Four Dthats

Almog, J. (1981). Dthis and Dthat: Indexicality goes beyond that. Philosophical Studies, 39, 347–381. Amaral, P., Roberts, C., & Smith, E. A. (2007). Review of the logic of conventional implicatures by Chris Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 707–749. Arnold, D. (2007). Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 271–309. Borg, E. (2000). Complex demonstratives. Philosophical Studies, 74, 193–219. Braun, D. (1994). Structured characters and complex demonstratives. Philosophical Studies, 97, 229–249. Braun, D. (1996). Demonstratives and their linguistic meanings. Nous, 30, 145–173. Braun, D. (2008). Complex demonstratives and their singular contents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, 57–99. Burton-Roberts, N. (1999). Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In P. Collins & D. Lee (Eds.), The clause in English (pp. 33–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Caplan, B. (2003). Putting things in context. Philosophical Review, 112(2), 191–214. Collins, J. (2007). Syntax, more or less. Mind, 116, 805–850. Cresswell, M. J. (2002). Why propositions have no structure. Nous, 36, 643–662. Dever, J. (2001). Complex demonstratives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24, 271–330. Egan, A. (2009). Billboards, bombs and shotgun weddings. Synthese, 166, 251–279. Fabb, N. (1990). The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 57–78. Gauker, C. (2014). How many bare demonstratives are there in English? Linguistics and Philosophy, 37, 291–314. Ginzburg, J. (1996). Interrogatives: Questions, facts, and dialogue. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 385–422). Oxford: Blackwell. Haegeman, L. (1988). Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In S. Chiba, A. Ogawa, Y. Fuiwara, N. Yamada, O. Koma, & T. Yagi (Eds.), Aspects of modern English linguistics (pp. 232–254). Tokyo: Kaitakushi. Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. Kanterian, E. (2009). Puzzles about descriptive names. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 409–428. Kaplan, D. (1989a). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, et al. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kaplan, D. (1989b). Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, et al. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 565–614). Oxford: Oxford University Press. King, J. (2007). The nature and structure of content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. King, J. (2017). Structured propositions. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab. King, J., & Stanley, J. (2005). Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Z. Szabo (Ed.), Semantics versus pragmatics (pp. 111–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Koev, T. (2013). Apposition and the structure of discourse. Dissertation, Rutgers University. McCawley, J. (1988). Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 91–106. Mount, A. (2008). The impurity of ‘pure’ indexicals. Philosophical Studies, 138, 193–209. Pickel, B. (2017). Structured propositions in a generative grammar. Mind, 128, 329–366. Pickel, B., Rabern, B., & Dever, J. (2018). Reviving the parameter revolution in semantics. In D. Ball & B. Rabern (Eds.), The science of meaning: Essays on the metatheory of natural language semantics (pp. 138–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Potts, C. (2003). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Predelli, S. (2005). Meaning without truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Predelli, S. (2012). Bare boned demonstratives. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(3), 547–562. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT Press. Rabern, B. (2013). Monsters in Kaplan’s logic of demonstratives. Philosophical Studies, 164, 393–404. Rabern, B., & Ball, D. (2017). Monsters and the theoretical role of context. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 98, 392–416. Rey, G. (1992). Semantic externalism and conceptual competence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 92, 315–333. Salmon, N. (1986). Frege’s puzzle. Atascadero: Ridgeview. Salmon, N. (2002). Demonstrating and necessity. Philosophical Review, 111(4), 497–537. Schlenker, P. (2003). A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 29–120. Schlenker, P. (2013). Supplements without bidimensionalism. Manuscript. Simons, M., Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., & Roberts, C. (2010). What projects and why. Proceedings of SALT, 20, 309–327. Soames, S. (1987). Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content. Philosophical Topics, 15, 47–87. Soames, S. (2012). Philosophy of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Stalnaker, R. (2014). Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stevens, G. (2009). Utterance at a distance. Philosophical Studies, 143, 213–221.