Forest pest management sociopolitics

Forest Ecology and Management - Tập 39 - Trang 289-297 - 1991
Donald L. Dahlsten1, Steve H. Dreistadt1
1Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A.

Tài liệu tham khảo

1982 1983, 3 Carson, 1962, Silent Spring, 368 Czerwinski, 1986, Urban pest management and social conflict in the control of gypsy moth in west coast cities, Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 32, 36 Davidson, 1979, An urban gypsy moth eradication program in 1979 Dreistadt, 1983, Gypsy moth in California: Is carbaryl the answer?, CBE Environ. Rev., 3 Dreistadt, 1986, Medfly eradication in California: Lessons from the field, Environment, 28, 18, 10.1080/00139157.1986.9929921 Dreistadt, 1986, Medfly eradication in California: Lessons from the field, Environment, 28, 40 Dreistadt, 1989, Gypsy moth eradication in Pacific Coast states: History and evaluation, Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am., 35, 13 Dunlap, 1980, The gypsy moth: a study in science and public policy, J. For. Hist., 24, 116 Forbush, 1896, The Gypsy Moth, 495 Hirsh, 1984, The case against carbaryl, CBE Environ. Rev., 3 Lorraine, 1984, The 1980 medfly crisis: An analysis of uncertainty management under conditions of non-routine problem solving, 407 Metcalf, 1980, Changing role of insecticides in crop protection, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 22, 219, 10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.001251 Perkins, 1982, Insects, Experts, and the Insecticide Crisis, 304 Popham, 1958, Insect eradication programs, Annu. Rev. Entomol., 3, 334, 10.1146/annurev.en.03.010158.002003 Puritch, 1981, Effects of insecticidal soap in the gypsy moth program in Kitsilano on insects and vegetation, 23