Forage use and niche partitioning by non-native bumblebees in New Zealand: implications for the conservation of their populations of origin

Journal of Insect Conservation - Tập 14 - Trang 607-615 - 2010
G. C. Lye1, J. C. Kaden1, K. J. Park1, D. Goulson1
1School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

Tóm tắt

Bumblebees were introduced into New Zealand from the UK approximately 120 years ago and four species became established. Two of these, Bombus terrestris and B. hortorum, are common in Europe whilst two, B. ruderatus and B. subterraneus, have experienced declines, and the latter is now extinct in the UK. The presence of these species in New Zealand presents an opportunity to study their ecology in a contrasting environment. Forage visits made by bumblebees in New Zealand were recorded across a season. Ninety-six percent of visits were to six non-native forage plants (Cirsium vulgare, Echium vulgare, Hypericum perforatum, Lotus corniculatus, Lupinus polyphyllus and Trifolium pratense). All but L. polyphyllus are European plant species, and three are noxious weeds in New Zealand. Several of these plants have decreased in abundance in the UK, providing a potential explanation for the declines of B. ruderatus and B. subterraneus in Britain. In contrast to studies conducted elsewhere, B. ruderatus, B. terrestris and B. hortorum did not differ in diet breadth and overlap in forage use was high, probably due to the reduced diversity of bumblebee forage plants present in New Zealand. Diel partitioning of forage use between the species was observed, with foraging activity of B. hortorum greatest in the morning and evening, B. ruderatus greatest in the middle of the day and B. terrestris intermediate between the two. These patterns correspond to the climatic preferences of each species as evidenced by their geographic ranges. Implications for bumblebee conservation in the UK are discussed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barthell JF, Randall JM, Thorp RW, Wenner AM (2001) Promotion of seed set in yellow star-thistle by honey bees: evidence of an invasive mutualism. Ecol Appl 11:1870–1883 Carvell C, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Nowakowski M (2004) The response of bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field margins. Biol Conserv 118:327–339 Carvell C, Roy DB, Smart SM, Pywell RF, Preston CD, Goulson D (2006a) Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biol Conserv 132:481–489 Carvell C, Westrich P, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Nowakowski M (2006b) Assessing the value of annual and perennial forage mixtures for bumblebees by direct observation and pollen analysis. Apidologie 37:326–340 Carvell C, Meek WR, Pywell RF, Goulson D, Nowakowski M (2007) Comparing the efficiency of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins. J Appl Ecol 44:29–40 Colwell RK, Futuyma DJ (1971) On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecol 52:567–576 Donovan BJ (1980) Interactions between native and introduced bees in New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 3:104–116 Donovan BJ, Weir SS (1978) Development of hives for field population increase, and studies on the life cycle of the four species of introduced bumble bees in New Zealand. NZ J Agric Res 21:733–756 Edwards M, Jenner M (2005) Field guide to the bumblebees of Great Britain and Ireland. Ocelli, UK Fussell M, Corbet SA (1992) The nesting places of some British bumble bees. J Apic Res 31:32–41 Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:1–26 Goulson D (2009) Short-haired bumblebee reintroduction project storms ahead!. Buzzword: Newslett Bumblebee Conserv Trust 11:8–9 Goulson D, Darvill B (2004) Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees. Are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers? Apidologie 35:55–64 Goulson D, Derwent LC (2004) Synergistic interactions between an exotic honeybee and an exotic weed: pollination of Lantana camara in Australia. Weed Res 44:195–202 Goulson D, Hanley ME (2004) Distribution and forage use of exotic bumblebees in South Island, New Zealand. NZ J Ecol 28:225–232 Goulson D, Stout JC, Kells AR (2002) Do alien bumblebees compete with native flower-visiting insects in Tasmania? J Insect Conserv 6:179–189 Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis JS, Knight ME (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol Conserv 122:1–8 Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008a) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol 53:191–208 Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008b) Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees. Biodivers Conserv 17:3269–3288 Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (1988) Comparative plant ecology. Unwin Hyman, London Hanley ME, Goulson D (2003) Introduced weeds pollinated by introduced bees: cause or effect? Weed Biol Manag 3:204–212 Hanley ME, Franco M, Pichon S, Darvill B, Goulson D (2008) Breeding system, pollinator choice and variation in pollen quality in British herbaceous plants. Funct Ecol 22:592–598 Harder LD (1985) Morphology as a predictor of flower choice by bumblebees. Ecol 66:198–210 Hasselrot TB (1960) Studies on Swedish bumble bees (genus Bombus Latr.); their domestication and biology. Opusc Entomol Suppl 17:1–192 Hingston AB, McQuillan PB (1998) Does the recently introduced bumblebee Bombus terrestris (Apidae) threaten Australian ecosystems? Aust J Ecol 23:539–549 Hopkins I (1914) History of the bumblebee in New Zealand: its introduction and results. NZ Dep Agric Ind Commer 46:1–29 Inouye DW (1978) Resource partitioning in bumblebees: experimental studies of foraging behaviour. Ecol 59:672–678 MacFarlane RP (1976) Bees and pollination. In: Ferro DN (ed) New Zealand insect pests. Lincoln University College of Agriculture, New Zealand, pp 221–229 MacFarlane RP, Gurr L (1995) Distribution of bumble bees in New Zealand. NZ Entomol 18:29–36 Matsumara C, Nakajima M, Yokoyama J, Waishitini I (2004) High reproductive ability of an alien bumblebee invader, Bombus terrestris, L., in the Hidaka region of southern Hokkaido, Japan. Jpn J Conserv Ecol 9:93–102 Pyke GH (1982) Local geographic distributions of bumblebees near Crested Butte, Colorado: competition and community structure. Ecol 63:555–573 Ranta E, Lundberg H (1980) Resource partitioning in bumblebees: the significance of differences in proboscis length. Oikos 35:298–302 Rich TCG, Woodruff ER (1996) Changes in the vascular plant floras of England and Scotland between 1930–1960 and 1987–1988: The BSBI monitoring scheme. Biol Conserv 75:217–229 Semmens TD, Turner E, Buttermore R (1993) Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) now established in Tasmania. J Aust Entomol Soc 32:346 Simpson GH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nat 163:688 Sladen FWL (1912) The humble-bee, its life history and how to domesticate it. Macmillan, UK Stout JC, Kells AR, Goulson D (2002) Pollination of the invasive exotic shrub Lupinus arboreus (Fabaceae) by introduced bees in Tasmania. Biol Conserv 106:425–434 Thomson DM (2006) Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecol 85:458–470 Weiner CN, Hilpert A, Werner M, Linsenmair KE, Blüthgen N (2010) Pollen amino acids and flower specialisation in solitary bees. Apidologie (in press). doi:10.1051/apido/2009083 Williams PH (1986) Environmental change and the distribution of British bumblebees (Bombus Latr.). Bee world 67:50–61 Williams PH (2005) Does specialization explain rarity and decline among British bumblebees? A response to Goulson et al. Biol Conserv 122:33–43