From the environmental debt to the environmental loan: trends and future challenges for intergenerational discounting
Tóm tắt
It is well known that the incorporation of the intergenerational equity objective has turned the traditional Cost–Benefit Analysis (CBA) approach into an obsolete tool for the evaluation of certain types of projects, particularly those exhibiting many environmental externalities and those whose effects extend throughout a long period of time. Two main changes are taking place in CBA in order to adapt this methodology to the sustainable development paradigm: (a) the development of new tools for the economic valuation of environmental externalities that were traditionally left out of the analysis; and (b) an in-depth revision of the theoretical foundations underlying the traditional approaches to discounting, since the repercussions of decisions that are presently being debated will extend to a distant future (in some cases for centuries), whereas in the classical CBA, we deal with few decades at best. This paper aims at investigating the discounting operation in CBA, trying to summarize the main approaches available in the literature, with specific reference to the tools which allow future generations to be included in the analysis. In order to support the theoretical explanation, a real case study is analysed concerning the evaluation of a waste incinerator that has been constructed in the Province of Turin (Italy).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ackerman, F. (2004). Priceless benefits, costly mistakes: What’s wrong with cost–benefit analysis? Post-autistic economics review, 25, 2–7.
Almansa Sáez, C., & Calatrava Requena, J. (2007). Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A methodological proposal. Ecological Economics, 60, 712–725.
Almansa Sáez, C., & Martinez Paz, J. M. (2011). What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of the Total Environment, 409(7), 1305–1314.
Almansa Sáez, C., & Martinez Paz, J. M. (2012). Intergenerational equity and dual discounting. Environment and Development Economics, 16(6), 685–707.
Arrow, K. J., Cline, W. R., Maeler, K. G., Munasinghe, M., Squitieri, R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1996). Intertemporal equity, discounting and economic efficiency. In J. P. Bruce, L. Hoesung, & E. F. Haites (Eds.), Second assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: University Press.
Azar, C., & Holmberg, J. (1995). Defining the generational environmental debt. Ecological Economics, 14, 7–19.
Benzion, U., Rapoport, A., & Yagil, J. (1989). Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Science, 35, 270–284.
Bottero, M. (2010). Le Analisi Costi Benefici. In G. Mondini (Ed.), Metodologie di valutazione per la sostenibilità. Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2010). Integrating the analytic network process (ANP) and the driving force-pressure-state-impact- responses (DPSIR) model for the sustainability assessment of territorial transformations. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(5), 618–644.
Bottero, M., Ferretti, V., & Mondini, G. (2012). Valori ambientali, equità intergenerazionale e sostenibilità: una riflessione a partire dall’Analisi Costi Benefici. Valori e Valutazioni, 9, 91–106.
Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2008). An appraisal of analytic network process and its role in sustainability assessment in Northern Italy. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 19(6), 642–660.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1942). Private enterprise and conservation. Journal of Farm Economy, 24(1), 75–96.
Cropper, M. L., Aydade, S. K., & Portner, P. R. (1994). Preferences for live saving programs: How the public discount time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8(3), 243–246.
Davila Alotto, F. (2005). La valutazione dell’impianto di termovalorizzazione di Gerbido: un’applicazione dell’Analisi Costi Benefici. First level degree Thesis in Environmental Engineering, Politecnico of Torino, supervisors: prof. Giulio Mondini, Ing. Marta Bottero.
ExternE, Externalities of Energy (2005). Methodology update, European Commission DG XII, Bruxelles, 2005.
Ferretti, V., & Pomarico, S. (2012). Integrated sustainability assessments: A spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 843–867.
Harrod, R. (1948). Towards a dynamic economy. London: St. Martin ‘s Press.
Hasselmann, K. (1999). Intertemporal accounting of climate change: Harmonizing economic efficiency and climate stewardship. Climate Change, 41, 333–350.
Henderson, N., & Bateman, I. (1995). Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting. Environmental & Resource Economics, 5, 413–423.
Johanneson, M., & Johanneson, P. O. (1997). Quality of life and the WTP for an increased life expectancy at an advanced age. Journal of Public Economic, 65, 219–228.
Keller, D. R. (Ed.). (2010). Environmental ethics, the big questions. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Krutilla, J. V., & Fisher, A. C. (1975). The economics of natural environments. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kula, E. (1988). Future generations: The modified discounting method. Project Appraisal, 3(2), 85–88.
Kula, E. (1992). Economics of natural resources and the environment. London: Chapman & Hall.
Lesser, J. A., Dodds, D. E., & Zerbe, R. O. (1997). Environmental economics and policy. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Lind, R. C. (1982). Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Luckert, M. K., & Admowicz, W. L. (1993). Empirical measures of factors affecting social rates of discount. Environmental & Resource Economics, 3, 1–21.
Malcevschi, S. (2010). Valutazione ambientale, Lecture notes of the course.
Martin-Ortega, J., Brouwer, R., & Aiking, H. (2011). Application of a value-based equivalency method to assess environmental damage compensation under the European Environmental Liability Directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1461–1470.
MEA, Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Current state and trends. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Mishan, E. J. (1994). Cost benefit analysis: An informal introduction. New York: Routledge.
Mondini G. (2009). Per una valutazione integrata. In: Bottero, M., Mondini, G. (Eds.), Valutazione e sostenibilità. Piani programmi progetti. Celid: Torino.
Nardini, A. (2005). Decidere l’ambiente con l’approccio partecipato. Mazzanti Editori: Venezia.
Pearce, D., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Harvester Weats Leaf: Hertfordshire.
Perrow, M. R., & Davy, A. J. (2002). Handbook of ecological restoration (volume 2) restoration in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pietrapertosa, F., Cosmi, C., Macchiato, M., Salvia, M., & Cuomo, V. (2009). Life Cycle Assessment, ExternE and Comprehensive analysis for an integrated evaluation of the environmental impact of anthropogenic activities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1039–1048.
Politecnico di Torino. (2003). Analisi delle caratteristiche tecniche ambientali di tre siti di possibile localizzazione dell’impianto di termovalorizzazione, Internal report.
Poulos, C., & Whittington, D. (2000). Time preferences for life-saving programs: Evidence from six less developed countries. Environmental Science and Technology, 34, 1445–1455.
Ramsey, F. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.
Rebitzer, G., Loerincik, Y., & Jolliet, O. (2002). Input–Output Life Cycle Assessment: From theory to applications. 16th Discussion forum on Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Analysis, 7, 74–76.
Saerbeck, R. (1990). Economic Appraisal of Projects. Guidelines for a Simplified Cost Benefit Analysis, EIB paper no. 15. European Investment Bank: Luxembourg.
Senthil Kumaran, D., Ong, S. K., Nee, A. Y. C., & Tan Reginald, B. H. (2003). A proposed tool to integrate environmental and economical assessments of products. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 51–72.
Solow, R. (1991). Sustainability: An economists perspective. In R. Dorfman & N. S. Dorfman (Eds.), Economics of the environment. New York: W.W Norton and Co.
Stellin, G., & Rosato, P. (1998). La valutazione economica dei beni ambientali. Metodologia e casi di studio,. Città Studi Edizioni: Torino.
Stern, N. (2006/2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., et al. (2004). System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 657–664.
Sumaila, U. R., & Walters, C. J. (2005). Intergenerational discounting: A new intuitive approach. Ecological Economics, 52, 135–142.
TRM S.p.A. (2005). Relazione di sintesi sullo studio preliminare per la realizzazione del 1° termovalorizzatore della Provincia di Torino. Working paper.
Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 201–208.