Funding illness prevention and health promotion in Australia: a way forward

Australia and New Zealand Health Policy - Tập 6 - Trang 1-4 - 2009
Anthony Harris1, Duncan Mortimer1
1Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

Tóm tắt

Unlike pharmaceuticals and private medical services there is no single source of funding for illness prevention and health promotion and no systematic process for setting priorities in public health. There is a need to improve the efficiency of access to health funding across prevention and treatment. We discuss a number of reforms to existing funding arrangements including the creation of a national Preventative Priorities Advisory Committee (PrePAC) to set priorities. We propose the establishment of a PrePAC to provide evidence and set priorities across health promotion and illness prevention, with a national dedicated fund for health promotion. A national evidence-based funding system for illness prevention and health promotion would legitimise a substantial and sustained budget for health promotion, breaking down some of the barriers in a fragmented federal health care system.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Segal L, Dalziel K, Mortimer D: Fixing the game: Are between-silo differences in funding arrangements handicapping some interventions and giving others a head-start?. Health Econ. 2009. National Institute of Clinical Excellence: NICE implementation programme: putting NICE guidance into practice. [http://www.nice.org.uk/media/E7B/C4/PuttingNICEGuidanceIntoPractice2009.pdf] National Institute of Clinical Excellence: The public health guidance development process: an overview for stakeholders including public health practitioners, policy makers and the public. [http://www.nice.org.uk/media/69E/F9/CPHE_Process_manual.pdf] National Institute of Clinical Excellence: Methods for development of NICE public health guidance. [http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CPHEMethodsManual.pdf] Harris A, Mortimer D: A Preventative Priorities Advisory Committee and Prevention Benefits Schedule for Australia. 2008, Options Paper: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra Council of Australian Governments: National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health. 2008, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission: A healthier future for all Australians - final report. 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra Preventative Health Taskforce: Australia: the healthiest country by 2020 - National Preventative Health Strategy. 2009, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra O'Malley S: The Australian experiment: The use of evidence based medicine for the reimbursement of surgical and diagnostic procedures (1998-2004). Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 3: 3-10.1186/1743-8462-3-3. Henry DA, Hill SR, Harris A: Drug prices and value for money: the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. JAMA. 2005, 294: 2630-2632. 10.1001/jama.294.20.2630. Goldsmith L, Hutchinson B, Hurley J: Economic evaluation across the four faces of prevention: a Canadian perspective. 2006, CHEPA Working Paper Series Paper 06-01; Hamilton, Canada Wanless D: Securing good health for the whole population. Securing good health for the whole population. 2004, HM Treasury: London Oldenburg BF, Harper TA: Investing in the future: prevention a priority at last. Med J Aust. 2008, 189: 267-268. Lin V, Fawkes S, Hughes A: A Vision for Prevention in Australia. 2008, Discussion Paper, Australian Institute of Health Policy Studies