Forest certification: the challenge of measuring impacts
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bullock, 2017
FSC, 2014
2011
Gunningham, 2004, Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance, Law Soc Inq, 29, 307, 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x
Hoang, 2015, Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications, J For Res, 20, 35, 10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
Kollert, 2007, Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium?, For Policy Econ, 9, 862, 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.005
Kalfagianni, 2015, Private agri-food governance and the challenges for sustainability, 274
Kalfagianni, 2013, Fishing in muddy waters: exploring the conditions for effective governance of fisheries and aquaculture, Mar Policy, 38, 124, 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.028
Bernstein, 2017, Best practices in global governance, Rev Int Stud, 43, 534, 10.1017/S0260210516000425
Derkx, 2014, Elaborating global private meta-governance: an inventory in the realm of voluntary sustainability standards, Glob Environ Change, 27, 41, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.016
Bartley, 2003, Certifying forests and factories: states, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields, Polit Soc, 31, 433, 10.1177/0032329203254863
O’Rourke, 2005, Market movements: nongovernmental organization strategies to influence global production and consumption, J Ind Ecol, 9, 115, 10.1162/1088198054084608
Cashore, 2004
Meidinger, 2006, The administrative law of global private-public regulation: the case of forestry, Eur J Int Law, 17, 47, 10.1093/ejil/chi168
Gereffi, 2014, Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world, Rev Int Polit Econ, 21, 9, 10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
Greenpeace, 2017, Blood-stained timber: rural violence and the theft of Amazon timber
Godbout, 2018, Genomic tools for traceability: Opportunities, challenges and perspectives for the Canadian forestry sector, For Chron, 94, 75, 10.5558/tfc2018-010
Cashore, 2012, Can legality verification rescue global forest governance?: Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia, For Policy Econ, 18, 13, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.005
Cashore, 2014, Does California need Delaware? Explaining Indonesian, Chinese, and United States support for legality compliance of internationally traded products, Regul Gov, 8, 49, 10.1111/rego.12053
Overdevest, 2018, Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: implementing European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements in Indonesia and Ghana, Regul Gov, 12, 64, 10.1111/rego.12180
Pacheco, 2017, Zero deforestation and low emissions development: public and private institutional arrangements under jurisdictional approaches, Cent Int For Res, 1
Dauvergne, 2001
Bernstein, 2004, Non-state global governance: is forest certification a legitimate alternative to a global forest convention?
Tollefson, 2009
FSC, 2017
Gulbrandsen, 2014, Dynamic governance interactions: evolutionary effects of state responses to Non-State certification programs, Regul Gov, 8, 74, 10.1111/rego.12005
Cashore, 2012, Appendix F: forestry review
Humphreys, 2006
Clark, 2011, Comparing sustainable forest management certifications standards: a meta-analysis, Ecol Soc, 16, 10.5751/ES-03736-160103
Cadman, 2011
Auld, 2014
PEFC, 2017
FSC, 2017
FSC, 2017
Fransen, 2011, Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political–institutional analysis of transnational labor standards regulation, Governance, 24, 359, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01519.x
Fransen, 2012, A market for worker rights: explaining business support for international private labour regulation, Rev Int Polit Econ, 19, 236, 10.1080/09692290.2011.552788
Gulbrandsen, 2005, Sustainable forestry in Sweden: the effect of competition among private certification schemes, J Environ Dev, 14, 338, 10.1177/1070496505280061
Overdevest, 2010, Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector, Socio-Econ Rev, 8, 47, 10.1093/ser/mwp028
Smith, 2010, Rival private governance networks: competing to define the rules of sustainability performance, Glob Environ Change, 20, 511, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.006
van der Ven, 2015, Correlates of rigorous and credible transnational governance: a cross-sectoral analysis of best practice compliance in eco-labeling, Regul Gov, 9, 276, 10.1111/rego.12092
Romero, 2017, Evaluation of the impacts of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certification of natural forest management in the tropics: a rigorous approach to assessment of a complex conservation intervention, Int For Rev, 19, 1
Nordén, 2016, Evaluation of the impact of forest certification on environmental outcomes in Sweden, Work Pap Econ, 657
Blackman, 2010
Kraxner, 2017, Mapping certified forests for sustainable management—a global tool for information improvement through participatory and collaborative mapping, For Policy Econ, 83, 10, 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.014
Visseren-Hamakers, 2013, We can’t see the forest for the trees: the environmental impact of global forest certification is unknown, Gaia, 22, 25, 10.14512/gaia.22.1.8
Milder, 2015, An agenda for assessing and improving conservation impacts of sustainability standards in tropical agriculture, Conserv Biol, 29, 309, 10.1111/cobi.12411
Karmann, 2009
van der Ven, 2018, Does eco-labeling prevent deforestation? Lessons from non-state market driven governance in the soy, palm oil, and cocoa sectors, Glob Environ Change, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.002
Blackman, 2018, Does eco-certification stem tropical deforestation? Forest Stewardship Council certification in Mexico, J Environ Econ Manag, 89, 306, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.04.005
Klooster, 2010, The local instrumentality of global standards: how Mexican indigenous communities use FSC certification to foster a furniture production network
Meek, 2001
Cerutti, 2016, Social impacts of the Forest Stewardship Council certification in the Congo Basin, Int For Rev, 18, 1
Carlson, 2016, A qualitative meta-synthesis of the benefits of eco-labeling in developing countries, Ecol Econ, 127, 129, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.020
DeFries, 2017, Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence, Environ Res Lett, 12, 033001, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa625e
Auld, 2008, Certification schemes and the impacts on forests and forestry, Annu Rev Environ Resour, 33, 187, 10.1146/annurev.environ.33.013007.103754
Newsom, 2006, Does forest certification matter? An analysis of operation-level changes required during the SmartWood certification process in the United States, For Policy Econ, 9, 197, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.06.007
Hirschberger, 2005
Blackman, 2017, Does forest certification in developing countries have environmental benefits? Insights from Mexican corrective action requests, Int For Rev, 19, 247
Heilmayr, 2016, Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113, 2910, 10.1073/pnas.1600394113
Kalonga, 2015, Does forest certification enhance forest structure? Empirical evidence from certified community-based forest management in Kilwa District, Tanzania, Int For Rev, 17, 182
Miteva, 2015, Social and environmental impacts of forest management certification in Indonesia, PLOS ONE, 10, e0129675, 10.1371/journal.pone.0129675
le Polain de Waroux, 2017, The restructuring of South American soy and beef production and trade under changing environmental regulations, World Dev
Lambin, 2018, The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation, Nat Clim Change, 8, 109, 10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1
Savilaakso, 2017, Timber certification as a catalyst for change in forest governance in Cameroon, Indonesia, and Peru, Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag, 13, 116, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1269134
Snilsveit, 2016
van der Ven, 2016, Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance, Glob Environ Polit, 17, 1, 10.1162/GLEP_a_00387