Fostering Systematic Innovative Thinking and Problem Solving: Lessons Education Can Learn From Industry
Tóm tắt
This article aims to illuminate different means of nurturing creativity in the high-tech industry and in modern organizations, particularly in the context of problem solving and product development, and to examine the potential implications for technology education. There is a large gap between conventional wisdom, which maintains that technology education is intended to foster creative thinking among pupils, and reality in the field. The case study presented is that of a mid-sized Israeli industrial plant, dealing with the design and production of construction tools for professionals and domestic use, such as spirit levels, measuring tapes, squares and rulers. This plant utilized innovation, uniqueness and quality as the main instruments in the battle for the market. A series of workshops for the plant's staff, entitled ‘Systematic Inventive Thinking’, resulted in the development of a range of new, original and successful products. The cumulative experience indicated that people can learn efficient techniques for solving a problem, or developing a new product, by breaking it down to its basic components, by ‘playing' systematically with ideas, in order to achieve new results. The notion that methodical courses can trigger pupils' incentive to be innovative and original, and can foster teamwork is almost absent from the field of education. Educators and scholars in technology education pay little regard to teaching and exploiting methods to fostering systematic original thinking and problem-solving. The challenge in education is to find an optimal combination and balance between fostering activity based on openness and ‘disorder’, on the one hand, and imparting systematic methods for innovative thinking and problem-solving, on the other.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Altshuller, G. S.: 1988, Creativity as an Exact Science, Gordon and Breach, New York.
Amabile, T. M.: 1997, ‘Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do’, California Management Review 40(1) (Fall), 39–58.
Atkinson, S.: 2000, ‘The Development of Creativity Versus the Need for High Levels of Performance in Design and Technology’, The International Conference of Scholars on Technology Education, Brounschweig, Germany, September 24–27.
Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y.: 1999, ‘Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) Program for Creative Thinking into a Project-based Technology Curriculum’, Research in Science and Technology Education 17(2), 139–151.
Barak, M. & Raz, E.: 2000, ‘Hot-air Balloons: Project-centered Study as a Bridge between Science and Technology Education’, Science Education 84(1), 27–42.
Dasgupta, D.: 1996, Technology and Creativity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
De Bono, E.: 1986, The CoRT Thinking Program, 2nd Edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
De Bono, E.: 1990, Lateral Thinking, Ward Lock Educational, London.
De Bono, E.: 1992, Serious Creativity, HarperCollins Publications, New York.
Dick, W., & Carey, L.: 1996, The Systematic Design of Instruction (4th ed.), HarperCollins Publications, New York.
Ennis, R. H.: 1989, ‘Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research’, Educational Researcher 18(3), 4–10.
Fisher, T.: 1997, ‘The Designer's Self-identity – Myths of Creativity and the Management of Teams’, Creativity and Innovation Management 6(1), 10–18.
Gentile, J. R.: 1997, Education Psychology (2nd ed), Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA.
Gibney, K.: 1998, ‘Awakening Creativity’, ASEE Prism 7(7), 18–23.
Glaser, R.: 1993, ‘Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge’, in R. McCormick, P. Murphy & M. Harrison (eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology, Addison-Wesley in association with The Open University, Wokingham, England, 91–111
Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D.: 1999, ‘The Voice of the Product: Templates of New Product Emergence’, Creativity and Innovation Management 8(3), 157–164.
Goldenberg, J., Mazurski, D. & Solonmon, S.: 1999, ‘Creative Sparks’, Science 285(5433), 1495–1496.
Guilford, J. P.: 1963, ‘Intellectual Resources and their Values as Seen by Scientists’, in Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development, Wiley, New York.
Hamel, G.: 1997, ‘Killer Strategies that Make Shareholders Rich’, Fortune 23 (June), 73.
Harman, W. & Rheingold, H.: 1984, Higher Creativity, Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, New York.
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M.: 1998, ‘Reward, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity’, American Psychologist 53, 674–675.
Hill, A. M.: 1998, ‘Problem Solving in Real-life Contexts: An Alternative for Design in Technology Education’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8(3), 203–220.
Hong, J. H. & Sheu S. W.: 1999, ‘The Development of Technological Creativity through Project Work’, Creativity and Innovation Management 8(4), 269–280.
Horowitz, R. & Maimon, O.: 1997, ‘Creative Design Methodology and the SIT Method’, The ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, California.
Horowitz, R. & Maimon, O.: 1999, Systematic Inventive Thinking, http://www.sitsite.com/.
Johnson, S. D.: 1997, ‘Learning Technological Concepts and Developing Intellectual Skills’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1), 161–180.
Kanter. R. M., Kao, J. & Wiersema, F.: 1997, Innovation: Breakthrough Thinking at 3M, DuPont, GE, Pfizer and Rubbermaid, Harper Business Press, New York.
Lewis, T.: 1999, ‘Research in Technology Education – Some Areas of Need’, Journal of Technology Education 10(2), 41–56.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B.: 1989, Designing Qualitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Mazur, G.: 1995, Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) http://www.mazur.net/ triz/index.html.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessy, S.: 1994, ‘Problem Solving Processes in Technology Education: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 5–34.
Pacey, A.: 1992, The Maze of Ingenuity: Ideas and Idealism in the Development of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Panits, B.: 1998, ‘Brain Storms’, ASEE Prism 7(7), 24–29.
Perkins, D. N. & Salomon, G.: 1989, ‘Are Cognitive Skills Context-bound?’, Educational Researcher 18(1), 16–95.
Rothenberg, A.: 1990, Creativity and Madness, The Johns Hopkins University Press, London.
Rosenbaum, J.: 2001, ‘Practical Creativity: Lateral Thinking Techniques Applied to Television Production Education’, International Journal of Engineering Education 17(1), 17–23.
Rowland, G.: 1995, ‘Instructional Design and Creativity: A Response to the Criticized’, Educational Technology 35(5), 17–22.
Smmonline: 2001, ‘Bringing Creativity To Your Company’, http://www.smmonline.com/ brainstorm/club/buzz_home.htm.
Stacey, R. D.: 1992, Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Standler, R. B.: 1998, Creativity in Science and Engineering, MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS.
Sternberg, R. J.: 1988, The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sternberg, R. J. (ed.): 1999, Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Torrance, E. P.: 1962, Guiding Creative Talent, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Torrance, E. P.: 1988, ‘The Nature of Creativity as Manifest in its Testing’, in R. J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 43–75.
Trochim W. M. K.: 1999, Concept Mapping for Organizational Creativity, http://www.conceptsystems. com/papers/whitepapers/creative/creative.htm.
Tylor, C. W.: 1988, ‘Various Approaches to and Definitions of Creativity’, in R. J. Sternberg (ed.), The Nature of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 99–124.
Willis, J.: 1995, ‘A Recursive, Reflective Instructional Design Model Based on Constructivistinterpretivist Theory’, Educational Technology 35(6), 5–23.
Yin, R. K.: 1994, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.