Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme

Journal of Applied Logic - Tập 8 - Trang 1-21 - 2010
Douglas Walton1
1Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation and Rhetoric, University of Windsor

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bench-Capon, 2003, Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 429, 10.1093/logcom/13.3.429 Bex, 2003, Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalizations, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12, 125, 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a DeMorgan, 1847 Foot, 2005, Celebrity chef brings sealers to the boil, National Post, A10 Gordon, 1995 Gordon, 2005, A computational model of argument for legal reasoning support systems, 53 Gordon, 2006, The Carneades argumentation framework: Using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions, 195 Grennan, 1997 Arthur C. Hastings, A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation, Evanston, Illinois, Ph.D. Dissertation, 1963 Kienpointner, 1992 Perelman, 1969 Pollock, 1995 Prakken, 2005, AI & law, and argument schemes, Argumentation, 19, 303, 10.1007/s10503-005-4418-7 Prakken, 1996, A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4, 331, 10.1007/BF00118496 Prakken, 1997, Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities, Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 7, 25, 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900 Prakken, 2003, The three faces of defeasibility in the law, Ratio Juris, 16, 495 Reed, 2003 Reed Reed, 2005, Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11, 173, 10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x Reiter, 1987, Nonmonotonic reasoning, Annual Review of Computer Science, 2, 147, 10.1146/annurev.cs.02.060187.001051 Rescher, 1976 van Eemeren, 2004 Verheij, 1999, Logic, context and valid inference, 109 Verheij, 2001, Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes, 225 Verheij, 2003, Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 167, 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36 Verheij, 2003, DefLog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 319, 10.1093/logcom/13.3.319 Verheij, 2005 Walton, 1995 Walton, 1998 Walton, 2002, Are some modus ponens arguments deductively invalid?, Informal Logic, 22, 19 Walton, 2005, Justification of argumentation schemes, The Australasian Journal of Logic, 3, 1, 10.26686/ajl.v3i0.1769 Walton, 2006 Walton, 2005, Critical questions in computational models of legal argument, 103