Forest recovery in an Australian amenity landscape: implications for biodiversity conservation on small-acreage properties

Biodiversity and Conservation - Tập 27 - Trang 69-90 - 2017
John Meadows1, John Herbohn1, Nick Emtage2
1Tropical Forests and People Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia
2Quality, Planning and Analytics, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Tóm tắt

Some urbanising rural (i.e. ‘amenity’) landscapes have seen an increase in forest cover over recent decades. Small-acreage landowners are key stakeholders in this forest recovery and its future ecological trajectory. Using 17 qualitative case-studies of small-acreage properties located in the Noosa hinterland in south-east Queensland, this study explores the types and condition of forests on these properties, the landholder’s differing forest management perspectives, practices and outcomes, and the implications for local biodiversity conservation. The properties contained a diverse mix of managed and un-managed natural and planted forests. Invasive weed species were a common component. Protecting and enhancing the ecological values of amenity landscapes will require an increase in active, best-practice forest management on small-acreage properties. Small-acreage landowners will require greater access to labour support and other subsidised resources to implement recommended practices. Such practices include controlling and reducing the spread of invasive weeds and soil erosion, reducing fire hazards, and positively influencing the rate and pathway of succession in regrowth forests. Peer-mentoring programs incorporating guided tours of ‘model’ small-acreage forests, and supporting landowners to establish their own small native plant nurseries and engage with local community nurseries (i.e. supplying seeds, volunteering labour), could help to increase small-acreage landowners’ forest management interests, knowledge, skills and activity. Long-term cooperative, cross-boundary forest management projects with on-going monitoring and adaptive management guided or implemented by skilled professionals are needed in amenity landscapes, particularly to increase the success of restoration interventions in weed-dominated regrowth forests. There is also a need for long-term socio-ecological analyses of amenity landscapes’ diverse and evolving small-acreage forests to better inform their future management.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams J, Gosnell H, Gill N, Klepeis P (2012) Re-creating the rural, reconstructing nature: an international literature review of the environmental implications of amenity migration. Conserv Soc 10(3):270–284 Argent N (2002) From pillar to post? In search of the post-productivist countryside in Australia. Aust Geogr 33(1):97–114 Barr N (2009) The house on the hill: the transformation of Australia’s farming communities. Land and Water Australia, Canberra Burnley I, Murphy P (2004) Sea change: movement from metropolitan to Arcadian Australia. University of NSW Press, Sydney Burrows D (2004) Native vegetation in the Noosa Shire. In: Haslam S (ed) Noosa’s Native Plants. Noosa Integrated Catchment Association, Tewantin, pp 366–367 Catterall CP, Harrison DA (2006) Rainforest restoration activities in Australia’s tropics and subtropics. Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management. Rainforest CRC, Cairns Commonwealth of Australia (2012) Lowland rainforest and landholders: Protecting the critically endangered Lowland Rainforest of Subtropical Australia. Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australia Compas E (2007) Measuring ex-urban change in the American West: a case study in Gallatin County, Montana, 1973–2004. Landsc Urban Plan 82(2007):56–65 Cooke B, Lane R (2015) How do amenity migrants learn to be environmental stewards of rural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 134:43–52 Cooke B, Moon K (2015) Aligning ‘public good’ environmental stewardship with the landscape-scale: adapting MBIs for private land conservation policy. Ecol Econ 114:152–158 Curry D, Reid R (2009) Peer Group Mentors contribute to diversified, sustainable and innovative farming communities. Paper presented at the Australasia-Pacific Extension Network 5th International Conference, Busselton, Western Australia, 9–12 November 2009 Dwyer J, Childs G (2004) Movement of people across the landscape: a blurring of distinctions between areas, interests and issues affecting natural resource management. Landsc Urban Plan 69(2–3):153–164 Edols-Meeves M, Knox S (1996) Rural residential development—At what cost (The impact on the North Coast of NSW). Austr Plan 33(1):25–29 Eisenhardt K, Graebner M (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad Manag J 50(1):25–32 Emtage N, Herbohn J (2012) Implications of landholders’ management goals, use of information and trust of others for the adoption of recommended practices in the Wet Tropics region of Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 107(4):351–360 Emtage N, Herbohn J, Harrison S (2007) Landholder profiling and typologies for natural resource management policy and program support: potential and constraints. Environ Manag 40(3):481–492 EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) Regional Ecosystem Description Database, QLD Government. https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/plants-animals/plants/ecosystems/ Accessed 12 Dec 2016 Epanchin-Niell R, Hufford M, Aslan C, Sexton J, Port J, Waring T (2010) Controlling invasive species in complex social landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 8(4):210–216 Erickson D, Ryan R, De Young R (2002) Woodlots in the rural landscape: landowner motivations and attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study. Landsc Urban Plan 58(1–2):101–112 FNCC (Far North Coast County Council) (1998) Camphor Laurel on the North Coast of NSW: a study of community attitudes to the potential for declaration of Camphor Laurel as a noxious weed. FNCC, Casino Freebody K (2007) Rainforest. Ecol Manag Restor 8(2):140–143 Gill N, Klepeis P, Chisholm L (2010) Stewardship among lifestyle oriented rural landowners. J Environ Plan Manag 53(3):317–334 Grau H, Hernandez M, Gutierrez J, Gasparri N, Casavecchia M, Flores-Ivaldi E, Paolini L (2008) A peri-urban neo-tropical forest transition and its consequences for environmental services. Ecol Soc 13(1):35 Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development of biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15(6):1893–1905 Hobbs R, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron J, Bridgewater P, Cramer V, Epstein P, Ewel J, Klink C, Lugo A, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson D, Sanderson E, Valladeres F, Vila M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:1–7 Hollier C, Reid M (2007) Small Lifestyle Farms: Improving delivery mechanisms for sustainable land management. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Report No. 07/098, Canberra Holmes J (2006) Impulses towards a multi-functional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J Rural Stud 22(2):142–160 Kanowski J, Catterall CP, Neilan W (2008) The potential value of weedy regrowth for rainforest restoration: the case of Camphor Laurel in north-east New South Wales. Ecol Manag Restor 9:88–99 Klepeis P, Gill N, Chisolm L (2009) Emerging amenity landscapes: invasive weeds and land sub-division in rural Australia. Land Use Policy 26(2):380–392 Knoote T, Schulte L, Rickenbach M (2010) Oak conservation and restoration on private forestlands: negotiating a social-ecological landscape. Environ Manag 45:155–164 Kristensen SP (1999) Agricultural land use and landscape changes in Rostrup, Denmark: processes of intensification and extensification. Landsc Urban Plan 46(1–3):117–123 Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multi-scaled approach. Island Press, Washington Low T (2001) Feral future: the untold story of Australia’s exotic invaders. Penguin Books, Victoria Lugo A, Helmer E (2004) Emerging forests on abandoned land: Puerto Rico’s new forests. For Ecol Manage 190:145–161 Mather A (1992) The forest transition. Area 24:367–379 Meadows J (2011) Urbanisation of rural lands: supporting forest management amongst the small-scale rural lifestyle landholders of the Noosa Hinterland, South-East Queensland. Dissertation, University of Queensland Meadows J, Herbohn J, Emtage N (2013) Supporting cooperative forest management among small-acreage lifestyle landowners in South-East Queensland, Australia. Soc Nat Res 26(7):745–761 Meadows J, Emtage N, Herbohn J (2014) Engaging Australian small-scale lifestyle landowners in natural resource management programs—perceptions, past experiences and policy implications. Land Use Policy 36(2014):618–627 Mendham E, Curtis A (2010) Taking over the reins: trends and impacts of changes in rural property ownership. Soc Nat Res 23(7):653–668 Meyfroidt P, Lambin E (2011) Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:343–371 Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, California Morris C (2010) Environmental knowledge and small-scale rural landholding in south-west England. Geogr J 176(1):77–89 Pannell D, Wilkinson R (2009) Policy mechanism choice for environmental management by non-commercial ‘lifestyle’ rural landholders. Ecol Econ 98:2679–2687 Parkes T, Delaney M, Dunphy M, Woodford R, Bower H, Bower S, Bailey D, Joseph R, Nagle J, Roberts T, Lymburner S (2012) Big scrub: a cleared landscape in transition back to forest? Ecol Manag Restor 13(3):212–223 Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Newbury Park Petrzelka P, Ma Z, Malin S (2013) The elephant in the room: absentee landowner issues in conservation and land management. Land Use Policy 30(2013):157–166 Rudel T, Perez-Lugo M, Zichal H (2000) When fields revert to forest: development and spontaneous reforestation in post-war Puerto Rico. Profes Geogr 52:386–397 Rudel T, Coomes O, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of the land use change. Glob Environ Change 15:23–31 Salt D, Lindenmayer D, Hobbs R (2004) Trees and Biodiversity: A Guide for Australian Farm Forestry. RIRDC Publication No. 03/047, Canberra SCC (Sunshine Coast Council) (2013) Sunshine coast rural futures strategy. SCC, Nambour SCRC (Sunshine Coast Regional Council) (2010) Our place our future—Sunshine Coast Biodiversity Strategy 2010–2020. SCRC, Nambour Senanayake R (2000) Analog forestry: an alternative to ‘clear and simplify’. ILEIA Newslett 2000:12–13 Sinclair I (2001) A view from the edge: rural residential development impact. New Plan 48:1 Vanclay J (2005) Using a typology of tree-growers to guide forestry extension. Ann Trop Res 27(1):97–104 Walker P, Marvin S, Fortmann L (2003) Landscape changes in Nevada County reflect social and ecological transitions. Calif Agric 57(4):115–121 Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks