Gap between actual and expected time allocation to academic activities and its impact on undergraduate academic performance
Tóm tắt
This study uses survey data and administrative records collected over a three-year period to examine the gap between the amount of time students invested and the amount they were expected to invest in academic activities. The sample includes 2232 first-year and final-year undergraduate students at an elite research university in Kazakhstan. The study measured time allocation gap in terms of the degree to which the total amount of time invested in academic activities fell short of the expected amount (class attendance and out-of-class study time combined), given the student’s credit load. The study found that, on average, undergraduate students (first and fourth year) allocated 35% less time to academic activities than expected under ECTS standards or 28% less time than expected under Carnegie standards. Using a quasi-experimental research design (propensity score matching), the study found that time allocation gap had a negative impact on undergraduate academic performance.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrietti, V., & Velasco, C. (2015). Lecture attendance, study time, and academic performance: A panel data study. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2015.1040182.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2010). Leisure college, USA: The decline in student study time. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.
Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2011). The falling time cost of college: Evidence from half a century of time use data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 468–478.
Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from two decades. Melbourne: Center for the Study of Higher Education.
Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. The Stata Journal, 7(1), 71–83.
Bonsaksen, T., Brown, T., Lim, H. B., & Fong, K. (2017). Approaches to studying predict academic performance in undergraduate occupational therapy students: aAcross-cultural study. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0914-3.
Bratti, M., & Staffolani, S. (2013). Student time allocation and educational production functions. Annals of Economics and Statistics (111/112), 103–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/23646328.
Brint, S., & Cantwell, A. M. (2010). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the University of California Undergraduate experience survey 2006. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2441–2470.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2013). Reconsidering the Carnegie unit: Is it time for a new measure? Washington: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
DiPrete, T. A., & Engelhardt, H. (2000). Estimating causal effects with matching methods in the presence and absence of bias cancellation (report no 2000-013). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck institute for Demographic Research. Retrieved January 29, 2016 from http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/Working/wp-2000-013.pdf
DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociological Methodology, 34, 271–271.
Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D., & Navarro, L. (2003). The effective use of student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study. Economics of Education Review, 22(6), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X.
European Union. (2015). ECTS users' guide 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fernex, A., Lima, L., & de Vries, E. (2015). Exploring time allocation for academic activities by university students in France. Higher Education, 69(3), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9782-5.
Fosnacht, K., McCormick, A. C., & Lerma, R. (2018). First-year students’ time use in college: A latent profile analysis. Research in Higher Education, 59(7), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9497-z.
Grave, B. S. (2010). The effect of student time allocation on academic achievement. Retrieved August 05, 2017 from http://repec.rwi-essen.de/files/REP_10_235.pdf
Grave, B. S. (2011). The effect of student time allocation on academic achievement. Education Economics, 19(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2011.585794.
Gu, X. S., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1993). Comparison of multivariate matching methods: Structures, distances, and algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2(4), 405–420.
Guo, F. (2014). The impact of term-time working on college outcomes in China (Doctoral dissertation), Columbia University. Retrieved from Columbia Academic Commons.
Hansen, B. B. (2004). Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(467), 609–618.
Harris, J. W. (2002). Brief history of American academic credit system: A recipe for incoherence in student learning. Retrieved July 31, 2017 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED470030
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependency in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199–236.
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28.
Imai, K., King, G., & Lau, O. (2007). Zelig: Everyone's statistical software. Retrieved August 31, 2012 from http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig/docs/zelig.pdf
James, R., Krause, K.-L., & Jennings, C. (2010). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from 1994 to 2009. Melbourne: Center for the Study of Higher Education.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Masui, C., Broeckmans, J., Doumen, S., Groenen, A., & Molenberghs, G. (2014). Do diligent students perform better? Complex relations between student and course characteristics, study time, and academic performance in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.721350.
McCormick, A. C. (2011). It's about time: What to make of reported declines in how much college students study. Liberal Education, 97(1), 30–39.
Meng, C., & Heijke, H. (2005). Student time allocation, the learning environment and the acquisition of competencies. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market.
Moreno-Serra, R. (2007). Matching estimator of average treatment effects: A review applied to the evaluation of health care programs. Retrieved September 04, 2012 from http://www.york.ac.uk/res/herc/documents/wp/07_02.pdf
Myers, T. A. (2011). Goodbye, listwise deletion: Presenting hot deck imputation as an easy and effective tool for handling missing data. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.624490.
Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2016). The 2016 Student academic experience survey. York: Higher Education Academy.
Neves, J., & Hillman, N. (2018). The 2018 Student academic experience survey. York: Advance Higher Education & Higher Education Policy Institute.
Porter, S. R. (2011). Do college student surveys have any validity. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0034.
Quadlin, N. Y., & Rudel, D. (2015). Responsibility or liability? Student loan debt and time use in college. Social Forces, 94(2), 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov053.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ribera, A. K., Rocconi, L. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2013). Undergraduates in the professional fields: Exploring the impact of institutional characteristics on time spent preparing for class. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1991). A characterization of optimal designs for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(3), 597–610.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2005). Sensitivity analysis in observational studies. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (Vol. 4, pp. 1809–1814). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2010). Design of observational studies. Philadelphia: Springer.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, R. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516–524.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
Roth, P. (1994). Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychology. Personnel Psychology, 47(3), 537–560.
Rubin, D. B. (2002). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169–188.
Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Seidimbek, A. (2013). Nazarbayev University: Integration of Western and central Asian educational systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.915.
Shedd, J. M. (2003). The history of the student credit hour. New Directions for Higher Education, 2003(122), 5–12.
Silva, E. (2013). The Carnegie unit - Revisited. Retrieved July 31, 2017 from https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/blog/the-carnegie-unit-revisited/
StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP.
Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2008). The causal effect of studying on academic performance. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), 1–55.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.