Từ Khu Vực Thứ Ba đến Xã Hội Lớn: Cách Mà Chính Sách Chính Phủ Vương Quốc Anh Thay Đổi Đã Gặm Nhấm Niềm Tin Ở Khu Vực Thứ Ba

Linda Milbourne1, Mike Cushman2
1School of Social Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
2Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

Tóm tắt

Bài báo này dựa trên các khái niệm về niềm tin để phân tích các chính sách gần đây ảnh hưởng đến mối quan hệ giữa khu vực công và khu vực thứ ba, xem xét cạnh tranh, các cơ chế ‘lệnh và kiểm soát’ cũng như bước chuyển sang cộng đồng trong việc hình thành các văn hóa mối quan hệ. Dựa trên các ví dụ từ các nghiên cứu thực nghiệm ở hai khu vực nội thành của Anh, chúng tôi khám phá những cách mà quyền lực và kiểm soát được thực thi qua các văn hóa và tổ chức chủ đạo làm suy yếu các cách tiếp cận độc lập, đổi mới và học hỏi tổ chức giữa các khu vực. Các cơ quan nhà nước đã coi niềm tin vào các hành động của họ là điều hiển nhiên trong khi chuyển giao trách nhiệm cho việc cung cấp dịch vụ và rủi ro trong trường hợp thất bại cho người khác. Chúng tôi lập luận rằng việc gia tăng các nền văn hóa thị trường và quy định đã làm hỏng niềm tin xuyên khu vực, thúc đẩy những lợi ích chia rẽ và hành vi tránh rủi ro, hạn chế quyền tự chủ địa phương, sự đổi mới và hành động cộng đồng mà chương trình Xã Hội Lớn mong muốn. Chúng tôi kết luận bằng việc nêu bật những vấn đề cần được giải quyết để đảm bảo sự hợp tác trong tương lai với các nhà cung cấp dựa vào cộng đồng; điều này bao gồm việc tập trung vào các quy trình và không gian quan hệ cho phép các sự thay thế.

Từ khóa

#niềm tin #khu vực công #khu vực thứ ba #chính sách #văn hóa tổ chức #đổi mới #hợp tác cộng đồng

Tài liệu tham khảo

ACEVO. (2011). Powerful people, responsible society: The report of the commission on big society. London: Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations. Alcock, P., & Kendall, J. (2011). Constituting the third sector: Processes of decontestation and contention under the UK Labour Government in England. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 450–469. Argyris, C., & Schõn, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A Theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Aspden, J., & Birch, D. (2005). New localism: Citizen Engagement, neighbourhoods and public services, evidence from local government. London: Local and Regional Government Research Unit ODPM. Bachmann, R. (2001). Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22, 337–365. Bachmann, R., Knights, D., & Sydow, J. (2001). Trust and control in organizational relations. Organization Studies, 22, V–VIII. Baines, S., Hardill, I., & Wilson, R. (2011). Introduction: Remixing the economy of welfare? Changing roles and relationships between the state and the voluntary and community sector. Social Policy and Society, 10(3), 337–339. Bennett, H. (2011). Exploring social and market legitimacy in the UK welfare to work industry: A case study of a third sector provider. Paper presented to 7th International Critical Management Studies Conference, July 11–13, Naples, Italy. Burnley, C., Matthews, C., & McKenzie, S. (2005). Devolution of services to children and families: The experience of NPOs in Nanaimo, British Columbia. Canada Voluntas, 16, 69–87. Cabinet Office. (2010). Building the Big Society. London: Cabinet Office. Carmel, E., & Harlock, J. (2008). Instituting the ‘third sector’ as a governable terrain: Partnership. Procurement and Performance in the UK Policy & Politics, 36, 155–171. Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). New managerialism new welfare? London: Sage. Clegg, S. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12, 147–167. Cochrane, A. (2000). Local government: Managerialism and modernization. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), New managerialism new welfare? (pp. 122–136). London: Sage. Coote, A. (2011). Big society and the new austerity. In M. Stott (Ed.), The big society challenge (pp. 82–94). Cardiff: Keystone Development Trust. Crawley, J., & Watkin, R. (2011). Crisis and contradiction. San Antonio: South West Foundation. de Man, A. P., & Roijakkers, N. (2009). Alliance governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. Long Range Planning, 42, 75–95. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. Edwards, A. (2007). Working collaboratively to build resilience: A CHAT approach. Social Policy and Society, 6, 255–264. Ellis, J. (2009). Monitoring and evaluation in the third sector: Meeting accountability and learning needs. London: Charities Evaluation Services. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13–47. Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence versus forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glennerster, H. (2003). Understanding the finance of welfare. Bristol: Policy Press. Grey, C., & Garsten, C. (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22, 229–250. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press. Hardy, C., Phillips, P., & Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations: Forms and facades of trust. In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 65–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Harvey, L. (1990). Critical social research. London: Unwin. HM Treasury and Cabinet Office. (2007) The future role of the third sector in social and economic regeneration. Final Report. London: Office of the Third Sector. Hoecht, A. (2006). Quality assurance in UK higher education: Issues of trust, control. Professional Autonomy and Accountability, 51, 541–563. Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad. Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42–63. Hoggett, P. (2004). Overcoming the desire for misunderstanding through dialogue. In S. Snape & P. Taylor (Eds.), Partnerships between health and local government (pp. 118–126). London: Frank Cass. Hoggett, P., Mayo, M., & Miller, C. (2009). The dilemmas of development work: Ethical challenges in regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2004). Managing to collaborate. London: Routledge. Jäger, U., & Beyes, T. (2010). Strategizing in NPOs: A case study on the practice of organizational change between social mission and economic rationale. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(1), 82–100. Kurunmäki, L., & Miller, P. (2004). Modernisation, partnerships and the management of risk. London: LSE Centre for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation. Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. (2009). The practice of outsourcing. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. xviii–493. Macmillan, R. (2010). The third sector delivering public services: An evidence review. Third Sector Research Centre. Working Paper 20. http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=l9qruXn%2fBN8%3d&tabid=500. Macmillan, R. (2011). ‘Supporting’ the voluntary sector in an age of austerity: The UK coalition government’s consultation on improving support for frontline civil society organisations in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 115–124. Maier, F., & Meyer, M. (2011). Managerialism and beyond: Discourses of civil society organization and their governance implications. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4), 731–756. Marsden, S. (2011). Pushed to the edge. London: Locality. Maude, F. (2010). Leading your way through a time of change. Speech to Action Planning Conference on “Leading Your Charity Through a Time of Change” June 2010, Westminster, London. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473–490. Milbourne, L. (2009). Remodelling the third sector: Advancing collaboration or competition in community based initiatives? Journal of Social Policy, 38, 277–297. Moxham, C., & Boaden, R. (2007). The impact of performance measurement in the voluntary sector: Identification of contextual and processual factors. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27, 826–845. Muehlberger, U. (2007). Hierarchical forms of outsourcing and the creation of dependency. Organization Studies, 28, 709–727. NCIA. (2011) Reports from NCIA Assemblies. Retrieved from http://www.independentaction.net/about-2/the-coalition-assembly/ncia-assembly-meeting-community-action/?utm_. Nevile, A. (2010). Drifting or holding firm? Public funding and the values of third sector organisations. Policy & Politics, 38, 531–546. O’Brien, M. (2006). Promises, promises’: The experience of the voluntary and community sector within the Liverpool children’s fund. Public Policy and Administration, 21, 82–98. Office for Civil Society. (2010). Supporting a stronger civil society. London: Cabinet Office. Pattie, C., & Johnston, R. (2011). How big is the big society? Parliamentary Affairs, 64, 403–424. Power, M. (1999). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Power, M., Scheytt, T., Soin, K., et al. (2009). Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30, 301–324. Scott, D., & Russell, L. (2001). Contracting: the experience of service delivery agencies. In M. Harris & C. Rochester (Eds.), Voluntary organisations and social policy in Britain (pp. 49–63). Palgrave: Basingstoke. Shaw, S., & Allen, J. B. (2006). ‘We actually trust the community’: Examining the dynamics of a non-profit funding relationship in New Zealand. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17, 211–220. Slocock, C. (2012). The big society audit 2012. London: Civil Exchange. Taylor, M. (2006). Communities in partnership: Developing a strategic voice. Social Policy and Society, 5, 269–279. Taylor, M. (2011). Community organising and the big society: Is Saul Alinsky turning in his grave? Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 257–265. Toynbee, P. (2011a). Big society isn’t new but the Tories are purging the past. Society Guardian 23rd May 2011, 5. Toynbee, P. (2011b). Localism bill: In pursuit of little platoons, Pickles uproots the state. The Guardian 17 May 2011. HM Treasury. (2006). Improving financial relationships with the third sector: Guidance to funders and purchasers. London: HM Treasury. Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Walgenbach, P. (2001). The production of distrust by means of producing trust. Organization Studies, 22, 693–714. Waterhouse, Price. (2005). Mapping local authority estates using the index of local conditions. London: Department of the Environment. Weeks, M. R., & Feeny, D. (2008). Outsourcing: From cost management to innovation and business value. California Management Review, 50, 127–146. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Willcocks, L. P., & Craig, A. S. (2009). Step-change: Collaborating to innovate, Reading: Logica and LSE. Zimmeck, M. (2010). The compact 10 years on: Government’s approach to partnership with the voluntary and community sector in England. Voluntary Sector Review, 1, 125–133.