Forest management after the economic transition—at the crossroads between German and Scandinavian traditions

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 11 Số 8 - Trang 586-592 - 2009
Vilis Brukas1, Norbert Weber2
1The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, P.O. Box 49, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden
2Professur fuer Forstpolitik und Forstliche Ressourcenoekonomie, der Technischen Universitaet Dresden, Pienner Str. 8, D-01737 Tharandt, Germany

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alternativ 2008. Kontinuitetsskogsbruk för självverksamma. [Continuos cover forestry for the self-employed.] Debate on internet discussion forum alternativ.nu (Accessed on December 2, 2008).

Baumgarten, 2005, Nachhaltige Waldwirtschaft in Deutschland, 1

BELV 2007. Bundeswaldinventur2. Alle Berichte. Hyperlink: http://www.bundeswaldinventur.de (accessed on November 6, 2007).

BELV (Bundesministerium fuer Ernaehrung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz) 2004. Die zweite Bundeswaldinventur—BWI. Das wichtigste in Kuerze.

Boman, 2008, On the budget for national environmental objectives and willingness to pay for protection of forest land, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38, 40, 10.1139/X07-129

Bormann, K., 2004. Finanziell optimale Waldpflegeregime in der Baumart Kiefer. Diplom-thesis Tharandt, Technische Universität Dresden.

Bormann, 2005, Zur ökonomischen Situation von Forstbetrieben in Deutschland

Brukas, V., 2000. Integrating environmental and socio-economic values into Lithuanian forestry. PhD thesis, KVL, Copenhagen.

Brukas, 2001, Discount rate and harvest policy: implications for Baltic forestry, Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 143, 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8

CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) 2007. The world factbook 2007. Hyperlink: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ (accessed on August 9, 2007).

Ciancio, 2000, Forest management from positivism to the culture of complexity, 47

Ekö, 2006, Comparison of the economic potential of spruce and birch, 12

Enander, K.G. 2007. Skogsbruk på samhälles villkor. Skogsskötsel och skogspolitik under 150 år. [Forestry under society's conditions. Forest management and policy during 150years]. SLU, Umeå.

Faustmann, 1849, Berechnung des Werthes, welchen Waldboden, sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirtschaft besitzen, Allgemeine Forst-und Jagd-Zeitung, 441

Hanewinkel, 2005, Finanzielle Konsequenzen des Waldumbaus—Analyse mit Methoden der Investitionsrechnung, 248

Hofmann, 2000

Jasinevicius, G., 2008. Economic analysis of normative versus practical management of coniferous stands in Lithuania. MSc thesis, SLU, Alnarp, Sweden.

Klemperer, 1996

Klose, F., 1985. A brief history of the German forest—achievements and mistakes down to the ages. What lessons can be learned for forestry in developing countries? edited by GTZ.

Krott, 2005

Lazdinis, 2005, Innovative use of forest policy instruments in countries with economies in transition: experience of the Baltic States, Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 527, 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.001

Leonhardt, 2006, Gemeinwohl als Verpflichtung für den Staatswald, 199

Linkevicius, E., 2007. Policy drivers behind the forest utilisation in Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. MSc thesis, SLU, Alnarp, Sweden.

LVM (Latvijas Valsts Mezi) 2007. Annual report 2006. Hyperlink: www.lvm.lv/files/text/LVM_GP_2oo6_gb.pdf (accessed on November 16, 2007).

Maciejewski, 2002, The Baltic Sea region

MCPFE (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe). 2007. State of Europe's forests 2007. MCPFE Liaison Unit Warsaw; UNECE; FAO.

Mikusinski, 1998, Economic geography, forest distribution, and woodpecker diversity in central Europe, Conservation Biology, 12, 200, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96310.x

Miles, 1994

Mohring, 2001, The German struggle between the ‘Bodenreinertragslehre’ (land rent theory) and ‘Waldreinertragslehre’ (theory of the highest revenue) belongs to the past—but what is left?, Forest Policy and Economics, 2, 195, 10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00049-1

Morkevicius, 2007, What awaits the Lithuanian forest sector?, Baltijos Miskai ir Mediena, 7, 12

Patton, 2001

Rametsteiner, 1999, The attitude of European consumers towards forests and forestry, Unasylva, 50, 42

Redko, 2002

Sallnäs, 2006, Choice of tree species—how do we handle the risk of storm damage?, 30

Schanz, 1999, Social Changes and Forestry, 59

Schmidt, 2002, Der Wald in Deutschland im 18. und 19

State Forest Service, 2006

Weber, 2000, Forstpolitische Aktivitäten von Umweltverbänden in Deutschland–eine vorläufige Bestandsaufnahme, Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 171, 144

Wypij, K. 2008. Analysis of the drivers behind the forest utilization in Poland. Comparison of selected strategic issues in Poland, Latvia and Lithuania. MSc thesis, SLU, Alnarp, Sweden.