From Semantic to Cognitive Information Search: The Fundamental Principles and Models of Deep Semantic Search

N. V. Maksimov1, O. L. Golitsyna1
1National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Moscow, Russia

Tóm tắt

The features of human-machine documentary search focused on information support of cognitive processes are considered. The concepts of meaning and semantic information search are analyzed. The concept of deep semantic search is introduced, considered as an interactive process with search mechanisms on knowledge graph, similar to the mechanics of consciousness/cognition operations. The concept of cognitive information search is introduced, which is considered as the construction of a path of cognition—an interactive iterative and significantly dependent on the previous result formation of a target fact on a chaotic set of found facts. The result of such a search will be (1) the selection of fragments of documents that meet the real information need (and not copies of documents that meet the expressed need, as in traditional documentary retrieval system), and (2) an interactively generated semantic graph—a conceptual image of solving the user’s problem. Mathematical models of deep semantic search on knowledge graphs were given.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Mikhailov, A.M., Chernyi, A.I., and Gilyarevskii, R.S., Osnovy informatiki (Foundations of Informatics), Moscow: Nauka, 1968. Todd, P.M., Hills, T.T., and Robbins, T.W., Search, goals, and the brain, Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012., pp. 125–156. Taylor, H., Fernandes, B., and Wraight, S., The evolution of complementary cognition: humans cooperatively adapt and evolve through a system of collective cognitive search, Cambridge Archaeol. J., 2022, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774321000329 Gualtieri, M., The Forrester wave: Cognitive search and knowledge discovery solution. https://www.forrester. com/blogs/17-06-12-cognitive_search_is_the_ai_version_ of_enterprise_search. Cited April 2, 2022. Zlatev, J., Meaning = Life (+ Culture): An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning, Evol. Commun., 2000, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 253–296. https://doi.org/10.1075/eoc.4.2.07zla Kravchenko, A.V., Methodological foundations of cognitive analysis of meaning, Kognitivnyi analiz slova (Cognitive Analysis of Word), Irkutsk: Irkutskaya Gos. Ekon. Akad., 2000. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’. Sovetskaya entsiklopediya (Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary: Soviet Encyclopedia), Il’ichev, L.F., Fedoseev, P.N., Kovalev, S.M., and Panov, V.G., Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1983. Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A., Rethinking context: An introduction, Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Duranti, A. and Goodwin, Ch., Eds., Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language, vol. 11, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 1–41. Taylor, R.S., Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries, College Res. Libr., 1968, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 178–194. Salton, G., Dynamic Information and Library Processing, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1975. Bast, H., Buchhold, B., and Haussmann, E., Semantic search on text and knowledge bases, Found. Trends Inf. Retrieval, 2016, vol. 10, nos. 2–3, pp. 119–271. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000032 Leake, D.B. and Scherle, R., Towards context-based search engine selection, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2001, pp. 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/359784.360301 Bennett, P.N., Collins-Thompson, K., Kelly, D., White, R.W., and Zhang, Y., Overview of the special issue on contextual search and recommendation, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 2015, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 1e. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691351 Belnap, N.D., Jr., and Steel, T.B., Jr., The Logic of Questions and Answers, New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press, 1976. Golitsyna, O.L., Maksimov, N.V., Okropishina, O.V., and Strogonov, V.I., The ontological approach to the identification of informationin tasks of document retrieval, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2012, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 125–132. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105512030028 Maksimov, N.V., Golitsyna, O.L., Monankov, K.V., and Gavrilkina, A.S., Methods of visual graphoanalytical representation and search of scientific and technical texts, Nauchn. Visualizatsiya, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 138–161. Cognitive search. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0% 9A%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82% D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_% D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BA. Cited April 2, 2022. Golitsyna, O.L. and Maksimov, N.V., Information retrieval models in the context of retrieval tasks, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2011, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 20–32. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105511010079 Van Dijk, T.A., et al., On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: a brief personal history of the kintsch-van dijk theory, Discourse Comprehension: Essays in Honor of Walter Kintsch, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995, pp. 383–410. Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, New York: Academic Press, 1983. Zhang, X., Yang, A., Li, S., and Wang, Y., Machine reading comprehension: a literature review, 2019. ar-Xiv:1907.01686 [cs.CL] Chen, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J., and Wang, Y., Bidirectional machine reading comprehension for aspect sentiment triplet extraction, Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 2021, vol. 35, no. 14, pp. 12666–12674. Zheng, Y., Mao, J., Liu, Y., Ye, Z., Zhang, M., and Ma, S., Human behavior inspired machine reading comprehension, SIGIR’19: Proc. 42nd Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Paris, 2019, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331231 Hyona, J., Lorch, R.F., and Kaakinen, J.K., Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: evidence from eye fixation patterns, J. Educ. Psychol., 2002, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.44 Kintsch, W. and Van Dijk, T.A., Toward a model of text comprehension and production, Psychol. Rev., 1978, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363 Shah, P., A model of the cognitive and perceptual processes in graphical display comprehension, AAAI Technical Report FS-97-03, 1997, pp. 94–101. Peirce, C.S., Existential graphs. http://www.jfsowa.com/peirce/ms514.htm. Cited October 2, 2021. Golitsina, O.L. and Gavrilkina, A.S., On one approach to the extraction of entity and relationships names in the task of building a semantic search image, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 2021, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 54–62. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105521020023 Maksimov, N.V. and Lebedev, A.A., Ontological system knowledge–activity, Ontol. Proektirovaniya, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 185–211. https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2021-11-2-185-211 Chernavskii, D.S., Sinergetika i informatsiya (Synergetics and Information), Moskva: Editorial URSS, 2004.