Bench-Capon, 2003, Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 429, 10.1093/logcom/13.3.429
Bex, 2003, Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalizations, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12, 125, 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a
DeMorgan, 1847
Foot, 2005, Celebrity chef brings sealers to the boil, National Post, A10
Gordon, 1995
Gordon, 2005, A computational model of argument for legal reasoning support systems, 53
Gordon, 2006, The Carneades argumentation framework: Using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions, 195
Grennan, 1997
Arthur C. Hastings, A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation, Evanston, Illinois, Ph.D. Dissertation, 1963
Kienpointner, 1992
Perelman, 1969
Pollock, 1995
Prakken, 2005, AI & law, and argument schemes, Argumentation, 19, 303, 10.1007/s10503-005-4418-7
Prakken, 1996, A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4, 331, 10.1007/BF00118496
Prakken, 1997, Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities, Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 7, 25, 10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900
Prakken, 2003, The three faces of defeasibility in the law, Ratio Juris, 16, 495
Reed, 2003
Reed
Reed, 2005, Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11, 173, 10.1007/s10458-005-1729-x
Reiter, 1987, Nonmonotonic reasoning, Annual Review of Computer Science, 2, 147, 10.1146/annurev.cs.02.060187.001051
Rescher, 1976
van Eemeren, 2004
Verheij, 1999, Logic, context and valid inference, 109
Verheij, 2001, Legal decision making as dialectical theory construction with argumentation schemes, 225
Verheij, 2003, Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 167, 10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36
Verheij, 2003, DefLog: on the logical interpretation of prima facie justified assumptions, Journal of Logic and Computation, 13, 319, 10.1093/logcom/13.3.319
Verheij, 2005
Walton, 1995
Walton, 1998
Walton, 2002, Are some modus ponens arguments deductively invalid?, Informal Logic, 22, 19
Walton, 2005, Justification of argumentation schemes, The Australasian Journal of Logic, 3, 1, 10.26686/ajl.v3i0.1769
Walton, 2006
Walton, 2005, Critical questions in computational models of legal argument, 103