Fluid flow increases mineralized matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner

Gregory N. Bancroft1, Vassilios I. Sikavitsas1,2, Juliette van den Dolder1, Tiffany L. Sheffield1, Catherine G. Ambrose1, John A. Jansen1, Antonios G. Mikos1
1Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, 6100 Main, Houston, TX 77005; Department of Biomaterials, College of Dental Science, University Medical Center Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; and Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas, 6431 Fannin Suite 6148, Houston, TX 77030
2Preclinical Translational Cancer Research

Tóm tắt

Bone is a complex highly structured mechanically active 3D tissue composed of cellular and matrix elements. The true biological environment of a bone cell is thus derived from a dynamic interaction between responsively active cells experiencing mechanical forces and a continuously changing 3D matrix architecture. To investigate this phenomenon in vitro , marrow stromal osteoblasts were cultured on 3D scaffolds under flow perfusion with different rates of flow for an extended period to permit osteoblast differentiation and significant matrix production and mineralization. With all flow conditions, mineralized matrix production was dramatically increased over statically cultured constructs with the total calcium content of the cultured scaffolds increasing with increasing flow rate. Flow perfusion induced de novo tissue modeling with the formation of pore-like structures in the scaffolds and enhanced the distribution of cells and matrix throughout the scaffolds. These results represent reporting of the long-term effects of fluid flow on primary differentiating osteoblasts and indicate that fluid flow has far-reaching effects on osteoblast differentiation and phenotypic expression in vitro . Flow perfusion culture permits the generation and study of a 3D, actively modeled, mineralized matrix and can therefore be a valuable tool for both bone biology and tissue engineering.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2106/00004623-199508000-00019

10.1096/fasebj.9.5.7896017

10.1152/ajpcell.1997.273.3.C810

R Smalt, F T Mitchell, R L Howard, T J Chambers Am J Phys 273, E751–E758 (1997).

C T Hung, S R Pollack, T M Reilly, C T Brighton Clin Orthop 313, 256–269 (1995).

10.1074/jbc.M009846200

10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00231-1

10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.1.E171

10.1152/ajpendo.1996.271.1.E205

10.1115/1.1287161

10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.5.C989

10.1152/ajpcell.1998.275.6.C1591

10.1002/jcp.1041430113

10.1074/jbc.M003795200

10.1210/endo.138.3.4999

10.1038/269080a0

10.1016/0026-2862(88)90084-2

10.1097/00003086-199603000-00035

10.1096/fasebj.13.9001.s101

10.1002/jor.1100010105

10.1016/0021-9290(84)90094-0

10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00114-6

10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.12.2118

10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00280-5

10.1038/79439

10.1126/science.1064829

10.1210/endo.136.2.7530647

10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.9.1731

10.1177/10454411920030030501

10.1007/BF00225804

P Fante, M S Kindy, S Mohaparta, J Klein, G Colombo, H H Malluche Am J Physiol 263, E1113–E1118 (1992).

10.1016/0030-4220(92)90218-F

10.1089/10763270152436436

10.1111/j.1432-0436.1988.tb00804.x

10.3109/03008208909002412

J B Lian, G S Stein J Oral Implant 19, 95–105 (1993).

10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.45

10.1002/bit.260430706

10.1152/ajpcell.1991.261.3.C428