Forensics and Mitochondrial DNA: Applications, Debates, and Foundations

Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics - Tập 4 Số 1 - Trang 119-141 - 2003
Bruce Budowle1,2,3,4, Marc W. Allard1,2,3,4, Mark R. Wilson1,2,3,4,5, Ranajit Chakraborty1,2,6,3,4
1Biology Department of Biological Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052;
2Center for Genome Information, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45267;
3Laboratory Division, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia 22135;
4Laboratory Division, FBI, Washington, DC 20535;
5[Federal Bureau of Investigation]
6Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences

Tóm tắt

Debate on the validity and reliability of scientific methods often arises in the courtroom. When the government (i.e., the prosecution) is the proponent of evidence, the defense is obliged to challenge its admissibility. Regardless, those who seek to use DNA typing methodologies to analyze forensic biological evidence have a responsibility to understand the technology and its applications so a proper foundation(s) for its use can be laid. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), an extranuclear genome, has certain features that make it desirable for forensics, namely, high copy number, lack of recombination, and matrilineal inheritance. mtDNA typing has become routine in forensic biology and is used to analyze old bones, teeth, hair shafts, and other biological samples where nuclear DNA content is low. To evaluate results obtained by sequencing the two hypervariable regions of the control region of the human mtDNA genome, one must consider the genetically related issues of nomenclature, reference population databases, heteroplasmy, paternal leakage, recombination, and, of course, interpretation of results. We describe the approaches, the impact some issues may have on interpretation of mtDNA analyses, and some issues raised in the courtroom.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1520/JFS15553J

Allard MW, 2003, Forensic Sci. Int.

10.1520/JFS16169J

10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00602-8

10.1086/303004

10.1038/13779

10.1038/290457a0

Arctander P, 1999, Science, 284, 2090, 10.1126/science.284.5423.2089e

10.1126/science.286.5449.2524

10.1126/science.288.5473.1931a

10.1007/s004140000149

10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02151-6

10.1086/301636

Bendall KE, 1995, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 57, 248

10.1046/j.1469-1809.2001.6560549.x

Bogenhagen D, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 7791, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42063-2

10.1520/JFS13786J

10.1007/BF01734101

Budowle B, 1990, Mitochondrial DNA: a possible genetic material suitable for forensic analysis.

10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00019-1

10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00274-8

Budowle B, 1990, Appl. Theor. Electrophoresis, 1, 181

Budowle B, 1991, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 48, 137

Budowle B, DiZinno JA, Wilson MR. 1999. Interpretation guidelines for mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Presented at Int. Symp. Hum. Identif., 10th, Madison, Wis.

10.1520/JFS13758J

10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00042-0

10.1038/325031a0

10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00161-4

10.1007/BF01544751

Chakraborty R, Jin L, Deka R, Kimmel M, Budowle B. 2001. Signatures of recurrent mutations at single nucleotide polymorphism sites in the hypervariable domains of the mitochondrial control region and their implications for evolutionary studies. Presented at Am. Assoc. Phys. Anthropol., St. Louis, Mo.

10.1086/302848

10.1101/gr.5.1.89

10.1520/JFS13188J

10.1017/S0967199400003889

10.1017/S0967199498000148

Daoudi Y, Morgan M, Diefenbach C, Ryan J, Johnson T, et al. 1998. Identification of the Vietnam tomb of the unknown soldier, the many roles of mitochondrial DNA. Presented at Int. Symp. Huml Identif., 9th, Madison, Wis.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)

10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00275-X

D'Eustachio P. 2000. People v. Edmund Ko, Indictment No. 2449/98, New York County, May 10, pp. 528–31

Edwards A, 1991, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 49, 746

10.1098/rspb.1999.0662

10.1098/rspb.1999.0884

10.1086/320591

10.1093/nar/16.13.5841

10.1007/s100380170098

10.1073/pnas.77.11.6715

10.1038/ng0294-130

10.1038/318577a0

10.1038/ng1092-135

Goloboff P. 1994. NONA: a tree search program. ftp.unt.edu.ar/pub/parsimonyandwww.cladistics.org

10.1016/0378-1119(83)90145-2

10.1038/352255a0

10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(20000201)21:3<548::AID-ELPS548>3.0.CO;2-U

Grzybowski T, 2000, Electrophoresis

10.1098/rspb.1999.0663

10.1098/rspb.2000.1183

Hall BG, 2001, Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy: A How-To Manual For Molecular Biologists.

Hanni C, 1990, C. R. Acad. Sci. III, 310, 365

10.1086/318785

Hillis DM, 1996, Molecular Systematics.

10.1520/JFS13439J

Holland MM, 1999, Forensic Sci. Rev., 11, 21

Hopgood R, 1992, Biotechniques, 13, 82

Horai S, 1996, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59, 579

10.1038/251536a0

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004170

10.1038/ng0496-417

10.1038/314067a0

10.1038/316076a0

10.1126/science.288.5473.1931a

10.1520/JFS12944J

Kimmel M, Bobrowski A, Wang N, Budowle B, Chakraborty R. 2001. Non-homogeneous infinite sites model under demographic changes of population size: application to mitochondrial DNA data. Presented at Am. Assoc. Phys. Anthropol., St. Louis, Mo.

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003996

10.1126/science.288.5473.1931a

10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80310-4

10.1126/science.288.5473.1931a

10.1520/JFS14367J

10.1007/BF01225519

Kurosaki K, 1993, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 53, 638

10.1086/302204

10.1098/rspb.1999.0883

10.1520/JFS14909J

Melton T, 1997, J. Forensic Sci., 42, 582

10.1520/JFS13960J

10.1073/pnas.82.9.2895

10.1016/0378-1119(86)90208-8

Monson K, 2002, Forensic Sci. Com.

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003971

Natl. Res. Counc. II Rep., 1996, The Evaluation of Forensic Evidence.

10.1353/hub.2001.0023

10.1086/302197

10.1002/ajpa.1330980204

10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939

10.1093/nar/16.20.9775

Pääbo S, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 9707, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)81710-0

Page RDM, 1998, Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach.

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199604)99:4<507::AID-AJPA1>3.0.CO;2-R

10.1046/j.1469-1809.2001.6550439.x

10.1007/s004140050251

10.1046/j.1469-1809.1998.6260531.x

10.1073/pnas.86.16.6230

10.1007/s004140050257

10.1056/NEJMoa020350

Shitara H, 1998, Genetics, 148, 851, 10.1093/genetics/148.2.851

Shitara H, 2000, Genetics, 156, 1277, 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1277

10.1520/JFS15059J

Stoneking M, 1991, Am. J. Hum. Gen., 48, 370

10.1126/science.286.5449.2436a

10.1002/elps.1150120105

10.1007/BF02340829

10.1074/jbc.271.44.27536

Torroni A, 1996, Genetics, 114, 1835, 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1835

10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00573-4

Tully G, 2001, Electrophoresis, 22, 180

10.1086/302996

10.1073/pnas.86.23.9350

10.1126/science.1840702

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026422

10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00206-2

10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00206-2

10.1007/BF01369907

Wilson MR, 1995, Biotechniques, 18, 662

Wilson MR, 1997, Nat. Genet., 100, 167

10.1073/pnas.77.11.6754