Gender-related differences in the risk factors for repeat stone surgery

Urolithiasis - Tập 49 - Trang 471-476 - 2021
Viacheslav Iremashvili1, S. Li1, S. L. Dresner1, S. L. Best1, S. P. Hedican1, S. Y. Nakada1
1Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation Centennial Building, Madison, USA

Tóm tắt

Our objective was to analyze and compare the associations between potential risk factors for nephrolithiasis and repeat stone surgery in male and female patients. We retrospectively analyzed 1970 patients who had stone surgery at our institution in the period from January 2009 to May 2017, were older than 18 years and had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Our definition of surgical recurrence included repeat surgery on the same renal unit or on the opposite renal unit if the original imaging did not demonstrate significant stones on that side. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression models were built for each gender. We also explored the interactions between gender and other patient’s characteristics in their effect on the risk of recurrence. Ureteroscopy was the most common treatment modality for both first (83%) and repeat (87%) procedures. Over a mean follow-up of 4.3 years (median 3.8, interquartile range 2.2–6.0), 413 (21.0%) patients had a surgical recurrence. In multivariate analyses, hypertension, diabetes, Caucasian race and younger age (less than 60 years) were significantly associated with the risk of surgical recurrence only in females. Interaction between these characteristics and gender was significant indicating a larger effect on the risk of surgical recurrence in females compared to males. Our study demonstrated a number of differences in the predictors of repeat surgery for nephrolithiasis between males and females. If confirmed by future studies these differences may be helpful for optimizing nephrolithiasis prevention efforts.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165 Lieske JC, Pena de la Vega LS, Slezak JM, Bergstralh EJ, Leibson CL, Ho KL, Gettman MT (2006) Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 69(4):760–764 Penniston KL, McLaren ID, Greenlee RT, Nakada SY (2011) Urolithiasis in a rural Wisconsin population from 1992 to 2008: narrowing of the male-to-female ratio. J Urol 185(5):1731–1736 Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293(4):455–462 Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Curhan GC (1998) Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension in women. Am J Kidney Dis 32(5):802–807 Madore F, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Curhan GC (1998) Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension. Am J Hypertens 11(1 Pt 1):46–53 Ratkalkar VN, Kleinman JG (2011) Mechanisms of Stone Formation. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 9(3–4):187–197 Fuster DG, Bobulescu IA, Zhang J, Wade J, Moe OW (2007) Characterization of the regulation of renal Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 by insulin. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292(2):F577-585 Bobulescu IA (2010) Renal lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 19(4):393–402 Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF, Kane C, Gentle DL, Bruce JE, Leslie SW (2000) Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55(6):825–830 Ramaswamy K, Shah O (2014) Metabolic syndrome and nephrolithiasis. Transl Androl Urol 3(3):285–295 Bell DS (2012) Beware the low urine pH–the major cause of the increased prevalence of nephrolithiasis in the patient with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 14(4):299–303 Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC (2005) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 68(3):1230–1235 Miano R, Germani S, Vespasiani G (2007) Stones and urinary tract infections. Urol Int 79(Suppl 1):32–36 Schwaderer AL, Wolfe AJ (2017) The association between bacteria and urinary stones. Ann Transl Med 5(2):32