Gamma Power and Cognition in Patients with Schizophrenia and Their First-Degree Relatives

Neuropsychobiology - Tập 69 Số 2 - Trang 120-128 - 2014
Álvaro Díez1, Vanessa Suazo, Pilar Casado, Manuel Martín‐Loeches, Vicente Molina
1Basic Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology Department, School of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Gamma oscillations are essential for functional neural assembly formation underlying higher cerebral functions. Previous studies concerning gamma band power in schizophrenia have yielded diverse results. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this study, we assessed gamma band power in minimally treated patients with schizophrenia, their first-degree relatives and healthy controls during an oddball paradigm performance, as well as the relation between gamma power and cognitive performance. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We found a higher gamma power in the patient group than in the healthy controls at the P3, P4, Fz, Pz and T5 sites. Compared with their relatives, gamma power in the patients was only marginally higher over P3 and P4. We found a nearly significant inverse association between gamma power at F4 and Tower of London performance in the patients, as well as a significant inverse association between gamma power at T5 and verbal memory and working memory scores in the relatives. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> These results support higher total gamma power in association with schizophrenia and its inverse association with cognitive performance in patients and their first-degree relatives.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.011

10.1093/cercor/bhm073

10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025

10.1038/nature08860

10.3389/neuro.07.017.2009

10.1038/nrn2774

10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.023

10.1007/s10571-006-9062-8

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.09.001

10.1038/npp.2010.150

10.1073/pnas.0406074101

10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.490

10.1007/BF02191956

10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.007

10.1017/S1461145711000848

10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.044

10.1126/science.1110948

10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00294-3

10.1001/archpsyc.56.2.162

10.1093/cercor/bhn107

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5036-11.2012

10.1093/schbul/sbs010

10.1172/JCI37335

10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.04.010

10.1093/schbul/13.2.261

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.11.001

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1897-04.2004

10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.06.006

10.1001/archpsyc.59.4.321

10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.04.008

10.1017/S0033291708003565

10.1073/pnas.0809141106

10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00294-3

10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00227-4

10.1016/j.jphysparis.2007.01.005

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00785.x

10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.025

10.1093/med/9780198526131.003.0004

10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.007

10.1080/713752240

10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.459