From the “right to know” to the “right to object” and “decide”. A comparative perspective on participation in siting procedures for high level radioactive waste repositories

Arbeitskreis Auswahlverfahren Endlagerstandorte (AkEnd), 2002 Åhagen, 2006, Approaching a decision on final disposal – the view of the municipality of Oskarshamn Arnstein, 1969, A ladder of citizen participation, JAIP, 35, 216 Assemblée antinucléaire de Bure, 2013 Assemblée antinucléaire de Bure, 2013 Auffermann, 2015, A final solution for a big challenge. The governance of nuclear waste disposal in Finland, 227 Blowers, 1999, Nuclear waste and landscapes of risk, Landsc. Res., 24, 241, 10.1080/01426399908706562 Blowers, 2016 Bergmans, 2015, The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social-technical divide, J. Risk Res., 18, 347, 10.1080/13669877.2014.971335 Bergmans, 2010 2015 Di Nucci, 2015, Same, same, but different. Nuclear Waste Governance in France, Finland and Sweden, 42 Di Nucci, 2016, NIMBY oder IMBY:Akzeptanz, Freiwilligkeit und Kompensationen in der Standortsuche für die Endlagerung radioaktiver Abfälle Demos, 2015 Endlager-Kommission (EK), 2016 Frey, 1996, The old lady visits your backyard: a tale of morals and markets, J. Polit. Econ., 104, 1297, 10.1086/262060 Hocke, 2015, Always the same old Story? Nuclear waste governance in Germany, 177 Holmstrand, 2006, NGO participation in the Swedish EIA process to establish a nuclear waste disposal Jenkins-Smith, 2001, Mitigation and benefits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facilities: determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness, Risk Anal., 21, 371, 10.1111/0272-4332.212118 Kåberger, 2015, Model or Muddle? Governance and management of radioactive waste in Sweden, 203 Kojo, 2012, Nuclear community considering threats and benefits of final disposal. Local opinions regarding the spent nuclear fuel repository in Finland, IJETM, 15, 124, 10.1504/IJETM.2012.047231 Kunreuther, 1996, The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities, J. Policy Anal. Manag., 15, 601, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199623)15:4<601::AID-PAM6>3.0.CO;2-L Le Hir, 2013 Lehtonen, 2017, The Finnish success story in the governance of a megaproject: the (minimal) role of socioeconomic evaluation in the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel Lehtonen, 2015, Megaproject underway. Governance of nuclear waste management in France, 117 Lehtonen, 2010, Deliberative decision-making on radioactive waste management in Finland, France and the UK: influence of mixed forms of deliberation in the macro discursive context, J. Integr. Environ. Sci., 7, 175, 10.1080/1943815X.2010.506487 Litmanen, 2009, The temporary nature of societal risk evaluation: Understanding the Finnish nuclear decisions, 192 Litmanen, 2010, The rationality of acceptance in a nuclear community, Int. J. Nucl. Gov. Econ. Ecol., 3, 42 NEA, 2015 NEA, 2010 NEA, 2009 NEA, 2007 NEA, 2004 Shrader-Frechette, 2000, Duties to future generations, proxy consent, intra- and intergenerational equity: the case of nuclear waste, Risk Anal., 20, 771, 10.1111/0272-4332.206071 Shrader-Frechette, 1993 Solomon, 2010, Three decades of social science research on high-level nuclear waste, RHCPP, 1, 13 Streffer, 2011 STUK Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, 2015 Sundqvist, 2006, Stakeholder involvement in Swedish nuclear waste management Thegerström, 2013, Deep geological disposal of nuclear waste in the Swedish crystalline bedrock, Atw, 359 Thegerström, 2010 Ueberhorst, 2015 Wiedemann, 1993, Public participation in waste management decision making: analysis and management of conflicts, J. Hazard. Mater., 33, 355, 10.1016/0304-3894(93)85085-S World Nuclear Association (WNA), 2016 World Nuclear News (WNN), 2015