For or against structural realism? A verdict from high energy physics
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics - Tập 49 - Trang 84-101 - 2015
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ainsworth, 2010, What is ontic structural realism?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 50, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.11.001
Brading, 2011, Structuralist approaches to physics: objects, models and modality
Brading, 2003, Which symmetry? Noether, Weyl and conservation of electric charge, History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 3, 10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00033-8
Brading, 2002, Symmetries and Noether׳s theorems, 89
Brading, 2006, Scientific structuralism: Presentation and representation, Philosophy of Science, 73, 571, 10.1086/518327
Brading, K. & Skiles, A. (2012). Underdetermination as a path to ontic structural realism. In E. Landry & D. Rickles (Eds.), Structure, object, and causality: proceedings of the Banff workshop on structural realism (pp. 99–116). University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Springer.
Brown, 1994
Castellani, 1998
Chakravartty, 2003, The structuralist conception of objects, Philosophy of Science, 70, 867, 10.1086/377373
Chakravartty, 2012, Ontological priority: The conceptual basis of non-eliminative, ontic structural realism
French, 2009, Metaphysical underdetermination: Why worry?, Synthese, 180, 205, 10.1007/s11229-009-9598-5
French, 2003, Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure, Synthese, 136, 31, 10.1023/A:1024156116636
Gell-Mann, 1994
Healey, 2007
Kantorovich, 2003, The priority of internal symmetries in particle physics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 651, 10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00067-4
Ladyman, J. (2009). In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), “Structural Realism”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2009 edition). URL: 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/structural-realism/〉.
Ladyman, 2007
Lyre, 2004, Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, 643, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.07.004
Martin, 2002, Gauge principles, gauge argument and the logic of nature, Philosophy of Science, 69, S221, 10.1086/341848
McKenzie, 2012, Priority and particle physics: Ontic structural realism as a fundamentality thesis, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 0, 1
1999
Morrison, 1999, Models as autonomous agents, 38
Nounou, A. (2012). Varieties of properties and kinds of objects. In E. Landry, D. Rickles (Eds.), Structure, object, and causality: Proceedings of the Banff workshop on structural realism (pp. 117–134). University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Springer.
Nounou, 2010, Holonomy Interpretation and Time: an Incompatible Match?, Erkenntnis, 72, 387, 10.1007/s10670-010-9212-8
Pooley, 2006, Points, particles and structural realism, 83
Psillos, 2011, Living with the abstract: Realism and models, Synthese, 180, 3, 10.1007/s11229-009-9563-3
Roberts, 2011, Group structural realism, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 62, 47, 10.1093/bjps/axq009
Shapiro, 1997
Shaprio, 2000
Ray, 2014, Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature, 505, 657, 10.1038/nature12954
2005
Teller, 2000, The gauge argument, Philosophy of Science, 67, S466, 10.1086/392839
Weinberg, 2005, The making of the standard model
Wigner, 1939, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, The Annals of Mathematics, 40, 149, 10.2307/1968551