Folate‐related gene polymorphisms as risk factors for cleft lip and cleft palate

Wiley - Tập 82 Số 9 - Trang 636-643 - 2008
William H. James1, Anne M. Molloy2, Anne Parle‐McDermott3, James Troendle1, Lawrence C. Brody4, Mary Conley1, Christopher Cox1, Faith Pangilinan4, Donald P. Orr5, Michael Earley5, Eamon McKiernan5, Ena Lynn6, Anne Doyle6, John M. Scott2, Peadar N. Kirke6
1Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
2School of Immunology and Biochemistry, Trinity College, Dublin
3School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University
4Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services
5Dublin Cleft Centre, St. James's Hospital and Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin
6Child Health Epidemiology Unit, Health Research Board of Ireland

Tóm tắt

AbstractBACKGROUND:Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CLP) and cleft palate only (CPO) have an inherited component and, many studies suggest, a relationship with folate. Attempts to find folate‐related genes associated with clefts have, however, often been inconclusive. This study examined four SNPs related to folate metabolism (MTHFR 677 C→T, MTHFR 1298 A→C, MTHFD1 1958 G→A, and TC II 776 C→G) in a large Irish population to clarify their relationship with clefts.METHODS:Cases and their parents were recruited from major surgical centers performing cleft repairs in Ireland and a support organization. Data on risk factors, medical history, and DNA were collected. Controls were pregnant women from the greater Dublin area (n = 1,599).RESULTS:CLP cases numbered 536 and CPO cases 426 after exclusions. CPO mothers were significantly more likely than controls to be MTHFR 677 TT, OR 1.50 (95% CI: 1.05–2.16; p = .03). Log‐linear analysis showed a borderline association (p = .07). Isolated CPO case mothers were significantly more likely than controls to be homozygous for the MTHFD1 1958 G→A variant, OR 1.50 (95%CI: 1.08–2.09; p = .02). When multiple cases were added, both CPO cases and case mothers were significantly more likely to be AA (p = .02 and p = .007, respectively). The CLP case‐control and mother‐control analyses also showed significant effects, ORs 1.38 (95% CI: 1.05–1.82; p = .03) and 1.39 (95% CI: 1.04–1.85; p = .03), respectively.CONCLUSIONS:Associations were found for both CPO and CLP and MTHFD1 1958 G→A in cases and case mothers. MTHFR 677 C→T could be a maternal risk factor for clefts but the association was not strong. Because multiple comparisons were made, these findings require additional investigation. Given the known association between MTHFD1 1958 G→A and NTDs, these findings should be explored in more detail. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/ajmg.10496

10.1002/ajmg.a.32162

10.1086/344213

10.1002/bdra.20210

10.1002/ajmg.a.31462

10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1645

10.1542/peds.104.6.e66

10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199606)53:6<345::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-Z

10.1038/ng0595-111

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19991119)87:2<197::AID-AJMG15>3.0.CO;2-M

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008710

10.1002/1096-9926(200102)63:2<79::AID-TERA1013>3.0.CO;2-3

10.1093/aje/kwg097

10.1597/1545-1569(2001)038<0076:OCAVS>2.0.CO;2

10.1002/humu.9411

10.1002/1096-8628(20010201)98:4<357::AID-AJMG1108>3.0.CO;2-F

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990903)86:1<71::AID-AJMG14>3.0.CO;2-Y

10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00618.x

10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00428.x

10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201603

10.1007/s10038-003-0008-4

10.1136/jmg.39.5.368

10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00495-5

10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92778-6

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981116)80:3<196::AID-AJMG2>3.0.CO;2-V

10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990702)85:1<84::AID-AJMG15>3.0.CO;2-V

10.1136/jmg.40.5.e64

10.1002/bdra.20063

Spielman RS, 1993, Transmission Test for Linkage Disequilibrium: The Insulin Gene Region and Insulin‐dependent Diabetes Mellitus (IDDM), Am J Hum Genet, 52, 506

10.1002/tera.1420510205

10.1086/301825

10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.036

10.1093/aje/kwg005

10.1002/ajmg.a.31684

10.1002/ajmg.a.30705

10.1086/301802

10.1002/bdra.20319