From Credit to Collective Action: The Role of Microfinance in Promoting Women's Social Capital and Normative Influence

American Sociological Review - Tập 74 Số 4 - Trang 529-550 - 2009
Paromita Sanyal1
1 Wesleyan University.

Tóm tắt

Can economic ties positively influence social relations and actions? If so, how does this influence operate? Microfinance programs, which provide credit through a group-based lending strategy, provide the ideal setting for exploring these questions. This article examines whether structuring socially isolated women into peer-groups for an explicitly economic purpose, such as access to credit, has any effect on the women's collective social behavior. Based on interviews with 400 women from 59 microfinance groups in West Bengal, India, I find that one third of these groups undertook various collective actions. Improvements in women's social capital and normative influence fostered this capacity for collective action. Several factors contributed to these transformations, including economic ties among members, the structure of the group network, and women's participation in group meetings. Based on these findings, I argue that microfinance groups have the potential to promote women's social capital and normative influence, thereby facilitating women's collective empowerment. I conclude by discussing the need for refining our understanding of social capital and social ties that promote normative influence.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1108/eb013319

10.2307/1960858

Banfield Edward C., 1958, The Moral Basis of a Backward Society

Bourdieu Pierre, 1992, Invitation to Reflexive Sociology

10.4159/9780674029095

Cassar Alessandra, 2008, “Does Social Capital Matter? Evidence from a Five-Country Group Lending Experiment.”

Coleman James S., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory

Cook Karen, 2001, Social Norms, 327

10.2307/2089716

10.1016/0305-750X(95)00124-U

Goffman Erving, 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior

10.1086/228311

10.1016/0305-750X(95)00159-A

Hechter Michael, 1987, Principles of Group Solidarity

Horne Christine, 2001, Social Norms, 3

10.1353/sof.2004.0041

John Mary E., 2005, Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power, and Politics, 107

Kabeer Naila, 1998, “Money Can't Buy Me Love?” Re-evaluating Gender, Credit and Empowerment in Rural Bangladesh

10.2307/2095641

Krishna Anirudh, 1997, Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development, 255

Krishna Anirudh, 2000, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 71

10.7312/kris12570

10.1017/CBO9780511815447

Marx Karl, 1987, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte

Miles Mathew B., 1984, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods

10.2307/3177922

10.1257/jel.37.4.1569

10.1016/0305-750X(89)90201-5

10.2307/1958269

Opp Karl-Dieter, 2001, Social Norms, 234

10.1177/0951692894006004006

Ostrom Elinor, 2003, Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research

10.1086/503580

10.1086/230191

Putnam Robert D., 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy

Rahman Aminur, 2001, Women and Microcredit in Rural Bangladesh: An Anthropological Study of Grameen Bank Lending

Ray Raka, 1999, Fields of Protest: Women's Movement in India

10.2307/2952260

10.1080/09614529853774

Sen Amartya K., 1999, Development as Freedom

Sun Yat-sen, 1927, San Min Chu I: The Three Principles of the People

Turner Jonathan H., 2000, Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, 94

10.1353/wp.2001.0012

Wijayaratna C. M., 1997, Reasons for Hope: Instructive Experiences in Rural Development, 166

10.1023/A:1006884930135

10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00106-2

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

American Sociological Review

Tập 74 Số 4

529-550

Thông tin tác giả