Floridi and Spinoza on global information ethics
Tóm tắt
Floridi’s ontocentric ethics is compared with Spinoza’s ethical and metaphysical system as found in the Ethics. Floridi’s is a naturalistic ethics where he argues that an action is right or wrong primarily because the action does decrease the ‹entropy’ of the infosphere or not. An action that decreases the amount entropy of the infosphere is a good one, and one that increases it is a bad one. For Floridi, ‹entropy’ refers to destruction or loss of diversity of the infosphere, or the total reality consisting of informational objects. The similarity with Spinoza is that both philosophers refer to basic reality as a foundation for normative judgments. Hence they are both ethical naturalists. An interpretation of both Floridi and Spinoza is offered that might begin to solve the basic problems for any naturalistic ethics. The problems are how a value theory that is based on metaphysics could maintain normative force and how normative force could be justified when there appear to be widely differing metaphysical systems according to the many cultural traditions. I argue that in Spinoza’s and presumably in Floridi’s system, there is no separation between the normative and the natural from the beginning. Normative terms derive their validity from their role in referring to action that leads to a richer and fuller reality. As for the second problem, Spinoza’s God is such that He cannot be fully described by mere finite intellect. What this translates to the contemporary situation of information ethics is that there are always bound to be many different ways of conceptualizing one and the same reality, and it is the people’s needs, goals and desires that often dictate how the conceptualizing is done. However, when different groups of people interact, these systems become calibrated with one another. This is possible because they already belong to the same reality.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Burk, Dan. (2007). Privacy and property in the global datasphere. In Soraj Hongladarom, & Charles Ess (Eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives (pp. 94–107). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference
Davidson, Donald. (2001). On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. In Donald Davidson (Ed.), Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Eisenberg, Paul. (1977). Is Spinoza an ethical naturalist? Philosophia, 7(1), 107–133
Ess, Charles. (2007). Information ethics: Local approaches, global potentials? or: Divergence, convergence, and ethical pluralism as maintaining distinctive cultural identities and (quasi?)-universal ethics. In Soraj Hongladarom (Ed.), Computing and Philosophy in Asia. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Floridi, Luciano. (2001). Information ethics: an environmental approach to the digital divide. Philosophy in the Contemporary World, 9(1), 1–7
Floridi, Luciano. (2002). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 287–304
Luciano Floridi. The Philosophy of Presence: From Epistemic Failure to Successful Observation. Presence, 4(6): 656–667, 2005.
Floridi, Luciano. (2007). Global information ethics: the importance of being environmentally earnest. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 3(3), 1–11
Floridi, Luciano, & Sanders, J. W. (2002). Mapping the foundationalist debate in computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 1–9
Hampshire, Stuart. (2005). Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hongladarom, Soraj. (2007). Analysis and justification of privacy from a Buddhist perspective. In Soraj Hongladarom, & Charles Ess (Eds.), Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives (pp. 108–122). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference
Immanuel Kant. In Allen W. Wood, Trans. and editor, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 2002.
LeBuffe, Michael. (2007). Spinoza’s normative ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37(3), 371–392
Lü, Yao-huai. (2005). Privacy and data privacy issues in contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 7–15
Baruch de Spinoza. Ethics. In Edwin Curley, Trans. and editor, The Collected Works of Spinoza, Vol. 1, pp. 408–617. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985.