Follow-up descriptive study of how proportioning marks between coursework and examination affects the performance of students in nursing
Tóm tắt
There has been little attention to how the allocation of marks affects the academic performance of students in courses. Our previous study showed that students in nursing had much lower marks in exams than coursework (tutorials and case study) in a pharmacology course. It is not known whether this applies to nursing students in other courses and/or with different types of coursework. The purpose of this study was to analyse how the allocation of marks to examination and different coursework affected the performance of students in nursing in a bioscience course. For the 379 completing students in a nursing degree undertaking a first-year first semester bioscience course, a descriptive study was undertaken of (i) the marks for the exam and two coursework components (individually undertaken laboratory skills, and a team/group project on health communication), with the marks being compared by Students t-test, (ii) any association between these marks was determined by regression line analysis, and (iii) modelling was undertaken to determine the effects of changing the allocation of marks on passing and failing rates. Students in nursing who completed a bioscience course had much lower marks in the exam than the coursework. Regression line analysis of the marks in the exam versus combined coursework showed (a) a poor line fit and (b) the correlation coefficient was moderate (r = 0.51), for the individual laboratory skills vs. exam was moderate (r = 0.49), but only weak for the group project on health communication vs. exam (r = 0.25). A high percentage of students passed the course (97%). Modelling showed that increasing the marks for the exam decreased the number of students passing the course to as few as 57%. The allocation of marks determines the percentage of students in nursing who pass courses, regardless of the type of coursework. The students in nursing in the bioscience course, who pass the course based on marks from coursework, but not the examination component, may not have the necessary knowledge to continue their program of study. Thus, requiring students in nursing to pass exams should be given further consideration.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Richardson JTE. Coursework versus examinations in end-of-module assessment: a literature review. Assess Eval High Educ. 2015;40:439–55.
Sander P, Stevension K, King M, Coates D. University students’ expectations of teaching. Stud High Educ. 2000;25:309–23.
Trumbull M, Lash A. Understanding formative assessment: insights fromlearning theory and measurement theory. San Francisco: WestEd; 2013. https://www.wested.org/online_pubs/resource1307.pdf Accessed 6 February 2023.
Chansarkar BA, Raut-Roy U. Student performance under different assessment situations. Assess Eval High Educ. 1987;12:115–22.
Gibbs G, Lucas L. Coursework, assessment, class size and student performance: 1984-94. J Furth High Educ. 1997;21:183–92.
Bridges P, Cooper A, Evanso P, Haines C, Jenkins D, Scurry D, et al. Coursework marks, examination marks low: discuss. Assess Eval High Educ. 2002;27:35–48.
Simonite V. The impact of coursework on degree classifications and the performance of individual students.Assess Eval High Educ. 2003;28;459 – 70.
Murdan S. Exploring relationships between course and examination marks: a study from one school of pharmacy. Pharmac Educ. 2005;5:97–110.
Doggrell SA. Descriptive study of how proportioning marks determines the performance of nursing students in a pharmacology course. BMC Nurs. 19;2020:112.
RMIT University. Course Title: Introduction to Human Biosciences. http://www1.rmit.edu.au/courses/053044 Accessed 29th April 2022
Edith Cowan University. Handbook: Unit information. Health Science 1. https://www.ecu.edu.au/handbook/unit?id=SCN1111&year=2021 Accessed 18th July 2022
Monash University. Fundamental skills and knowledge for nursing and midwifery practice 1. https://handbook.monash.edu/2022/units/NUR1112 Accessed 29th April 2022
University of Tasmania. Courses & Units. Anatomy and Physiology for Health Care 1. https://www.utas.edu.au/courses/chm/units/cxa133-anatomy-and-physiology-for-health-care-1 Accessed 29th April 2022
The University of Queensland. Anatomy and Physiology for Nursing and Midwifery. https://course-profiles.uq.edu.au/student_section_loader/section_5/118800 Accessed 18th July 2022
Charles Darwin University. Unit Catalogue. Anatomy and Physiology 1. https://stapps.cdu.edu.au/f?p=100:21:P21_SEARCH_UNIT,P21_SEARCH_VERSION,P21_SEARCH_YEAR:SBI171,19,2022 Accessed 18th July 2022
Doggrell SA. How proportioning marks affects the performance of allied health students in a pharmacology course.Proc of ACSME; 2021:64–70. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/15472
Willcoxson LE. It’s not fair!”: assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. J Manag Educ. 2006;30:798–808.
Smith M, Rogers J. Understanding nursing students’ perspectives on the grading of group work assessments. Nurs Educ Pract. 2014;14:112–6.
Pocock TM, Sanders T, Bundy C. The impact of teamwork in peer assessment: a qualitative analysis of a group exercise in a UK medical school. Bioscience Educ. 2010;15:1–12.
Francis JE. Linking rubrics and academic performance. JUTLP 2018;https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.1.3
Doggrell SA, Schaffer S. Lack of recall of Bioscience knowledge by nursing students.ACSME; 2016:197–201. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/in.php/IISME/article/view/10734/11296
Doggrell SA. How proportioning marks affects the performance of allied health students in a pharmacology course. ACSME; 2021: 1–7 https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/15472