Fragility analysis of a subway station structure by incremental dynamic analysis

Advances in Structural Engineering - Tập 20 Số 7 - Trang 1111-1124 - 2017
Tong Liu1, Zhiyi Chen1,2, Yong Yuan2, Xiaoyun Shao3
1Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
2State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
3Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

Tóm tắt

Fragility analysis constitutes the basis in seismic risk assessment and performance-based earthquake engineering during which the probability of a structure response exceeding a certain limit state at a given seismic intensity is sought to relate seismic intensity and structural vulnerability. In this article, the seismic vulnerability assessment of a subway station structure is investigated using a probabilistic method. The Daikai subway station was selected as an example structure and its seismic responses are modeled according to the nonlinear incremental dynamic analysis procedure. The limit states are defined in terms of the deformation and waterproof performance of the subway station structure based on the central column drift angle and the structural tension damage distribution obtained from the incremental dynamic analysis. Fragility curves were developed at those limit states and the probability of exceedance at the limit states of operational, slight damage, life safety, and collapse prevention was determined for the two seismic hazard levels. Results reveal that the proposed fragility analysis implementation procedure to the subway station structure provides an effective and reliable seismic vulnerability analysis method, which is essential for these underground structural systems considering their high potential risk during seismic events.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

ABAQUS, 2010, Users Manual

10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.09.010

10.1080/15732479.2015.1009124

10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.002

10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.013

10.1617/s11527-014-0250-6

10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.024

Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC), 2004, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures (FEMA 450). Part 1: Provisions and Part 2: Commentary, 2003

10.1007/s11069-012-0437-5

10.1260/1369-4332.17.9.1343

Elnashai AS, 2010, Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering

FEMA-273, 1997, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings

FEMA-351, 2000, Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings

Filippou FC, 1983, Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints

GB50011, 2010, Code for Seismic Design of Buildings

GB50157, 2013, Code for Design of Metro

Guo ZH, 1988, Journal of Building Structures, 4, 45

10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7

10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1522)

Jalayer F, 2004, A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats

10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.009

Kawashima K, 1994, Seismic Design of Underground Structures

10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.11.001

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

10.1007/s11431-013-5430-z

10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4

10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.08.003

Menegotto M, 1973, Proceedings of the symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, 15

Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2000, PEER Strong Motion Database

10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.003

Parra-Montesinos GJ, 2006, ACI Structural Journal, 103, 113

Shome N, 1999, Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures

10.1002/eqe.141

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Advances in Structural Engineering

Tập 20 Số 7

1111-1124

Thông tin tác giả