Forest certification and trust — Different roles in different environments

Appelstrand, 2002, Participation and societal values: the challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners, Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 281, 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00070-9

Bernstein, 2004, Nonstate global governance: is forest certification a legitimate alternative to a global forest convention?, 32

Boström, 2008

Braithwaite, 2004, Conclusion, 269

Buchanan, 2006, The legitimacy of global governance institutions, Ethics & International Affairs, 20, 405, 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x

Cashore, 2007, Revising theories of nonstate market-driven (NSMD) governance: lessons from the Finnish forest certification experience, Global Environmental Politics, 7, 1, 10.1162/glep.2007.7.1.1

Donner-Amnell, 2010, Metsäsektorinlegitimiteettimurroksessa, 219

FAO/ECE/ILO Committee on forest technology, management and training, 2002, Public participation in forestry in Europe and North America

Fell, 1999, On the establishment of trust in the Russian forest sector

Fromond, 2009, Regulatory innovations for biodiversity protection in private forests — towards flexibility, Journal of Environmental Law, 21, 1, 10.1093/jel/eqn033

FSC, 2012

FSC Standard Finland

FSC Standard Finland

FSC Standard Russia

Fukuyama, 1995

Giddens, 1994, Living in a post-traditional society, 56

Interviews, 2008. See the list of interviews below.

Karppinen, 1998, Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland, Silva Fennica, 32, 43, 10.14214/sf.699

Karppinen, 2010, “Semmonen niinkun metsäkansa” — suurten ikäluokkien perijät tulevaisuuden metsänomistajina, Metsätieteen aikakauskirja, 1, 19

Keskitalo, 2009, Local consequences of applying international norms: differences in the application of forest certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland, and Northwest Russia, Ecology and Society, 14, 2, 10.5751/ES-02893-140201

Kokko, 2009, A legal method and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of regulation: safeguarding forest biodiversity in Finland, Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 57

Kortelainen, 2009, Construction of trust in Russian mill towns, 149

Kulyasov, 2010, Building trust in the process of localization of global forest certification, no. 65, 110

Kulyasov, 2010, Konstruirovanie doveriya pri lokalizatsii globalnogo protsessa lesnoy sertifikatsii: rol NPO i ekspertov, XIII, 283

Kulyasova, 2008, Rol NPO v stimulirovaniikorporativnoysotsialno-ekologicheskoiotvetstvennost i naprimere lesnogo kholdinga PLO Onegales, no. 202, 126

Kulyasova, 2013, Trust as a strategy of interaction: Three logging companies in one district, Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 27, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.008

Lee, 2003, The usual suspects? Public participation under the Aarhus convention, The Modern Law Review, 66, 80, 10.1111/1468-2230.6601004

Leskinen, 2004, Purposes and challenges of public participation in regional and local forestry in Finland, Forest Policy and Economics, 6, 605, 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00009-1

Matilainen, 2009, The struggle for the ownership of pulp and paper mills, 105

Mayer, 1995, An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335

McDermott, 2012, Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: a case study of the FSC in British Columbia, Geoforum, 43, 634, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.002

Mönkkönen, 2006, Uudetkeinot, 86

Nysten-Haarala, 2013, Creating trust in institutions in Russian forest localities, Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 11

Offe, 1999, How can we trust our fellow citizens?, 42

Pappila, 2009, Muuttuva metsäsääntely Luoteis-Venäjällä, Ympäristöjuridiikka, 3, 28

Pappila, 2012, Reconsidering the role of public participation in the Finnish forest planning system, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 177, 10.1080/02827581.2011.635084

Parviainen, 2007

PEFC

PEFC Standard Finland

PEFC Standard Russia

Primmer, 2006, Yhteistoimintaverkostot Etelä-Suomen metsien monimuotoisuusohjelman kokeiluhanke, 45

Ptichnikov, 2005, Strengthening Russia's engagement with market-based corporate social responsibility (CSR)

Raitio, 2008, “You can't please everyone” – conflict management practices, frames and institutions in Finnish state forests

Rämö, 2009, Uusien metsänomistajien asenteet, motiivit ja aikomukset metsiin ja metsänomistukseen liittyvissä asioissa

Similä, 2009, Oikeudellinen sääntely ja metsäluonnon monimuotoisuus, III, 69

Temisevä, 2008, Maisema — ja virkistysarvokauppa: Eri maiden kokemuksia ja lähtökohtia suomalaisen käytännön kehittämiselle, 81

Teplyakov, 2006

Tikkanen, J., 2006. Osapuolten välinen yhteistyö yksityismetsien suunnittelussa. Metsäsuunnittelu ja ekonomia, Metsätieteellinen tiedekunta. University of Joensuu. Dissertationes Forestales 26.

Tulayeva, 2008, Vnedenie negosudarsvennyh institutov regulirovanija v Rossiiskii lesnoi biznes pod vlijaniem globalnyh praktik (na primere lesnoi sertifikatsii na Cegezhskom ZBK), no. 202, 104

Tysiachniouk, 2006, Forest certification in Russia, 261

Tysiachniouk, 2009, Conflict as a form of governance: the market campaign to save the Karelian forests, 169

Tysiachniouk, 2013, Fostering transparency in the transnational supply chain: From Russian forest producers to consumers in Europe and USA, Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 2, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.02.011

Tysiachniouk, 2006, Using forest certification to strengthening rural communities: cases from northwest Russia

Uslaner, 1999, Democracy and social capital, 121

Valkeapää, 2009, Suomen metsät ja metsäpolitiikka — kansalaisten näkemyksiä

Valtioneuvostonoikeuskansleri, 2003

Viitala, 2003

Warren, 1999, Democratic theory and trust, 310

World Economic Forum

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008

2008