From social hotspots to policies for successful implementation of environmentally better technologies? The example of social life cycle assessment of oil and gas technologies in Alberta, Canada
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), 2015, Alberta’s energy reserves 2014 and supply/demand outlook 2015-2024, Alberta Energy Regulator
Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), 2018
Assefa, 2007, Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies, Technol. Soc., 29, 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.007
Benoit, 2015, Social hotspots database, supporting documentation, update 2015, Atlas - News Suppl. Earth-science Rev.
Bunio, 2013, Innovation, motivation, and fear: a. Novel perspective for unconventional oil, 11
COSIA (Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance), 2017
Duch-Brown, 2015, The diffusion of patented oil and gas technology with environmental uses: a forward patent citation analysis, Energy Policy, 83, 267, 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.001
Eisfeldt, 2017
ERA (Emissions Reduction Alberta), 2019
Faiers, 2006, Consumers attitudes towards domestic solar power systems, Energy Policy, 34, 1797, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.01.001
Gallichan-Lowe, 2018
Gates, 2011, Evolution of in situ oil sands recovery technology: what happened and what’s new? Paper SPE150686 presented at the SPE heavy oil conference and exhibition held in Kuwait City, Kuwait, 12
Government of Alberta, 2017
Government of Canada, 2017
Gross, 2018, How long does innovation and commercialization in the energy sectors take? Historical case studies of the timescale from innovation to widespread commercialization in energy supply and end use technology, Energy Policy, 123, 682, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.061
Hannouf, 2018, Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment: a case study of high density polyethylene production in Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 116, 10.1007/s11367-017-1303-1
Heeks, 2002, Information systems and developing countries: failure, success and local improvisations, Inf. Soc., 18, 101, 10.1080/01972240290075039
Hellpap, 2009
Huber, 2018, Can social norms interventions promote voluntary pro environmental action?, Environ. Sci. Policy, 89, 231, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.016
Lehmann, 2013, Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies – challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 18, 1581, 10.1007/s11367-013-0594-0
Leitch, 2019, Can the oil and gas sector enable geothermal technologies? Socio-technical opportunities and complementarity failures in Alberta, Canada. Energy Policy, 125, 384, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.046
Maas, 2011, Social impact measurement: a classification of methods, 171
Maxwell, 2019, Institutional insights on integrating social and environmental science for solutions-driven research, Environ. Sci. Policy, 101, 97, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.003
Nieuwenhout, 2001, Experience with solar home systems in developing countries: a review, Prog Photovolt: Res Appl, 9, 455, 10.1002/pip.392
Palsson, 2013, Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research, Environ. Sci. Policy, 28, 3, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.004
Ramirez, 2014, Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 19, 1515, 10.1007/s11367-014-0761-y
Ramirez, 2019, Lights and shadows of the environmental impacts of fossil-based electricity generation technologies: a contribution based on the Ecuadorian experience, Energy Policy, 125, 467, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.005
Scherer, 2019, Trade-offs between social and environmentally sustainable development goals, Environ. Sci. Policy, 90, 65, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.002
United Nation Environment Program, UNEP/SETAC, 2009
United Nation Environment Program, UNEP/SETAC, 2013
United Nations, 2016
Zhao, 2008, Technical, economic and environmental assessment of deploying advanced coal power technologies in the Chinese context, Energy Policy, 36, 2709, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.028
