Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta‐analysis

Journal of Ecology - Tập 100 Số 3 - Trang 742-749 - 2012
Yu Zhang1, Han Y. H. Chen1, Peter B. Reich2,3
1Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
2Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Ave. N., St. Paul, MN 55108-6112, USA
3Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

Tóm tắt

Summary1. Although there is ample support for positive species richness–productivity relationships in planted grassland experiments, a recent 48‐site study found no diversity–productivity relationship (DPR) in herbaceous communities. Thus, debate persists about diversity effects in natural versus planted systems. Additionally, current knowledge is weak regarding the influence of evenness on the DPRs, how DPRs are affected by the variation in life‐history traits among constituent species in polycultures and how DPRs differ among biomes. The impacts of these factors on DPRs in forest ecosystems are even more poorly understood.2. We performed a meta‐analysis of 54 studies to reconcile DPRs in forest ecosystems. We quantified the net diversity effect as log effect size [ln(ES)], the log ratio of the productivity in polycultures to the average of those in monocultures within the same type of mixture, site condition and stand age of each study. The first use of a boosted regression tree model in meta‐analysis, a useful method to partition the effects of multiple predictors rather than relying on vote‐counting of individual studies, unveiled the relative influences of individual predictors.3. Global average ln(ES) was 0.2128, indicating 23.7% higher productivity in polycultures than monocultures. The final model explained 21% of the variation in ln(ES). The predictors that substantially accounted for the explained variation included evenness (34%), heterogeneity of shade tolerance (29%), richness (13%) and stand age (15%). In contrast, heterogeneity of nitrogen fixation and growth habits, biome and stand origin (naturally established versus planted) contributed negligibly (each ≤ 4%). Log effect size strongly increased with evenness from 0.6 to 1 and with richness from 2 to 6. Furthermore, it was higher with heterogeneity of shade tolerance and generally increased with stand age.4.Synthesis.Our analysis is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate the critical role of species evenness, richness and the importance of contrasting traits in defining net diversity effects in forest polycultures. While testing the specific mechanisms is beyond the scope of our analysis, our results should motivate future studies to link richness, evenness, contrasting traits and life‐history stage to the mechanisms that are expected to produce positive net biodiversity effects such as niche differentiation, facilitation and reduced Janzen–Connell effects.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1126/science.1204498

10.1139/x06-042

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00583.x

10.1890/06-0654

10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01769.x

10.1371/journal.pone.0005695

10.1038/nature09904

10.1073/pnas.0709069104

10.1139/X09-171

10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19294.x

10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00148-8

10.1139/a02-007

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00689.x

Connell J.H., 1971, Dynamics of Numbers in Populations, 298

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01507.x

Darwin C., 1859, The Annotated Origin: A Facsimile of the First Edition of on the Origin of Species

10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2

10.1890/070195

10.1139/x01-029

10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x

10.1098/rspb.2006.0351

10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00575-8

10.1002/sim.1501

Garber S.M., 2004, Stand productivity and development in two mixed‐species spacing trials in the central Oregon cascades, Forest Science, 50, 92, 10.1093/forestscience/50.1.92

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01058.x

10.1890/06-2140.1

10.1126/science.1064815

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2

10.1890/07-1053.1

10.1890/09-0070.1

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01388.x

10.1890/04-0922

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01299.x

10.1038/nature10282

10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02371.x

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01225.x

10.1016/j.baae.2004.06.003

10.1016/j.baae.2008.06.001

10.1038/35083573

10.1126/science.1064088

10.5558/tfc77351-2

10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01476.x

10.1890/09-0069.1

10.1890/08-0877.1

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547951.003.0001

10.1139/x94-280

10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x

Pielou E.C., 1969, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology

10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00422.x

10.1007/s10342-008-0215-9

10.1086/374368

Ridgeway G.(2010)gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models: R Package Version 1.6‐3.1.http://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=gbm(accessed 25 December 2010).

10.1890/10-0773.1

10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.003

10.1073/pnas.0806425105

10.1007/s10531-007-9150-1

10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06455.x

10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1455:TECOCI]2.0.CO;2

10.1038/379718a0

10.1038/466036a

10.1007/s00442-003-1182-y

10.1126/science.1098778

10.1371/journal.pone.0002825

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00994.x