From the Hagedoorn imaging technique to Kirchhoff migration and inversion

Geophysical Prospecting - Tập 49 Số 6 - Trang 629-643 - 2001
Norman Bleistein1, Samuel H. Gray2
1Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401‐1887, USA,
2Veritas DGC Inc., 715 Fifth Avenue SW, Suite 2200, Calgary, Alberta T2P 5A2, Canada

Tóm tắt

The seminal 1954 paper by J.G. Hagedoorn introduced a heuristic for seismic reflector imaging. That heuristic was a construction technique – a ‘string construction’ or ‘ruler and compass’ method – for finding reflectors as an envelope of equal traveltime curves defined by events on a seismic trace. Later, Kirchhoff migration was developed. This method is based on an integral representation of the solution of the wave equation. For decades Kirchhoff migration has been one of the most popular methods for imaging seismic data. Parallel with the development of Kirchhoff wave‐equation migration has been that of Kirchhoff inversion, which has as its objectives both structural imaging and the recovery of angle‐dependent reflection coefficients. The relationship between Kirchhoff migration/inversion and Hagedoorn's constructive technique has only recently been explored. This paper addresses this relationship, presenting the mathematical structure that the Kirchhoff approach adds to Hagedoorn's constructive method and showing the relationship between the two.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1063/1.526755

10.1190/1.1442363

BleisteinN.1987b.Kirchhoff inversion for reflector imaging and soundspeed and density variations. In:Proceedings of the First Joint EAEG/SEG Workshop on Deconvolution and Inversion. Rome Italy 1986.Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford.

10.1190/1.1438407

BleisteinN. CohenJ.K. StockwellJ.W. Jr.2001.Mathematics of Multidimensional Seismic Imaging Migration and Inversion.Springer‐Verlag Inc.

10.1046/j.1365-2478.2000.00178.x

ČervenýV.2001.Seismic Ray Theory.Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

10.1190/1.1444790

10.1190/1.1443136

DochertyP. ArtleyC. PlumleeM. SullivanM. WindelsR.2000. Tomographic migration and velocity analysis in 3D. 70th SEG meeting Calgary Canada Expanded Abstracts 938–941.

10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00541.x

10.1190/1.1444200

10.1111/j.1365-2478.1954.tb01281.x

HanitzschC.1995.Amplitude preserving prestack Kirchhoff depth migration/inversion in laterally inhomogeneous media. PhD dissertation University of Karlsruhe.

10.1190/1.1444282

De HoopM.V.1998. Asymptotic inversion: multipathing and caustics. 68th SEG meeting New Orleans USA Expanded Abstracts 1534–1537.

10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01040.x

10.1190/1.1444685

LumleyD.E. ClaerboutJ.F. BevcD.1994. Anti‐aliased Kirchhoff 3D migration. 64th SEG meeting Los Angeles USA Expanded Abstracts 1282–1285.

10.1190/1.1442364

10.1190/1.1440828

SheafferS.1999.2.5D downward continuation of the seismic wavefield using Kirchhoff data mapping. MSc thesis Colorado School of Mines Center for Wave Phenomena Research Report number CWP‐326.

ThierryP. LambaréG. XuS.1999. 3D common diffracting angle migration/inversion for AVA analysis. 69th SEG meeting Houston USA Expanded Abstracts 844–847.

ZhangY. GrayS.H. YoungJ.2001. True‐amplitude common‐offset common‐azimuth v(z) migration. 63rd EAGE conference Amsterdam The Netherlands Expanded Abstracts P066.