Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods in changing the damming level of a small hydropower plant: Case study of Rosko SHP in Poland

Water Resources and Industry - Tập 29 - Trang 100204 - 2023
Ireneusz Laks1, Zbigniew Walczak1, Natalia Walczak2
1Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637, Poznan, Poland
2Department of Hydraulic and Sanitary Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, 60-637, Poznan, Poland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hatata, 2019, A feasibility study of small hydro power for selected locations in Egypt,, Energy Strategy Rev., 24, 300, 10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.013 Zimny, 2010, Renewable energy sources in low-energy construction, Polish, Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne, Warszawa Kishore, 2021, A comprehensive study on the recent progress and trends in development of small hydropower projects,, Energies, 14, 2882, 10.3390/en14102882 Lange, 2018, Basin-scale effects of small hydropower on biodiversity dynamics, Front. Ecol. Environ., 16, 397, 10.1002/fee.1823 Kibler, 2013, Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3104, 10.1002/wrcr.20243 Abazaj, 2016, Ø. Moen, A. Ruud, striking the balance between renewable energy generation and water status protection: hydropower in the context of the European renewable energy directive and water framework directive, environ, Policy Gov., 26, 409, 10.1002/eet.1710 Couto, 2018, Global proliferation of small hydropower plants - science and policy, Front. Ecol. Environ., 16, 91, 10.1002/fee.1746 Gaudard, 2014, Reprint of “The future of hydropower in Europe: Interconnecting climate, markets and policies,”, Environ. Sci. Pol., 43, 5, 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.005 Hamududu, 2012, Assessing climate change impacts on global hydropower, Energies, 5, 305, 10.3390/en5020305 Nicolini, 2017, Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 74, 412, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.032 Ajanovic, 2019, On the long-term prospects of power-to-gas technologies, WIREs Energy Environ., 8, 10.1002/wene.318 Cao, 2019, Experimental modeling of PEM fuel cells using a new improved seagull optimization algorithm, Energy Rep., 5, 1616, 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.013 Cao, 2019, Multi-objective optimization of a PEMFC based CCHP system by meta-heuristics, Energy Rep., 5, 1551, 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.029 Fei, 2019, Optimal configuration and energy management for combined solar chimney, solid oxide electrolysis, and fuel cell: a case study in Iran, Energy Sources Part Recovery Util. Environ, EFFLATOUNIA, 1 Poff, 2018, Beyond the natural flow regime? Broadening the hydro-ecological foundation to meet environmental flows challenges in a non-stationary world, Freshw. Biol., 63, 1011, 10.1111/fwb.13038 Bunn, 2002, Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity, Environ. Manag., 30, 492, 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 Njiru, 2017 Anaza, 2017, Micro hydro-electric energy generation-An overview, Am. J. Eng. Res, 5 Nautiyal, 2011, Varun, A. Sharma, Small hydropower for sustainable energy development in India, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 2021, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.006 Craig, 2019, Net revenue and downstream flow impact trade-offs for a network of small-scale hydropower facilities in California, Environ. Res. Commun, 1, 10.1088/2515-7620/aafd62 Kuriqi, 2021, Ecological impacts of run-of-river hydropower plants—current status and future prospects on the brink of energy transition, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 142, 110833, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110833 Kumar, 2017, A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development, Renew. Sustain, Energy Rev., 69, 596 Mulliner, 2016, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability, Omega, 59, 146, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013 Saaty, 2008, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1, 83 Siddayao, 2014, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in spatial modeling for floodplain risk assessment, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput., 4, 450, 10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V4.453 Komi, 2016, Integrated flood risk assessment of rural communities in the oti river basin, west africa, Hydrology, 3, 42, 10.3390/hydrology3040042 Laks, 2020, Efficiency of polder modernization for flood protection, Case Stud. Golina Polder., 12 Lyu, 2019, Data in flood risk assessment of metro systems in a subsiding environment using the interval FAHP-FCA approach, Data Brief, 104468 Schumann, 2011, Application of scenarios and multi-criteria decision making tools in flood polder planning, 249 Sinha, 2008, Flood risk analysis in the Kosi river basin, north Bihar using multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process (AHP), J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens, 36, 335, 10.1007/s12524-008-0034-y Stefanidis, 2013, Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Nat. Hazards, 68, 569, 10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5 Suseno, 2012, Strategi kebijakan pengelolaan polder tawang sebagai pengendali banjir dengan pendekatan analysis hierarchy process (AHP), JEJAK J, Ekon. Dan Kebijak, 5 Wang, 2021, Flood risk assessment of metro system using improved trapezoidal fuzzy AHP: a case study of guangzhou, emote Sens., 5154 Dorji, 2021, Selection of best location for small hydropower plant (SHP) along Chamkhar River, bhutanusing analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Acad. An Int. Multidiscip. Res. J., 11, 293 Rana, 2020, Selection of best location for small hydro power project using AHP, WPM and TOPSIS methods, ISH, J. Hydraul. Eng., 26, 173 Saracoglu, 2015, An AHP application in the investment selection problem of small hydropower plants in Turkey, Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, 7 Singh, 2016, Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 55, 43, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.138 Vassoney, 2017, Use of multicriteria analysis (MCA) for sustainable hydropower planning and management, J. Environ. Manag., 196, 48, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.067 Cabrera, 2019, Flood-prone area assessment using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: a case study in davao oriental, Philippines,, Water, 11, 2203, 10.3390/w11112203 Abdelkarim, 2020, Integration of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis and analytic hierarchy process to assess flood hazard on the Al-shamal train pathway in Al-qurayyat region, kingdom of Saudi arabia, Water, 1702 Ajjur, 2020, Flood hazard mapping using a multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS (case study Gaza Governorate, Palestine), Arabian J. Geosci., 13, 1, 10.1007/s12517-019-5024-6 Cai, 2021, Flooding risk assessment and analysis based on GIS and the TFN-AHP method: a case study of chongqing, China,, Atmosphere, 12, 623, 10.3390/atmos12050623 Parsian, 2021, Remote sens., 4761 Vogel, 2016, Methodology and software solutions for multicriteria evaluation of floodplain retention suitability, Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 43, 301, 10.1080/15230406.2015.1039587 Demirel, 2008, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Application, 53 Liu, 2020, A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements, Expert Syst. Appl., 113738 Lyu, 2020, Risk assessment using a new consulting process in fuzzy AHP, J. Construct. Eng. Manag., 146, 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757 Patil, 2018, Fuzzy ahp methodology and its sole applications, Int. J. Manag. Res. Rev., 8, 24 Ahmed, 2019, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: a performance analysis of various algorithms,, Fuzzy Set Syst., 362, 110, 10.1016/j.fss.2018.08.009 Kahraman, 2003, Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, Logist. Inf. Manag., 10.1108/09576050310503367 van Laarhoven, 1983, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory,, Fuzzy Set Syst., 11, 229, 10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7 Buckley, 1987, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis, 389 Gündoğdu, 2020, A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application,, Soft Comput., 24, 4607, 10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w Karakaş, 2019, Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for Turkey via modified fuzzy AHP, Int. J. Energy Econ. Pol. Ertay, 2013, Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey, Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, 38, 10.3846/20294913.2012.762950 Karatop, 2021, Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a Fuzzy AHP-EDAS-Fuzzy FMEA approach, Comput. Ind. Eng, 106958 Yucesan, 2019, Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: a model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP,, Energy Pol., 126, 343, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.039 Ram, 2018, Sensitivity analysis of a hydroelectric production power plant under reworking scheme using fuzzy AHP approach, J. Ind. Prod. Eng, 35, 481 Pavlović, 2021, A multi-criteria approach for assessing the potential of renewable energy sources for electricity generation: case Serbia,, Energy Rep., 7, 8624, 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.02.072 Seddiki, 2019, Multi-criteria evaluation of renewable energy alternatives for electricity generation in a residential building, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 110, 101, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.046 Wang, 2018, A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for renewable energy plants location selection in Vietnam under a fuzzy environment, Appl. Sci., 2069 Balusa, 2019, Sensitivity analysis of fuzzy-analytic hierarchical process (FAHP) decision-making model in selection of underground metal mining method, J. Sustain. Min, 18, 8, 10.1016/j.jsm.2018.10.003 Król-Badziak, 2021, Environmental and socio-economic performance of different tillage systems in maize grain production: application of Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria Decision Making, J. Clean. Prod., 278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123792 Sitorus, 2020, Equipment selection in mineral processing - a sensitivity analysis approach for a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model, Miner. Eng., 150, 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106261 Kim, 2020, Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based mobile robot path planning, Electronics, 9, 290, 10.3390/electronics9020290 Srdjevic, 2012, Robustness of AHP in selecting wastewater treatment method for the coloured metal industry: Serbian case study, Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 29, 147, 10.1080/10286608.2012.672412 Kutlu, 2012, Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP, Expert Syst. Appl., 39, 61, 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044 Ren, 2015, Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20, 842, 10.1007/s11367-015-0877-8 Wu, 2008, FAHP sensitivity analysis for measurement nonprofit organizational performance, qual, Quantum, 42, 283 Díaz, 2022, Application of Monte Carlo and fuzzy analytic hierarchy processes for ranking floating wind farm locations, Ocean eng., 110453 Serrano-Gomez, 2019, Monte Carlo approach to fuzzy AHP risk analysis in renewable energy construction projects, PLoS One, 14, 10.1371/journal.pone.0215943 Shi, 2017, A risk assessment method to quantitatively investigate the methane explosion in underground coal mine, Process Saf. Environ, Prot. Met., 107, 317 Leonelli, 2012, Enhancing a decision support tool with sensitivity analysis Bhatt, 2021, Analysing the factors affecting the selection of ERP package: a fuzzy AHP approach, Inf. Syst. E-Bus, OR Manag., 19, 641 Tsai, 2010, Fuzzy hierarchy sensitive with Delphi method to evaluate hospital organization performance, Expert Syst. Appl., 37, 5533, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.099 Zou, 2013, Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 27, 525, 10.1007/s00477-012-0598-5 Yang, 2013, Application of a triangular fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measures analysis, Nat. Hazards, 68, 657, 10.1007/s11069-013-0642-x Malcolm, 2008, The potential use of acoustic Doppler current profilers in hydraulic habitat studies: feasibility and limitations report, Fish. Res. Serv. Collab. Rep Laks, 2019, Mapping of floodplain retention and active flow area in 1D models for large and regional-scale hydrodynamic modeling, J. Hydrol. Eng., 24, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001754 Preissman, 1961, 433 Saaty, 1990, How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48, 9, 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Krejčí, 2017, A fuzzy extension of Analytic Hierarchy Process based on the constrained fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Optim. Decis, Mak, 16, 89 Tesfamariam, 2006, Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP), Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 21, 35, 10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9 Saaty, 1987, The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used,, Math. Model., 9, 161, 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8 Chou, 2019, Assessing the human resource in science and technology for Asian countries: application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, Symmetry, 11, 251, 10.3390/sym11020251 Güngör, 2009, A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem,, Appl. Soft Comput., 9, 641, 10.1016/j.asoc.2008.09.003 Tiryaki, 2009, Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Inf. Sci., 179, 53, 10.1016/j.ins.2008.07.023 2019, Prioritising critical success factors of TQM in Malaysia aerospace industry using fuzzy AHP Chen, 1996, Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations, Fuzzy Set Syst., 77, 265, 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00096-8 Chen, 1985, Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set, Fuzzy Set Syst., 17, 113, 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8 Hamidi, 2010, Risk assessment based selection of rock TBM for adverse geological conditions using Fuzzy-AHP, Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 69, 523, 10.1007/s10064-009-0260-8 Yager, 1980, On a general class of fuzzy connectives, Fuzzy Set Syst., 90013 Enea, 2004, Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making, 3, 39, 10.1023/B:FODM.0000013071.63614.3d Caha Wang, 2008, On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 186, 735, 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050 McGill, 1978, Variations of box plots, Am, Stat, 32, 12 Vassoney, 2021, Comparing multi-criteria decision-making methods for the assessment of flow release scenarios from small hydropower plants in the alpine area, Front. Environ. Sci., 9, 10.3389/fenvs.2021.635100 Chien, 2020, An evaluation model of quantitative and qualitative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for hydroelectric plant location selection, Energies, 2783 Zhang, 2020, Small hydropower sustainability evaluation for the countries along the Belt and Road, Environ. Dev., 100528 Liziński, 2015, Application of CVM method in the evaluation of flood control and water and sewage management projects, J. Water Land Dev., 24, 41, 10.1515/jwld-2015-0006 Srdjevic, 2008, Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans, Water Resour, OR Manag., 22, 877 Bender, 2000, A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty,, Fuzzy Set Syst., 115, 35, 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00025-1