. R., 1994, The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use

10.1037/a0021212

Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory and Five-Factor Inventory professional manual

10.1037/a0020264

10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322

10.1037/a0027742

10.1177/1073191109333760

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00382.x

10.1177/107319110000700403

10.1177/1073191111408228

10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_14

10.1037/a0025830

Harkness A. R., 1994, Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, 291

10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104

Haven S., 1977, Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study

Hoekstra H. A., 2013, NEO-PI-3 Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst

Hoekstra H. A., 1996, NEO PI-R en NEO-FFI: Big Five Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten

10.1177/1088868310361240

10.1037/a0026656

10.1080/14789949.2010.511242

10.1521/pedi.2005.19.3.233

10.1017/S0033291711002674.

10.1037/a0018990

10.1521/pedi.2006.20.6.645

Livesley W. J., 1990, Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology–Basic Questionnaire

10.1037/a0021146

10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139

10.1037/a0019227

10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_05

10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552

10.1177/1073191105280987

10.1521/pedi.2008.22.5.433

10.1521/pedi.16.3.215.22541

10.1177/1073191106286748

Muthén L. K., 1998, MPlus user’s guide, 6

10.3758/BF03200807

10.1037/a0015368

10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002

10.1016/j.cpr.2002.09.001

10.1177/1073191110394772

10.1037/a0025905

10.1177/1073191112457589

10.1521/pedi.2010.24.4.412

10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.350

10.1007/BF02293557

10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00531.x

10.1037/13939-000

10.1037/10423-025

10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153542

10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628

Widiger T. A., 2006, Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00977.x

10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71

10.1037/10423-006

10.1037/a0027669

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Assessment

Tập 20 Số 3

295-307

Thông tin tác giả