Fracture toughness anisotropy in shale

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth - Tập 121 Số 3 - Trang 1706-1729 - 2016
Michael Chandler1,2, P. G. Meredith2, Nicolas Brantut2, Brian Crawford3
1Now at School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2Rock and Ice Physics Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
3ExxonMobil URC, Houston, Texas, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe use of hydraulic fracturing to recover shale gas has focused attention on the fundamental fracture properties of gas‐bearing shales, but there remains a paucity of available experimental data on their mechanical and physical properties. Such shales are strongly anisotropic, so that their fracture propagation trajectories depend on the interaction between their anisotropic mechanical properties and the anisotropic in situ stress field in the shallow crust. Here we report fracture toughness measurements on Mancos shale determined in all three principal fracture orientations: Divider, Short Transverse, and Arrester, using a modified short‐rod methodology. Experimental results for a range of other sedimentary and carbonate rocks are also reported for comparison purposes. Significant anisotropy is observed in shale fracture toughness measurements at ambient conditions, with values, as high as 0.72 MPa m1/2 where the crack plane is normal to the bedding, and values as low as 0.21 MPa m1/2 where the crack plane is parallel to the bedding. For cracks propagating nonparallel to bedding, we observe a tendency for deviation toward the bedding‐parallel orientation. Applying a maximum energy release rate criterion, we determined the conditions under which such deviations are more or less likely to occur under more generalized mixed‐mode loading conditions. We find for Mancos shale that the fracture should deviate toward the plane with lowest toughness regardless of the loading conditions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abou‐Sayed A.(1977) Fracture toughness of triaxially loaded Indiana limestone paper presented at 18th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics Energy Resources and Excavation Technology.

American Society for Testing and Materials, 2002, D2938‐95 Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens, ASTM Book of Standards

10.1007/BF00019921

Barker L. andR.Guest(1978) Compliance calibration of the short rod fracture toughness specimen Rep. TR‐78‐20 Terra Tek Salt Lake City Utah.

Bartsch M., 2004, Fracture parameters of chevron‐notched AL2O3/Nb sandwich specimens, Int. J. Mater. Res., 95, 779, 10.1515/ijmr-2004-0146

10.1029/2003GL017929

10.1190/1.2813433

Burns C., 2011, Shale Gas: Challenging the Frontiers of E and P

Chidsey T. andC.Morgan(2010) Utah Shale Gas Activity Update 2010 paper presented at EMD Annual Leadership Meeting—Gas Shale Committee Report Energy Minerals Division AAPG Tulsa.

10.1016/0013‐7944(87)90118‐4

Costin L., 1981, Static and Dynamic Fracture Behaviour of Oil Shale, 169

10.1007/BF00012619

10.1016/0148‐9062(94)00051‐4

10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.12.015

Eseme E., 2007, Oil Shale, 159

10.1016/S0013‐7944(00)00061‐8

10.1520/CCA10322J

10.1002/nag.163

10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9

10.1520/STP32727S

10.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7

10.1016/0148-9062(88)91871-2

Kennedy A.(2011) Geologic Predictors of the hydrocarbon extraction potential of the Mancos Shale PhD thesis Univ. of Utah Utah.

10.1029/95GL02547

King F.(2013) An investigation into the porosity of the Mancos Shale UCL Master's thesis Univ. College London London.

10.1016/S0148‐9062(97)00324‐0

10.1017/CBO9780511623127

10.1002/2014JB011358

10.1016/0148‐9062(94)90463‐4

Longman M., 2005, Defining and Characterizing Mesaverde and Mancos Sandstone Reservoirs Based on Interpretation of Formation Microimager (FMI) Logs

10.2110/jsr.2009.092

Mclennan J., 1983, Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, 63

Meredith P. G., 1989, Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy: Test Methods for Concrete and Rock, 265

10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.06.016

10.1346/CCMN.1981.0290402

10.1007/BF00038891

10.1016/0148‐9062(89)90521‐4

Paterson M., 2005, Experimental Rock Deformation—The Brittle Field, Minerals and Rocks

10.1029/JB095iB07p11345

10.1029/2000JB000058

Sarker R. andM.Batzle(2010) Anisotropic elastic moduli of the Mancos B Shale—An Experimental Study paper presented at 2010 SEG Annual Meeting Denver Colo. 17–22 Oct.

Schamel S., 2005, Shale Gas Reservoirs of Utah: Survey of an Unexploited Potential Energy Resource

10.2172/7119762

10.1016/0148‐9062(77)90740‐9

10.1190/geo2013‐0050.1

10.1016/0020-7683(91)90208-W

Terratek(2008) Deeptrek phase 1 and 2—Improving deep drilling performance—An industry/DOE program to develop and benchmark advanced diamond product drill bits and HP/HT drilling fluids to significantly improve rates of penetration U.S. Dept. of Energy ‐ DE‐FC26‐02NT41657 Terratek Salt Lake City Utah.

Thiercelin M. R.Jeffrey andK. B.Naceur(1989) Influence of fracture toughness on the geometry of hydraulic fractures SPE‐16431‐PA presented at SPE Production Engineering pp. 435–442 Soc. of Petrol. Eng.

10.1190/1.1442051

Tsvankin I., 2001, Seismic Signatures and Analysis of Reflection Data in Anisotropic Media

Vanichkobchinda P., 2007, Numerical simulation of the dynamic breakage testing of sandstone. Part I: Development of homogeneous constitutive model for the fragmentation analysis in sandstone, Int. J. Mater. Struct. Reliab., 5, 29

10.1007/BF01174501

10.1190/1.1512743

10.1190/1.1512787

Warpinski N., 1990, Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing, 57

Weinberger R., 1994, Rock Mechanics, 435

10.1007/s00603‐013‐0465‐9

Young C. N.Patti andB.Trent(1982) Stratigraphic variations in oil‐shale fracture properties US DOE Rep. of Invest. DOE/LC/RI‐82‐5 Dept. of Energy Laramie Wyoming.

10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00032-1

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Tập 121 Số 3

1706-1729

Thông tin tác giả