Focus Groups

Annual Review of Sociology - Tập 22 Số 1 - Trang 129-152 - 1996
David L. Morgan1
1Institute on Aging, School of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 97201

Tóm tắt

Over the past decade, focus groups and group interviews have reemerged as a popular technique for gathering qualitative data, both among sociologists and across a wide range of academic and applied research areas. Focus groups are currently used as both a self-contained method and in combination with surveys and other research methods, most notably individual, in-depth interviews. Comparisons between focus groups and both surveys and individual interviews help to show the specific advantages and disadvantages of group interviews, concentrating on the role of the group in producing interaction and the role of the moderator in guiding this interaction. The advantages of focus groups can be maximized through careful attention to research design issues at both the project and the group level. Important future directions include: the development of standards for reporting focus group research, more methodological research on focus groups, more attention to data analysis issues, and more engagement with the concerns of the research participants.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.17730/humo.54.1.x102372362631282

Albrecht TL, Johnson GM, Walther JB. 1993. Understanding communication processes in focus groups. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 51–64

10.1177/109019818701400404

10.1177/0193841X9201600206

Bobo L, 1995, Res. Sociol. Work, 5, 45

Bogardus ES, 1926, J. Appl. Sociol., 10, 372

10.1177/105381519201600404

Bryant CA, 1990, Natl. Assoc. Pract. Anthropol. Bull., 39, 1

10.4324/9780203410028

10.1177/002194369102800105

10.1111/j.1533-8525.1992.tb00362.x

Carey MA. 1994.The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing and interpreting focus group research.InCritical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, ed. J Morse, pp. 225–41. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

10.1177/104973239500500401

10.1177/104973239400400108

Crabtree BF, Yanoshik MK, Miller WL, O'Connor PJ. 1993. Selecting individual or group interviews. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 137–49

Delli Carpini MX, 1994, Res. Micropolit., 4, 57

Diamond E, 1992, The Spot: The Rise of Political Advertising on Television.

10.1093/geront/34.2.235

10.2307/3151525

10.1177/0193841X9501900104

10.2307/1965654

10.4135/9781412985925

10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-M

Fuller TD, Edwards JN, Vorakitphokatorn S, Sermsri S. 1993. Using focus groups to adapt survey instruments to new populations: experience from a developing country. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 89–104

Gamson WA, 1992, Talking Politics.

Goldman AE, 1987, The Group Depth Interview: Principles and Practice.

Greenbaum TL, 1988, The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research.

Harari O, 1990, J. Manage. Issues, 2, 267

10.2307/1318636

10.1177/0193841X9501900105

10.1177/109019819201900105

10.1007/BF00942247

Irwin J, 1970, The Felon.

10.1016/0277-9536(91)90247-A

Jarrett RL. 1993. Focus group interviewing with low-income, minority populations: a research experience. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 184–201

10.1525/sp.1994.41.1.03x0423g

10.1177/089443939100900204

10.1037//0003-066X.39.11.1297

10.1093/heapol/7.1.56

10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347023

Kitzinger J. 1994b.Focus groups: method or madness.InChallenge and Innovation: Methodological Advances in Social Research on HIV/AIDS, ed. M Boulton, pp. 159–75. New York: Taylor & Francis

10.1016/0277-9536(92)90305-A

Knodel J. 1993. The design and analysis of focus group studies: a practical approach. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 35–50

10.1007/BF00972028

Knodel J, 1987, Thailand's Reproductive Revolution: Rapid Fertility Decline in a Third-World Setting.

Krueger RA. 1993. Quality control in focus group research. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 65–85

Krueger RA, 1988, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research.

10.1080/09668139408412210

Laurie H. 1992.Multiple methods in the study of household resource allocation.InMixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research, ed. J Brannen, pp. 145–68. Brookfield, VT: Avebury

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1991.tb02971.x

10.1080/03634529009378794

10.2307/584828

10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Magill RS, 1993, J. Sociol. Soc. Welfare, 20, 103, 10.15453/0191-5096.2059

10.1007/BF02894427

10.1016/0277-9536(93)90202-F

10.2307/3172559

McQuarrie EF, 1996, The Market Research Toolbox.

10.1086/269057

Merton RK, 1956, The Focused Interview.

10.1086/219886

Mischler EG, 1986, Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative.

Montell FB. 1995.Focus group interviews: a new feminist method. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc., Washington, DC

Morgan DL, 1988, Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.

10.1093/geront/29.1.101

Morgan DL. 1992a.Designing focus group research.InTools for Primary Care Research, ed. M Stewart, et al, pp. 177–93. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Morgan DL. 1992b.Doctor caregiver relationships: an exploration using focus groups.InDoing Qualitative Research in Primary Care: Multiple Strategies, ed. B Crabtree, W Miller, pp. 205–30. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

10.4135/9781483349008

Morgan DL. 1993b. Future directions for focus groups. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 225–44

Morgan DL. 1993c.Focus groups and surveys. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc., Pittsburg, PA

Morgan DL. 1994.Seeking diagnosis for a family member with Alzheimer's disease. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc., Los Angeles, CA

10.1177/104973239500500411

Morgan DL, Krueger RA. 1993. When to use focus groups and why. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 3–19

10.1111/1467-9566.ep10832349

10.1177/104973239300300202

10.1080/00913367.1988.10673102

Nichols-Casebolt A, 1995, Soc. Work Res., 19, 49

O'Brien KJ. 1993. Improving survey questionnaires through focus groups. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 105–17

O'Connor PJ, 1992, J. Am. Board Fam. Practice, 5, 381

Orosz JF. 1994.The use of focus groups in health care service delivery: understanding and improving the health care experience. Presented at Qual. Health Res. Conf., Hershey, PA

Padilla R. 1993. Using dialogical methods in group interviews. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 153–66

Pies C. 1993.Controversies in context: ethics, values, and policies concerning NORPLANT. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., Berkeley

10.1525/sp.1993.40.4.03x0093o

Pollak M, 1992, Curr. Sociol./La Sociol. Contemp., 40, 1

10.1177/0193841X9401800605

Saferstein B. 1995.Focusing opinions: conversation, authority, and the (re)construction of knowledge. Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Sociol. Assoc., Washington, DC

10.1177/104973239300300306

Sasson T, 1995, Crime Talk: How Citizens Construct a Social Problem.

10.2307/1965653

10.2307/2096119

10.1177/104973239500500408

Staley CS. 1990.Focus group research: the communication practitioner as marketing specialist.InApplied Communication Theory and Research, ed. D O'Hair, G Kreps, pp. 185–201. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Stewart DW, 1990, Focus Groups: Theory and Practice.

10.2307/1965657

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00503.x

10.1177/1046496492234002

Templeton JF, 1987, Focus Groups: A Guide for Marketing and Advertising Professionals.

10.4135/9781452243641

10.1177/0193841X9101500207

10.1111/j.1467-954X.1994.tb00107.x

Wolff B, Knodel J, Sittitrai W. 1993. Focus groups and surveys as complementary research methods: a case example. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 118–36

Zeller RA. 1993a. Focus group research on sensitive topics: setting the agenda without setting the agenda. SeeMorgan 1993a, pp. 167–83

Zeller RA. 1993b.Combining qualitative and quantitative techniques to develop culturally sensitive measures.InMethodological Issues in AIDS Behavioral Research, ed. D Ostrow, R Kessler, pp. 95–116. New York: Plenum