For or against structural realism? A verdict from high energy physics

Antigone M. Nounou1
1Department of Philosophy and History of Science, University of Athens, Greece

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ainsworth, 2010, What is ontic structural realism?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 50, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.11.001 Brading, 2011, Structuralist approaches to physics: objects, models and modality Brading, 2003, Which symmetry? Noether, Weyl and conservation of electric charge, History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 3, 10.1016/S1355-2198(01)00033-8 Brading, 2002, Symmetries and Noether׳s theorems, 89 Brading, 2006, Scientific structuralism: Presentation and representation, Philosophy of Science, 73, 571, 10.1086/518327 Brading, K. & Skiles, A. (2012). Underdetermination as a path to ontic structural realism. In E. Landry & D. Rickles (Eds.), Structure, object, and causality: proceedings of the Banff workshop on structural realism (pp. 99–116). University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Springer. Brown, 1994 Castellani, 1998 Chakravartty, 2003, The structuralist conception of objects, Philosophy of Science, 70, 867, 10.1086/377373 Chakravartty, 2012, Ontological priority: The conceptual basis of non-eliminative, ontic structural realism French, 2009, Metaphysical underdetermination: Why worry?, Synthese, 180, 205, 10.1007/s11229-009-9598-5 French, 2003, Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure, Synthese, 136, 31, 10.1023/A:1024156116636 Gell-Mann, 1994 Healey, 2007 Kantorovich, 2003, The priority of internal symmetries in particle physics, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, 651, 10.1016/S1355-2198(03)00067-4 Ladyman, J. (2009). In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), “Structural Realism”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2009 edition). URL: 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/structural-realism/〉. Ladyman, 2007 Lyre, 2004, Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35, 643, 10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.07.004 Martin, 2002, Gauge principles, gauge argument and the logic of nature, Philosophy of Science, 69, S221, 10.1086/341848 McKenzie, 2012, Priority and particle physics: Ontic structural realism as a fundamentality thesis, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 0, 1 1999 Morrison, 1999, Models as autonomous agents, 38 Nounou, A. (2012). Varieties of properties and kinds of objects. In E. Landry, D. Rickles (Eds.), Structure, object, and causality: Proceedings of the Banff workshop on structural realism (pp. 117–134). University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Springer. Nounou, 2010, Holonomy Interpretation and Time: an Incompatible Match?, Erkenntnis, 72, 387, 10.1007/s10670-010-9212-8 Pooley, 2006, Points, particles and structural realism, 83 Psillos, 2011, Living with the abstract: Realism and models, Synthese, 180, 3, 10.1007/s11229-009-9563-3 Roberts, 2011, Group structural realism, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 62, 47, 10.1093/bjps/axq009 Shapiro, 1997 Shaprio, 2000 Ray, 2014, Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature, 505, 657, 10.1038/nature12954 2005 Teller, 2000, The gauge argument, Philosophy of Science, 67, S466, 10.1086/392839 Weinberg, 2005, The making of the standard model Wigner, 1939, On unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group, The Annals of Mathematics, 40, 149, 10.2307/1968551