Floral guidance of learning a preference for symmetry by bumblebees
Tóm tắt
This study examines the mechanism underlying one way in which bumblebees are known to develop a preference for symmetric patterns: through prior non-differential reinforcement on simple patterns (black discs and white discs). In three experiments, bees were given a choice among symmetric and asymmetric black-and-white non-rewarding patterns presented at the ends of corridors in a radial maze. Experimental groups had prior rewarded non-discrimination training on white patterns and black patterns, while control groups had no pre-test experience outside the colony. No preference for symmetry was obtained for any of the control groups. Prior training with circular patterns highlighting a horizontal axis of symmetry led to a specific subsequent preference for horizontal over vertical symmetry, while training with a vertical axis abolished this effect. Circles highlighting both axes created a general avoidance of asymmetry in favour of symmetric patterns with vertical, horizontal or both axes of symmetry. Training with plain circles, but not with deformed circles, led to a preference for symmetry: there was no evidence that the preference emerged just by virtue of having attention drawn away from irrelevant pattern differences. Our results point to a preference for symmetry developing gradually through first learning to extract an axis of symmetry from simple patterns and subsequently recognizing that axis in new patterns. They highlight the importance of continued learning through non-differential reinforcement by skilled foragers. Floral guides can function not only to guide pollinators to the source of reward but also to highlight an axis of symmetry for use in subsequent floral encounters.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Avarguès-Weber A, Portelli G, Benard J, Dyer A, Giurfa M (2010) Configural processing enables discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees. J Exp Biol 213:593–601
Avarguès-Weber A, Dyer AG, Giurfa M (2011) Conceptualization of above and below relationships by an insect. Proc R Soc B 278:898–905
Brown MF, Sayde JM (2013) Same/different discrimination by bumblebee colonies. Anim Cogn 16:117–125
Chittka L, Raine NE (2006) Recognition of flowers by pollinators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:428–435
Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) (2001) Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Citerne H, Jabbour F, Nadot S, Damerval C (2010) The evolution of floral symmetry. Adv Bot Res 54:85–137
Clarke D, Whitney H, Sutton G, Robert D (2013) Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees. Science 340(6128):66–69
Culbert BM, Forrest JR (2016) Floral symmetry affects bumblebee approach consistency in artificial flowers. J Pollin Ecol 18:1–6
Dafni A, Kevan PG (1996) Floral symmetry and nectar guides: ontogenetic constraints from floral development, colour pattern rules and functional significance. Bot J Linn Soc 120:371–377
Dyer AG, Chittka L (2004) Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91:224–227
Endress PK (2001) Evolution of floral symmetry. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:86–91
Giurfa M (2004) Conditioning procedure and color discrimination in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Naturwissenschaften 91:228–231
Giurfa M, Núñez J, Chittka L, Menzel R (1995) Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 177:247–259
Giurfa M, Eichmann B, Menzel R (1996) Symmetry perception in an insect. Nature 382:458–461
Giurfa M, Dafni A, Neal PR (1999a) Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems. Int J Plant Sci 160:S41–S50
Giurfa M, Hammer M, Stach S, Stollhoff N, Müller-Deisig N, Mizyrycki C (1999b) Pattern learning by honeybees: conditioning procedure and recognition strategy. Anim Behav 57:315–324
Giurfa M, Schubert M, Reisenman C, Gerber B, Lachnit H (2003) The effect of cumulative experience on the use of elemental and configural visual discrimination strategies in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 145:161–169
Goulson D (2010) Bumblebees: behaviour, ecology, and conservation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gumbert A (2000) Color choices by bumble bees (Bombus terrestris): innate preferences and generalization after learning. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48:36–43
Horridge GA (1996) The honeybee (Apis mellifera) detects bilateral symmetry and discriminates its axis. J Insect Physiol 42:755–764
Knauer AC, Schiestl FP (2015) Bees use honest floral signals as indicators of reward when visiting flowers. Ecol Lett 18:135–143
Laverty TM, Plowright RC (1988) Flower handling by bumblebees: a comparison of specialists and generalists. Anim Behav 36:733–740
Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2009) Bumble-bees learn the value of social cues through experience. Biol Lett 5:310–312
Lehrer M, Horridge GA, Zhang SW, Gadagkar R (1995) Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns. Philos Trans R Soc B 347(1320):123–137
Leonard AS, Papaj DR (2011) ‘X’marks the spot: the possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Funct Ecol 25:1293–1301
Lunau K, Unseld K, Wolter F (2009) Visual detection of diminutive floral guides in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris and in the honeybee Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A 195:1121–1130
Macuda T, Gegear RJ, Laverty TM, Timney B (2001) Behavioural assessment of visual acuity in bumblebees (Bombus impatiens). J Exp Biol 204:559–564
Mazurek A, Bhoopathy RM, Read JC, Gallagher P, Smulders TV (2015) Effects of age on a real-world What-Where-When memory task. Front Aging Neurosci 7:74
Mirwan HB, Kevan PG (2014) Problem solving by worker bumblebees Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Anim Cogn 17:1053–1061
Møller AP (1995) Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2288–2292
Møller AP, Eriksson M (1995) Pollinator preference for symmetrical flowers and sexual selection in plants. Oikos 73:15–22
Møller AP, Sorci G (1998) Insect preference for symmetrical artificial flowers. Oecologia 114:37–42
Morawetz L, Spaethe J (2012) Visual attention in a complex search task differs between honeybees and bumblebees. J Exp Biol 215:2515–2523
Neal PR, Dafni A, Giurfa M (1998) Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:345–373
Nityananda V (2016) Attention-like processes in insects. Proc R Soc B 283(1842):20161986
O’Malley JJ, Arnone SJ, Ziegenfus F (1969) Non-differential reinforcement and discrimination learning. Psychon Sci 17:285–286
Orbán LL, Chartier S (2015) Unsupervised neural network quantifies the cost of visual information processing. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132218
Orbán LL, Plowright CMS (2013) The effect of flower-like and non-flower-like visual properties on choice of unrewarding patterns by bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 100:621–631
Orbán LL, Plowright CMS (2014) Getting to the start line: how bumblebees and honeybees are visually guided towards their first floral contact. Insect Soc 61:325–336
Orbán LL, Plowright CMS, Chartier S, Thompson E, Xu V (2015) Visual choice behavior by bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) confirms unsupervised neural network’s predictions. J Comp Psychol 129(3):229–236
Pellmyr O (1988) Bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) assess pollen availability in Anemonopsis macrophylla (Ranunculaceae) through floral shape. Ann Entomol Soc Am 81(5):792–797
Perreault MJ, Plowright CMS (2009) Facilitation of learning of a simultaneous discrimination between rotated patterns by bumblebees. Learn Motiv 40:234–256
Plowright CMS, Landry F, Church D, Heyding J, Dupuis-Roy N, Thivierge JP, Simonds V (2001) A change in orientation: recognition of rotated patterns by bumble bees. J Insect Behav 14:113–127
Plowright CMS, Evans SA, Leung JC, Collin CA (2011) The preference for symmetry in flower-naïve and not-so-naïve bumblebees. Learn Motiv 42:76–83
Pohl M, Watolla T, Lunau K (2008) Anther-mimicking floral guides exploit a conflict between innate preference and learning in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:295. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0661-x
Rodríguez I, Gumbert A, Hempel de Ibarra N, Kunze J, Giurfa M (2004) Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘beeholder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91:374–377
Ronacher B (1998) How do bees recognize visual patterns? Biol Cybern 79:477–485
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2012) Biometry, 4th edn. WH Freeman, New York
Srinivasan MV, Zhang SW, Witney K (1994) Visual discrimination of pattern orientation by honeybees: performance and implications for ‘cortical ‘ processing. Philos Trans R Soc B 343(1304):199–210
Stach S, Giurfa M (2005) The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees. Behav Brain Res 161:8–17
Thompson E, Plowright C (2016) Learned use of picture cues by bumblebees (Bombus impatiens) in a delayed matching task. Behav Sci 6:22. doi:10.3390/bs6040022
Ushimaru A, Hyodo F (2005) Why do bilaterally symmetrical flowers orient vertically? Flower orientation influences pollinator landing behaviour. Evol Ecol Res 7:151–160
West EL, Laverty TM (1998) Effect of floral symmetry on flower choice and foraging behaviour of bumble bees. Can J Zool 76:730–739
Wu W, Moreno AM, Tangen JM, Reinhard J (2013) Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings. J Comp Physiol A 199:45–55
Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV (1994a) Prior experience enhances pattern discrimination in insect vision. Nature 368:330–332
Zhang SW, Srinivasan MV (1994b) Pattern recognition in honeybees: analysis of orientation. Philos Trans R Soc B 346(1318):399–406