Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Từ Quyết Định Tự Nhiên Đến Quyết Định Đại Diện Trong Thể Thao: Một Khung Xây Dựng Quyết Định Trong Môi Trường Ảo và Tăng Cường
Tóm tắt
Quyết định là yếu tố quan trọng trong các nhiệm vụ thể thao phức tạp nhưng rất khó để kiểm tra và đào tạo. Các công nghệ mới như thực tế ảo và thực tế tăng cường mang lại cơ hội mới cho việc cải thiện khả năng ra quyết định, tuy nhiên, vẫn chưa rõ liệu việc đào tạo bằng các phương pháp mới này có giúp cải thiện khả năng ra quyết định trên sân thi đấu hay không. Để làm rõ những lợi ích tiềm năng, cần có một khái niệm rõ ràng về việc ra quyết định, đặc biệt là đối với các môn thể thao đội xâm lấn như bóng đá, bóng rổ và hockey trên cánh đồng, nơi việc ra quyết định rất phức tạp với nhiều lựa chọn có thể có. Do đó, mục tiêu của bài viết này là thiết lập một khung cho việc thiết kế các môi trường ảo và tăng cường, giúp các vận động viên trong thể thao đội xâm lấn rèn luyện khả năng ra quyết định của họ. Để đạt được điều này, chúng tôi đề xuất một khung để khái niệm hóa việc ra quyết định 'tự nhiên' trong môi trường thi đấu trong các môn thể thao đội xâm lấn, xem việc ra quyết định như một quá trình liên tục và tuần hoàn, nơi người cầm bóng tương tác với đồng đội để tạo ra 'cơ hội', và nơi những người ra quyết định có kỹ năng thường trì hoãn quyết định để tạo ra thời gian và từ đó tạo ra cơ hội mới, thay vì chọn lựa chọn đầu tiên có sẵn với họ. Trong khung này, chúng tôi phân biệt giữa việc ra quyết định và sự dự đoán, đề xuất rằng việc ra quyết định yêu cầu một loạt các phán đoán dự đoán liên tục. Dựa trên khung này, chúng tôi sau đó nêu bật những hệ quả cho việc kiểm tra và đào tạo ra quyết định bằng cách sử dụng các môi trường thực tế ảo và thực tế tăng cường, đặc biệt phác thảo những thách thức về công nghệ cần được vượt qua để việc ra quyết định tự nhiên có thể được thể hiện trong các môi trường ảo và tăng cường.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Thorpe R, Bunker D, Almond L. Rethinking games teaching. Loughborough: Loughborough University Press; 1986. p. 17–24.
Davids K, Araújo D, Correia V, Vilar L. How small-sided and conditioned games enhance acquisition of movement and decision-making skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2013;41:154–61.
De Groot AD. Thought and choice in chess. 1965.
Gorman AD, Abernethy B, Farrow D. Investigating the anticipatory nature of pattern perception in sport. Mem Cognit. 2011;39:894–901.
Gorman AD, Abernethy B, Farrow D. Evidence of different underlying processes in pattern recall and decision-making. Q J Exp Psychol. 2015;1–19.
Williams AM, Hodges NJ, North JS, Barton G. Perceiving patterns of play in dynamic sport tasks: investigating the essential information underlying skilled performance. Perception. 2006;35:317–32.
Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Philippaerts RM. Mechanisms underpinning successful decision making in skilled youth soccer players: an analysis of visual search behaviors. J Mot Behav. 2007;39:395–408.
Vaeyens R, Lenoir M, Williams AM, Mazyn L, Philippaerts RM. The effects of task constraints on visual search behavior and decision-making skill in youth soccer players. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007;29:147–69.
Oudejans RR, Michaels CF, Van DB, Frissen EJP. To cross or not to cross: the effect of locomotion on street-crossing behavior. Ecol Psychol. 2010;7413:259–67.
Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R. The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2006;7:653–76.
Dicks M, Araújo D, van der Kamp J. Perception-action for the study of anticipation and decision making. In: Anticipation and decision making in sport. 2019. p. 181–99.
Araújo D, Ludovic S, Robert H, Joao HC. Ecological cognition: expert decision-making behaviour in sport. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2019;12:1–25.
Brunswik E. Perception. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1956.
Levin Pt MF, Weiss Ot PL, Keshner Pt EA. Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles. Phys Ther. 2015;95:415–25.
Faure C, Limballe A, Bideau B, Kulpa R. Virtual reality to assess and train team ball sports performance: a scoping review. J Sports Sci. 2020;38:192–205.
Le Noury P, Polman R, Maloney M, Gorman A. A narrative review of the current state of extended reality technology and how it can be utilised in sport. Sports Med. 2022;52:1473–89.
Düking P, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. The potential usefulness of virtual reality systems for athletes: a short SWOT analysis. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1–4.
Bird JM. The use of virtual reality head-mounted displays within applied sport psychology. J Sport Psychol Action. 2020;11:115–28.
Cotterill ST. Virtual reality and sport psychology: implications for applied practice. In: Case studies in sport and exercise psychology. 2018. p. 21–2.
Stone JA, Strafford BW, North JS, Toner C, Davids K. Effectiveness and efficiency of virtual reality designs to enhance athlete development: an ecological dynamics perspective. Mov Sports Sci. 2018;2018:51–60.
Gray R. Transfer of training from virtual to real baseball batting. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1–11.
Koutitas G, Smith KS, Lawrence G, Metsis V, Stamper C, Trahan M, et al. A virtual and augmented reality platform for the training of first responders of the ambulance bus. ACM Int Conf Proc Ser. 2019;299–302.
Müller D, Mann D. Testing decision-making skills in football using augmented reality. Curr Iss Sport Sci. 2023;8(2):042–042.
Johnson JG, Raab M. Take the first: option-generation and resulting choices. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2003;91:215–29.
Raab M, Johnson JG. Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007;13:158–70.
Bruce L, Farrow D, Raynor A, Mann D. But I can’t pass that far! The influence of motor skill on decision making. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2012;13:152–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.10.005.
Roca A, Ford PR, McRobert AP, Williams AM. Perceptual-cognitive skills and their interaction as a function of task constraints in soccer. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2013;35:144–55.
Mann DL, Farrow D, Shuttleworth R, Hopwood M. The influence of viewing perspective on decision-making and visual search behaviour in an invasive sport. Int J Sport Psychol. 2009;40:546–64.
Panchuk D, Klusemann MJ, Hadlow SM. Exploring the effectiveness of immersive video for training decision-making capability in elite, youth basketball players. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1–9.
van Biemen T, Müller D, Mann DL. Virtual reality as a representative training environment for football referees. Hum Mov Sci. 2023;89: 103091.
Alguacil FP, Fernandez J, Arce PP. Seeing in to the future: using self-propelled particle models to aid player decision-making in soccer. MIT Sloan Sports Anal Conf. 2020;1–23.
Michalczyk K. How impactful are line breaking passes? 2020 OptaPro Forum. 2020.
Abernethy B, Russel D. Expert-Novice differences in an applied selective attention task. J Sport Psychol. 1987;1–492.
Mann DL, Abernethy B, Farrow D. Action specificity increases anticipatory performance and the expert advantage in natural interceptive tasks. Acta Psychol. 2010;17–23.
Jones C, Miles T. Use of advance cues in predicting the flight of a lawn tennis ball. J Hum Mov Stud. 1978;231–5.
Roca A, Ford PR, McRobert AP, Mark Williams A. Identifying the processes underpinning anticipation and decision-making in a dynamic time-constrained task. Cogn Process. 2011;12:301–10.
Shim J, Carlton LG, Chow JW, Chae WS. The use of anticipatory visual cues by highly skilled tennis players. J Mot Behav. 2005;37:164–75.
Hopwood M, Mann D, Farrow D, Nielsen T. Does visual-perceptual training augment the fielding performance of skilled cricketers? Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2011;6:523–35.
Abernethy B, Gill DP, Parks SL, Packer ST. Expertise and the perception of kinematic and situational probability information. Perception. 2001;30:233–52.
Cañal-Bruland R, Mann DL. Time to broaden the scope of research on anticipatory behavior: a case for the role of probabilistic information. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1–3.
Mann DL, Schaefers T, Cañal-Bruland R. Action preferences and the anticipation of action outcomes. Acta Psychol. 2014;152:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.07.004.
Farrow D, Reid M. The contribution of situational probability information to anticipatory skill. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15:368–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.12.007.
Gredin NV, Broadbent DP, Williams AM, Bishop DT. Judgement utility modulates the use of explicit contextual priors and visual information during anticipation. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;45: 101578.
Gredin NV, Broadbent DP, Thomas JL, Williams AM. The role of action tendencies in expert anticipation. Asian J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2023;1:30–8.
Dicks M, Davids K, Button C. Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football. Hum Mov Sci. 2010;29:401–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2010.02.008.
Le Noury P, Buszard T, Reid M, Farrow D. Examining the representativeness of a virtual reality environment for simulation of tennis performance. J Sports Sci. 2021;39:412–20.
Neumann DL, Moffitt RL, Thomas PR, Loveday K, Watling DP, Lombard CL, et al. A systematic review of the application of interactive virtual reality to sport. Virtual Real. 2018;22:183–98.
Hadlow S, Panchuk D, Lindsay D, Ronald M, Abernethy B. Modified perceptual training in sport: a new classification framework. Sports Med Aust. 2018;9:950–8.
Pinder RA, Davids K, Renshaw I, Araújo D. Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2011;33:146–55.
Kittel A, Larkin P, Elsworthy N, Spittle M. Using 360° virtual reality as a decision-making assessment tool in sport. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22:1049–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.012.
Fortes LS, Almeida SS, Praça GM, Nascimento-Júnior JRA, Lima-Junior D, Barbosa BT, et al. Virtual reality promotes greater improvements than video-stimulation screen on perceptual-cognitive skills in young soccer athletes. Hum Mov Sci. 2021;79.
Discombe RM, Bird JM, Kelly A, Blake RL, Harris DJ, Vine SJ. Effects of traditional and immersive video on anticipation in cricket: a temporal occlusion study. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2022;58: 102088.
Wood G, Wright DJ, Harris D, Pal A, Franklin ZC, Vine SJ. Testing the construct validity of a soccer-specific virtual reality simulator using novice, academy, and professional soccer players. Virtual Real. 2021;25:43–51.
Adams K, Kiefer A, Panchuk D, Hunter A, MacPherson R, Spratford W. From the field of play to the laboratory: recreating the demands of competition with augmented reality simulated sport. J Sports Sci. 2020;38:486–93.
Dessing JC, Craig CM. Bending it like Beckham: how to visually fool the goalkeeper. PLoS One. 2010;5.
Hohmann T, Obelöer H, Schlapkohl N, Raab M. Does training with 3D videos improve decision-making in team invasion sports? J Sports Sci. 2016;34:746–55.
Lorains M, Ball K, MacMahon C. An above real time training intervention for sport decision making. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14:670–4.
Gil-Arias A, Moreno MP, Garciá-Mas A, Moreno A, Garciá-González L, Del Villar F. Reasoning and action: implementation of a decision-making program in sport. Span J Psychol. 2016;19.
Raab M, Araújo D. Embodied cognition with and without mental representations: the case of embodied choices in sports. Front Microbiol. 2019;10.
Gray R. Embodied perception in sport. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2014;7:72–86.
Craig C. Understanding perception and action in sport: how can virtual reality technology help ? Sports Technol. 2014;37–41.
Weigelt M, Güldenpenning I, Steggemann-Weinrich Y, Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud M, Kunde W. Control over the processing of the opponent’s gaze direction in basketball experts. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017;24:828–34.
Kittel A, Larkin P, Cunningham I, Spittle M. 360° Virtual reality: a SWOT analysis in comparison to virtual reality. Front Psychol. 2020;11.
Furley P, Memmert D. Coaches’ implicit associations between size and giftedness: implications for the relative age effect. J Sports Sci. 2016;34:459–66.
Laakso T, Travassos B, Liukkonen J, Davids K. Field location and player roles as constraints on emergent 1-vs-1 interpersonal patterns of play in football. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;54:347–53.
Fernandez J, Bornn L. Wide open spaces: a statistical technique for measuring space creation in professional soccer. MIT Sloan Sports Anal Conf. 2018;1–19.
Fernández J, Bornn L, Cervone D. A framework for the fine-grained evaluation of the instantaneous expected value of soccer possessions. Mach Learn. 2021.
Starke S, Zhao Y, Komura T, Zaman K. Local motion phases for learning multi-contact character movements. ACM Trans Graph. 2020;39.
Decroos T, Davis J. Characterizing Soccer Players ’ Playing Style from Match Event Streams. In: Joint European conference on machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. 2019. pp. 569–84.
Stein M, Schreck T, Keim DA. Tackling similarity search for soccer match analysis: multimodal distance measure and interactive query definition. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2019;39:60–71.
Ryu D, Abernethy B, Mann DL, Poolton JM. The contributions of central and peripheral vision to expertise in basketball: how blur helps to provide a clearer picture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015;41:167–85.
Withagen R, Michaels CF. The role of feedback information for calibration and attunement in perceiving length by dynamic touch. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005;31:1379–90.