Phân biệt giới trong việc phân bổ tài nguyên của hộ gia đình di cư

Journal of Population Economics - Tập 28 - Trang 565-592 - 2015
Francisca M. Antman1
1Department of Economics, University of Colorado Boulder and IZA, Boulder, USA

Tóm tắt

Bài báo này xem xét mối quan hệ giữa di cư quốc tế và phân biệt giới dưới góc độ quyền lực ra quyết định đối với việc phân bổ tài nguyên trong hộ gia đình. Tính nội sinh của di cư được giải quyết bằng chiến lược xác định theo phong cách chênh lệch trong chênh lệch và mô hình hiệu ứng cố định của hộ gia đình. Kết quả cho thấy rằng trong thời gian người đứng đầu hộ gia đình di cư vắng mặt, một tỷ lệ lớn hơn của tài nguyên được chi cho các cô gái so với các cậu bé, và người vợ của họ nắm giữ quyền ra quyết định lớn hơn. Tuy nhiên, khi người đứng đầu trở về nhà, một tỷ lệ lớn hơn của tài nguyên lại dành cho các cậu bé, và có các chứng cứ gợi ý về quyền lực lớn hơn của người đứng đầu hộ gia đình.

Từ khóa

#di cư quốc tế #phân biệt giới #quyền lực ra quyết định #phân bổ tài nguyên #hộ gia đình

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson S, Eswaran M (2009) What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. J Dev Econ 90(2):179–191 Antman FM (2014) Spousal employment and intra-household bargaining power. Appl Econ Lett 21(8):560–63 Antman FM (2013) The impact of migration on family left behind. In: Constant AF, Zimmermann KF (eds), International handbook on the economics of migration. Edward Elgar, Northampton Antman FM (2012) Gender, educational attainment and the impact of parental migration on children left behind. J Popul Econ 25(4):1187–1214 Antman FM (2011a) International migration and gender discrimination among children left behind. Amer Econ Review 101(3):645–649 Antman FM (2011b) The intergenerational effects of paternal migration on schooling and work: what can we learn from children's time allocations? J Dev Econ 96(2):200–208 Arenas E, Conroy H, Nobles J (2009) Recent trends in internal and international Mexican migration: evidence from the Mexican Family Life Survey. California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper, CCPR-2008-034 Ashraf N, Aycinena D, Martinez C, Yang D (forthcoming) Savings in transnational households: a field experiment among migrants from El Salvador. Rev Econ Stat Attanasio O, Lechene V (2002) Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Rev Econ Dyn 5:720–748 Bobonis G (2009) Is the allocation of resources within the household efficient? New evidence from a randomized experiment. J Political Econ 117(3):453–503 Campos-Vazquez RM, Lara J (2012) Self-selection patterns among return migrants: Mexico 1990–2010. IZA J Migration 1:8 Chen JJ (2013) Identifying non-cooperative behavior among spouses: child outcomes in migrant-sending households. J Dev Econ 100(1):1–18 Chen JJ (2012) Dads, disease, and death: determinants of daughter discrimination. J Pop Econ 25(1):119–149 Chen JJ (2006) Migration and imperfect monitoring: implications for intra-household allocation. Amer Econ Review 96(2):227–231 Cortes P (2013) The feminization of international migration and its effects on the children left behind: evidence from the Philippines. World Dev 65:62–78 Deaton A (1989) Looking for boy-girl discrimination in household expenditure data. World Bank Econ Rev 3(1):1–15 Duflo E (2003) Grandmothers and granddaughters: old-age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Econ Rev 17(1):1–25 Gibson J, McKenzie D, Stillman S (2011) The impacts of international migration on remaining household members: omnibus results from a migration lottery program. Rev Econ Stat 93(4):1297– 1318 Hanson GH, McIntosh C (2010) The great Mexican emigration. Rev Econ Stat 92(4):798–810 Hanson GH, Woodruff C (2003) Emigration and educational attainment in Mexico. Unpublished Manuscript. University of California, San Diego Hildebrandt N, McKenzie D (2005) The effects of migration on child health in Mexico. Economia 6(1):257–89 Lundberg S, Pollak RA (2007) The American family and family economics. J Econ Perspect 21(2):3–26 Lundberg S, Pollak RA (1996) Bargaining and distribution in marriage. J Econ Perspect 10(4):139–158 McKenzie D, Rapoport H (2011) Can migration reduce educational attainment? Evidence from Mexico. J Popul Econ 24(4):1331–58 Mckenzie D, Rapoport H (2007) Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: theory and evidence from Mexico. J Dev Econ 84(1):1–24 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Economic Development (2014) CO3.1: educational attainment by gender and average years spent in formal education. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/CO_3_1_Educational_attainment_by_gender_Sep2014.pdf Rose E (1999) Consumption smoothing and excess female mortality in rural India. Rev Econ Stat 81(1):41–49 Rubalcava L, Teruel G (2006) The Mexican family life survey, first wave. Working paper. http://www.ennvih-mxfls.org Rubalcava L, Teruel G (2008) Mexican family life survey, second wave. Working paper. http://www.ennvih-mxfls.org Thomas D (1990) Intra-household resource allocation: an inferential approach. J Hum Resour 25(4):635–664 Thomas D (1994) Like father, like son; like mother, like daughter: parental resources and child height. J Hum Resour 29(4):950–988 Weiss Y, Willis RJ (1985) Children as collective goods and divorce settlements. J Labor Econ 3(3):268–92 Yang D (2008) International migration, remittances and household investment: evidence from Philippine migrants’ exchange rate shocks. Econ J 118:591–630