Fuzzy risk analysis using a new technique of ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers

Granular Computing - Tập 7 - Trang 127-140 - 2021
Kartik Patra1
1Department of Mathematics, Vivekananda Satavarshiki Mahavidyalaya, Manikpara, India

Tóm tắt

Ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy number is very important to order the fuzzy numbers. In this propose paper a new approach has been introduced for ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. In this new technique the mean position, area and perimeter of the fuzzy numbers has been considered as major factors. Some properties corresponding to the new proposed method have been discussed. There are some existing techniques of ranking generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. But some lacunas exist in their proposed methods. It has been compared with existing different techniques of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and has been overcome the drawbacks of those existing methods by our new method. Finally, a risk analysis of a selection of production house has been shown to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbasbandy S, Hajjari T (2009) A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Comput Math Appl 57(3):413–419 Asady B (2010) The revised method of ranking L-R fuzzy number based on deviation degree. Expert Syst Appl 37(7):5056–5060 Chen SM, Chang CH (2016) Fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on transformation techniques of intuitionistic fuzzy values and intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators. Inform Sci 352:133–149 Chen SH, Chen SM (2006) A new method for ranking generalized fuzzy numbers handling fuzzy risk analysis problems. In Proceedings of the 9-th joint conferece on Information Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.(pp 1196–1199) Chen SJ, Chen SM (2003) Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(1):45–56 Chen SJ, Chen SM (2007) Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Intell 26(1):1–11 Chen SM, Chen JH (2009) Fuzzy risk analysis based on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers with different heights and different spreads. Expert Syst Appl 36(3, Part 2) (2009) 6833–6842 Chen SM, Chiou CH (2014) Multiattribute Decision Making Based on Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. PSO Techn Evident Reason Methodol IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):1905–1916 Chen SM, Hsiao WH, Jong WT (1997) Bidirectional approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 91(3):339–353 Chen SM, Hsiao WH (2000) Bidirectional approximate reasoning for rule-based systems using interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 113(2):185–203 Chen SM, Sanguansat K (2011) Analyzing fuzzy risk based on similarity measures between interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 38(2011):8612–8621 Chen SM (2011) Sanguansat K (2011) Analyzing fuzzy risk based on a new fuzzy ranking method between generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):2163–2171 Cheng CH (1998) A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 95(3):307–317 Chutia R, Chutia B (2017) A new method of ranking parametric form of fuzzy numbers using value and ambiguity. Appl Soft Comput 52(2017):1154–1168 Chutia R (2017) Ranking of fuzzy numbers by using value and angle in the epsilon-deviation degree method. Appl Soft Comput 60(2017):706–721 Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy Sets Syst. Theory and Applications. Academic Press. Inc., New York Hejazi SR, Doostparast A, Hosseini SM (2011) An improved fuzzy risk analysis based on new similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Applic 38:9179–9185 Nasseri SH, Zadeh MM, Kardoost M, Behmanesh E (2013) Ranking fuzzy quantities based on the angle of the reference functions. Appl Math Modell 37(22):9230–9241 Patra K, Mondal SK (2012) Risk analysis in diabetes prediction based on a new approach of ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Cybernetics Syst Int J 43(8):623–650 Patra K, Mondal SK (2014) Fuzzy Risk Analysis of any disaster level using trapezoidal fuzzy number. South Asian J Math 4(1):2014 Patra K, Mondal SK (2015) Multi-Item Supplier Selection Model with Fuzzy Risk Analysis Studied by Possibility and Necessity Constraints. Fuzzy Inform Eng 7(2015):451–474 Patra K, Mondal SK (2015) Fuzzy risk analysis using area and height based similarity measure on generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and its application. Appl Soft Comput 28(2015):276–284 Patra K (2017) Mondal SK (2017) Risk analysis in a production system using fuzzy cognitive map. Int J Math Oper Res 11(1):29–44 Rezvani S (2015) Ranking generalized exponential trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on variance. Appl Math Computat 262(2015):191–198 Schmucker KJ (1984) Fuzzy Sets, natural language computations, and risk analysis. Computer Science Press, Rockville Wang CY, Chen SM (2017) Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inform Sci 397(2017):155–167 Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL, Chin KS (2006) On the centroids of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(7):919–926 Wei SH, Chen SM (2009) A new approch for fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 36(1):589–598 Xu Z, Shang S, Quin W, Shu W (2010) A method for fuzzy risk analysis based on the new similarity of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl 37:1920–1927 Yager RR, (1978) Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval, In 1978 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, pp. 1435-1437 Yu VF, Chi HTX, Shen CW (2013) Ranking fuzzy numbers based on epsilon-deviation degree. Appl Soft Comput 13(8):3621–3627 Yu VF, Dat LQ (2014) An improved ranking method for fuzzy numbers with integral values, Appl Soft Comput 14(Part C) (2014) 603–608 Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Inform Control 8:338–356 Zeng S, Chen SM, Kuo LW (2019) Multiattribute decision making based on novel score function of intuitionistic fuzzy values and modified VIKOR method. Inform Sci 488:76–92