Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer—Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

European Urology - Tập 77 Số 4 - Trang 403-417 - 2020
Marlon Perera1,2,3, Nathan Papa1, Matthew J. Roberts2,3, Michael B. Williams2, Cristian Udovicich4, Ian Vela5,2, Daniel Christidis1, Damien Bolton1,6, Michael S. Hofman7, Nathan Lawrentschuk1,8,6,9, Declan G. Murphy8,9
1Department of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
2Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
3Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
4Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
5Australian Prostate Cancer Research Center QLD, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
6Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
7Centre for Molecular Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
8Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
9Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia;

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Siegel, 2018, Cancer statistics, 2018, CA Cancer J Clin, 68, 7, 10.3322/caac.21442

Ost, 2015, Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature, Eur Urol, 67, 852, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.004

Ost, 2018, Surveillance or metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence: a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II trial, J Clin Oncol, 36, 446, 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4853

Siva, 2018, Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic prostate cancer: a prospective clinical trial, Eur Urol, 74, 455, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.004

Ploussard, 2019, Salvage lymph node dissection for nodal recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review, Eur Urol, 76, 493, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.041

Maurer, 2016, Current use of PSMA-PET in prostate cancer management, Nat Rev Urol, 13, 226, 10.1038/nrurol.2016.26

Silver, 1997, Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues, Clin Cancer Res, 3, 81

Bostwick, 1998, Prostate specific membrane antigen expression in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma: a study of 184 cases, Cancer, 82, 2256, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980601)82:11<2256::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-S

Afshar-Oromieh, 2013, PET imaging with a [Ga-68]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 40, 486, 10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2

Han, 2018, Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 74, 179, 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.030

Perera, 2016, Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive Ga-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 70, 926, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021

Papa, 2016, Eur Urol, 70, 926, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021

Liberati, 2009, The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration, BMJ, 339, 2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2700

Higgins, 2008

Whiting, 2011, QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, Ann Intern Med, 155, 529, 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

Nyaga, 2014, a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data, Arch Public Health, 72, 39, 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39

Barendregt, 2013, Meta-analysis of prevalence, J Epidemiol Commun Health, 67, 974, 10.1136/jech-2013-203104

Higgins, 2003, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, BMJ, 327, 557, 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Dwamena, 2007

Hofman, 2018, A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol, BJU Int, 122, 783, 10.1111/bju.14374

Hovels, 2008, The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis, Clin Radiol, 63, 387, 10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022

Evangelista, 2013, Utility of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lymph node involvement identification in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, Eur Urol, 63, 1040, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.039

Pfister, 2016, Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC than with F-18-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 1410, 10.1007/s00259-016-3366-9

Eiber, 2016, Simultaneous Ga-PSMA HBED-CC PET/MRI improves the localization of primary prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 70, 829, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.053

Al-Bayati, 2018, Integrated (68)Gallium labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging enhances discriminatory power of multi-parametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging, Urol Int, 100, 164, 10.1159/000484695

Lopci, 2018, 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with contraindications to or negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging mpMRI: a prospective observational study, J Urol, 200, 95, 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.079

Donato, 2019, Improved specificity with (68)Ga PSMA PET/CT to detect clinically significant lesions “invisible” on multiparametric MRI of the prostate: a single institution comparative analysis with radical prostatectomy histology, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 46, 20, 10.1007/s00259-018-4160-7

Perera, 2016, An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer, Nat Rev Urol, 13, 641, 10.1038/nrurol.2016.177

Murphy, 2017, “Gotta catch ‘em all”, or do we? Pokemet approach to metastatic prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 72, 1, 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.036

Zacho, 2018, 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer: a systematic review of the published literature, Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 38, 911, 10.1111/cpf.12480

Afaq, 2018, Impact of Ga-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT on prostate cancer management, J Nucl Med, 59, 89, 10.2967/jnumed.117.192625

Afshar-Oromieh, 2017, Diagnostic performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 1258, 10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7

Berliner, 2017, Detection rate of PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse of prostate cancer using [Ga-68]PSMA I&T and comparison with published data of [Ga-68]PSMA HBED-CC, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 670, 10.1007/s00259-016-3572-5

Bluemel, 2016, Impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on salvage radiotherapy planning in patients with prostate cancer and persisting PSA values or biochemical relapse after prostatectomy, EJNMMI Res, 6, 78, 10.1186/s13550-016-0233-4

Budaeus, 2016, Initial experience of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT imaging in high-risk prostate cancer patients prior to radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, 69, 393, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010

Byrne, 2018, Delineating sites of failure following post-prostatectomy radiation treatment using Ga-68-PSMA-PET, Radiother Oncol, 126, 244, 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.022

Calais, 2018, Potential impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on prostate cancer definitive radiation therapy planning, J Nucl Med, 59, 1714, 10.2967/jnumed.118.209387

Ceci, 2015, Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 42, 1284, 10.1007/s00259-015-3078-6

Demirkol, 2015, Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging in prostate cancer: impact on clinical decision making process, Prostate, 75, 748, 10.1002/pros.22956

Dewes, 2016, Integration of Ga-68-PSMA-PET imaging in planning of primary definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective study, Radiat Oncol, 11, 73, 10.1186/s13014-016-0646-2

Dietlein, 2015, Comparison of [F-18]DCFPyL and [Ga-68]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC for PSMA-PET imaging in patients with relapsed prostate cancer, Mol Imaging Biol, 17, 575, 10.1007/s11307-015-0866-0

Eiber, 2015, Evaluation of hybrid Ga-68-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, J Nucl Med, 56, 668, 10.2967/jnumed.115.154153

Einspieler, 2017, Detection efficacy of hybrid Ga-68-PSMA ligand PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after primary radiation therapy defined by Phoenix criteria, J Nucl Med, 58, 1081, 10.2967/jnumed.116.184457

Grubmuller, 2018, Staging performance and clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA 11 ligand PET/MRI for primary diagnosed prostate cancer. Presented at: 33rd Annual European Association of Urology Congress, EAU, Denmark, Eur Urol Suppl, 17, e1313, 10.1016/S1569-9056(18)31753-6

Gupta, 2017, A comparative study of 68Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for lymph node staging in high risk prostate cancer patients: an initial experience, World J Nucl Med, 16, 186, 10.4103/1450-1147.207272

Gupta, 2017, Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography for prostate cancer: distribution of disease and implications for radiation therapy planning, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 99, 701, 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2448

Habl, 2017, Ga-68-PSMA-PET for radiation treatment planning in prostate cancer recurrences after surgery: individualized medicine or new standard in salvage treatment, Prostate, 77, 920, 10.1002/pros.23347

Henkenberens, 2018, Patterns of relapse as determined by Ga-68-PSMA ligand PET/CT after radical prostatectomy: importance for tailoring and individualizing treatment, Strahlenther Onkol, 194, 303, 10.1007/s00066-017-1231-9

Hruby, 2017, Delineating biochemical failure with Ga-68-PSMA-PET following definitive external beam radiation treatment for prostate cancer, Radiother Oncol, 122, 99, 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.11.023

Kabasakal, 2017, The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels, Nucl Med Commun, 38, 149, 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000617

Kranzbuhler, 2018, Clinical performance of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 45, 20, 10.1007/s00259-017-3850-x

Lake, 2017, Optimal MRI sequences for Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in evaluation of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer, EJNMMI Res, 7, 77, 10.1186/s13550-017-0327-7

Lengana, 2018, Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT imaging in black versus white South African patients with prostate carcinoma presenting with a low volume, androgen-dependent biochemical recurrence: a prospective study, Nucl Med Commun, 39, 179, 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000791

Maurer, 2015, Preoperative lymph node staging in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer patients using 68Ga-HBED-PSMA PET hybrid imaging—a patient- and field-based analysis, J Urol, 193, 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2118

Meredith, 2016, The use of (68) Ga-PSMA PET CT in men with biochemical recurrence after definitive treatment of acinar prostate cancer, BJU Int, 118, 49, 10.1111/bju.13616

Obek, 2017, The accuracy of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 1806, 10.1007/s00259-017-3752-y

Roach, 2018, The impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter study, J Nucl Med, 59, 82, 10.2967/jnumed.117.197160

Sanli, 2017, Relationships between serum PSA levels. Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer, Ann Nucl Med, 31, 709, 10.1007/s12149-017-1207-y

Sachpekidis, 2016, Ga-68-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 1288, 10.1007/s00259-015-3302-4

Sahlmann, 2016, Biphasic Ga-68-PSMA-HBED-CC-PET/CT in patients with recurrent and high-risk prostate carcinoma, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 898, 10.1007/s00259-015-3251-y

Schmuck, 2017, Comparison of standard and delayed imaging to improve the detection rate of [Ga-68]PSMA I&T PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence or prostate-specific antigen persistence after primary therapy for prostate cancer, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 960, 10.1007/s00259-017-3669-5

Schwenck, 2017, Comparison of Ga-68-labelled PSMA-11 and C-11-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 44, 92, 10.1007/s00259-016-3490-6

Sterzing, 2016, Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a new technique with high potential for the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer patients, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 34, 10.1007/s00259-015-3188-1

van Leeuwen, 2016, Ga-68-PSMA has a high detection rate of prostate cancer recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in patients being considered for salvage radiation treatment, BJU Int, 117, 732, 10.1111/bju.13397

Van Leeuwen, 2016, Prospective evaluation of 68GA-PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer, Presented at: 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, AUA, San Diego, CA, USA, J Urol, 195, e1038

Verburg, 2016, Extent of disease in recurrent prostate cancer determined by [Ga-68]PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT in relation to PSA levels. PSA doubling time and Gleason score, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 397, 10.1007/s00259-015-3240-1

Zhang, 2017, Comparison of Ga-68-PSMA-11 PET-CT with mpMRI for preoperative lymph node staging in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer, J Transl Med, 15, 230, 10.1186/s12967-017-1333-2