Frankfurt cases: the fine-grained response revisited
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Clarke, R. (2014). Omissions: Agency, metaphysics, and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fischer, J. M. (1986). Responsibility and failure. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86, 251–270.
Fischer, J. M. (1994). The metaphysics of free will: An essay on control. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fischer, J. M. & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Frankfurt, H. (1969). Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. Journal of Philosophy, 66, 829–839.
Kane, R. (1996). The significance of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mele, A., & Robb, D. (2003). Bbs, magnets and seesaws: The metaphysics of Frankfurt-style cases. In D. Widerker & M. McKenna (Eds.), Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities: Essays on the importance of alternative possibilities (pp. 107–126). Farnham: Ashgate.
Naylor, M. (1984). Frankfurt on the principle of alternate possibilities. Philosophical Studies, 46, 249–258.
O’Connor, T. (2000). Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, M. (2012). Modified Frankfurt-type examples and the flickers of freedom. Philosophical Studies, 157, 177–194.
Robinson, M. (2014). The limits of limited blockage Frankfurt-style cases. Philosophical Studies, 169, 429–446.
Speak, D. (2002). Fanning the flickers of freedom. American Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 91–105.
Stump, E. (1999). Alternative possibilities and moral responsibility: The flicker of freedom. The Journal of Ethics, 3, 299–324.
Swenson, P. (2015). A challenge for frankfurt-style compatibilists. Philosophical Studies, 172, 1279–1285.
Swenson, P. (2016). The frankfurt cases and responsibility for omissions. The Philosophical Quarterly, 66(264), 579–595.
van Inwagen, P. (1983). An essay on free will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. (2000). Does libertarian freedom require alternative possibilities? Philosophical Perspectives, 14, 231–248.