From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling
Tóm tắt
▪ Abstract Sociologists often model social processes as interactions among variables. We review an alternative approach that models social life as interactions among adaptive agents who influence one another in response to the influence they receive. These agent-based models (ABMs) show how simple and predictable local interactions can generate familiar but enigmatic global patterns, such as the diffusion of information, emergence of norms, coordination of conventions, or participation in collective action. Emergent social patterns can also appear unexpectedly and then just as dramatically transform or disappear, as happens in revolutions, market crashes, fads, and feeding frenzies. ABMs provide theoretical leverage where the global patterns of interest are more than the aggregation of individual attributes, but at the same time, the emergent pattern cannot be understood without a bottom up dynamical model of the microfoundations at the relational level. We begin with a brief historical sketch of the shift from “factors” to “actors” in computational sociology that shows how agent-based modeling differs fundamentally from earlier sociological uses of computer simulation. We then review recent contributions focused on the emergence of social structure and social order out of local interaction. Although sociology has lagged behind other social sciences in appreciating this new methodology, a distinctive sociological contribution is evident in the papers we review. First, theoretical interest focuses on dynamic social networks that shape and are shaped by agent interaction. Second, ABMs are used to perform virtual experiments that test macrosociological theories by manipulating structural factors like network topology, social stratification, or spatial mobility. We conclude our review with a series of recommendations for realizing the rich sociological potential of this approach.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Axelrod R, 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation.
Axelrod R, 1997, The Complexity of Cooperation.
Caldwell SB, 1997, Dynamic Microsimulation and the Corsim 3.0 Model.
Castelfranchi C, 1998, J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulat., 1, 3.1
Cederman L-E, 2001, Polit. Methodol., 10, xxx
Chattoe E, 1998, J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulat., 1, 2.1
Coleman JS, 1990, Foundations of Social Theory.
Conte R, Castelfranchi C. 1995. Understanding the effects of norms in social groups through simulation. InArtificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life, ed. N Gilbert, R Conte, pp. 252–67. London: UCL Press
Coveney P, 1995, Frontiers of Complexity.
Flache A, 2001, J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulat., 4, 6.1
Forrester JW, 1971, World Dynamics.
Gilbert N, 1997, Sociol. Res. Online, 2, 3.1
Gilbert N, 1999, Simulation for the Social Scientist.
Hegselmann R, 1998, J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulat., 1, 1.1
Holland J, 1995, Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity.
Homans GC, 1974, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.
Kaufman S, 1996, At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity.
MacLeod J, 1995, Ain't No Makin' It.
McAdam D, 1988, Freedom Summer.
Meadows DL, 1974, The Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World.
Meeker B, Leik R. 1997. Use of computer simulation for theory development: an evolving component of sociological research programs. InStatus,Network,and Structure: Theory Development in Group Processes, ed. J Szmatka, J Skvoretz, J Berger, pp. 47–70. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
Nowak A, Vallacher RR. 1998. Toward computational social psychology: cellular automata and neural network models of interpersonal dynamics. InConnectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior, ed. SJ Read, LC Miller, pp. 277–311. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Pedone R, Parisi D. 1997. In what kind of social groups can ‘altruistic’ behaviors evolve? InSimulating Social Phenomena, ed. R Conte, R Hegselmann, P Terna, pp. 195–201. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Resnick M, 1997, Termites Turtles and Traffic Jams.
Rummelhart D, 1988, Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition.
Saam NJ, 1999, J. Artificial Soc. Soc. Simulat., 2, 2.1
Sawyer K. 2001. Artificial societies and the micro-macro link in sociological theory. Unpublished manuscript, Washington Univ.
Shibutani T, 1978, Derelicts of Company K: A Sociological Study of Demoralization.
Simon H, 1998, The Sciences of the Artificial.
Willis P, 1977, Learning to Labor.