Flight Durations in Bumblebees Under Manipulation of Feeding Choices
Tóm tắt
Foraging bees spend less time flying between flowers of the same species than between individuals of different species. This time saving has been suggested as a possible advantage of flower-constant foraging. We hypothesized that the time required to switch flower type increases if (a) such switches are infrequent and (b) the bees need to decide whether to switch or not. Bumblebees were taught to forage on artificial feeders that were identical in morphology and reward schedule but differed in the color of their landing surface. In the first two experiments bees foraged alternatively between two feeders. In Experiment 1 the colors of the landing surfaces were switched every two or three visits, while in Experiment 2 they were switched every six or seven visits. In the third experiment, the bees were required to decide whether to make a color-constant or a color-shift flight. Intervisit time was defined as time elapsed between consecutive visits to feeders. When feeder colors were changed frequently (Experiment 1), we detected no difference between color-constant and color-shift intervisit times. When bees were repeatedly exposed to one color (Experiment 2), color shifts required a significantly longer time. When allowed to choose (Experiment 3), bees performed more color-constant flights than color-shift flights. Intervisit times were similar for color-constant and color-shift flights in this experiment. Intervisit times in Experiment 3 were significantly longer than in Experiment 2 and slightly but nonsignificantly longer than in Experiment 1. The results suggest that bees indeed save time though flower-constant foraging but that this time savings is a small (∼1 s/flower visit) under laboratory conditions, and appears only when switches between flower types are infrequent. The time saved may be more significant over long foraging trips, and when morphological differences between flower species are large, as often happens under natural conditions, providing a selective advantage to flower-constant foraging.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bernays, E. A. (1999). Plasticity and the problem of choice in food selection. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 944-951.
Bernays, E. A., and Funk, D. J. (1999). Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: Experiments with aphids. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 151-156.
Blough, P. M. (1989). Attentional priming and visual search in pigeons. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 15: 358-365.
Chittka, L., Geiger, K., and Kunze, J. (1995). The influences of landmarks on distance estimation of honeybees. Anim. Behav. 50: 23-31.
Chittka, L., Gumbert, A., and Kunze, J. (1997). Foraging dynamics of bumblebees: correlates of movements within and between plant species. Behav. Ecol. 8: 239-249.
Chittka, L., Thomson, J. D., and Waser, N. M. (1999). Flower constancy, insect psychology and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86: 361-377.
Darwin, C. (1876). Cross and Self-Fertilization in the Vegetable Kingdom, Murray, London.
Dukas, R. (1995). Transfer and interference in bumblebee learning. Anim. Behav. 49: 1481-1490.
Dukas, R., and Ellner, S. (1993). Information processing and prey detection. Ecology 74: 1337-1346.
Dukas, R., and Kamil, A. C. (2001). Limited attention: the constraint underlying search image. Behav. Ecol. 12: 192-199.
Gegear, R. J., and Laverty, T. M. (1995). Effect of flower complexity on relearning flower-handling skills in bumblebees. Can. J. Zool. 73: 2052-2058.
Gendron, R. P. (1986). Searching for cryptic prey: Evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail. Anim. Behav. 34: 898-912.
Giurfa, M. (1993). The repellent scent-mark of the honeybee Apis mellifera ligustica and its role as communications cue during foraging. Insectes. Soc. 40: 59-67.
Goulson, D. (2000). Are insects flower constant because they use search images to find flowers? Oikos 88: 547-552.
Goulson, D., Ollerton, J., and Sluman, C. (1997). Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: When to switch? Anim. Behav. 53: 1009-1016.
Greggers, U., and Menzel, R. (1993). Memory dynamics and foraging strategies of honeybees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 17-29.
Heinrich, B. (1976). The foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 105-128.
Hills, P. S. M., Wells, P. H., and Wells, H. (1997). Spontaneous flower constancy and learning in honey bees as a function of colour. Anim. Behav. 54: 615-627.
Keasar, T. (2000). The spatial distribution of non-rewarding artificial flowers affects pollinator attraction. Anim. Behav. 60: 639-646.
Keasar, T., Motro, U., Shur, Y. and Shmida, A. (1996). Overnight memory retention of foraging bumblebees in imperfect. Anim. Behav. 52: 95-104.
Keasar, T., Bilu, Y., Motro, U., and Shmida, A. (1997). Foraging choices of bumblebees on equally-rewarding artificial flowers of different colors. Israel J. Plant Sci. 45: 219-229.
Kunin, W. E. (1993). Sex and the single mustard—Population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed set. Ecology 74: 2145-2160.
Laverty, T. M. (1994a). Bumblebee learning and flower morphology. Anim. Behav. 47: 531-545.
Laverty, T. M. (1994b). Costs to foraging bumblebees of switching plant species. Can. J. Zool. 72: 43-47.
Lawrence, E. S. (1985). Evidence for search image in blackbirds (Turdus merula L): Short-term learning. Anim. Behav. 33: 929-937.
Lewis, A. C. (1986). Memory constraints and flower choice in Pieris rapae. Science 232: 863-865.
Lewis, A. C. (1989). Flower visit constancy in Pieris rapae, the cabbage butterfly. J. Anim. Ecol. 58: 1-13.
Marden, J. H., and Waddington, K. D. (1981). Floral choices by honeybees in relation to the relative distances to flowers. Physiol. Entomol. 6: 431-435.
Menzel, R. (1982). Short-term memory in the honey bee. In The Biology of Social Insects, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 356-359.
Osborne, J. L., Clark, S. J., Morris, R. J., Williams, I. H., Riley, J. R., Smith, A. D., Reynolds, D. R., and Edwards, A. S. (1999). A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar. J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 519-533.
Reid, P. J., and Shettleworth, S. J. (1992). Detection of cryptic prey: Search image or search rate? J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 18: 273-286.
Spaethe, J., Tautz, J., and Chittka, L. (2001). Visual constraints in foraging bumblebees: Flower size and color affect search time and flight behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 3888-3903.
Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. H. (1981). Principles and Procedures of Statistics, a Biometrical Approach, McGraw–Hill, New York.
Stout, J. C., and Goulson, D. (2001). The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Anim. Behav. 62: 183-189.
Stout, J. C., and Goulson, D. (2002). The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 239-246.
Stout, J. C., Allen, J. A., and Goulson, D. (1998). The influence of relative plant density and floral morphological complexity on the behaviour of bumblebees. Oecologia 117: 543-550.
Svenson, O., and Maule, A. (1993). Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and Decision Making, Plenum Press, New York.
Tinbergen, L. (1960). The natural control of insects in pinewoods. Arch. Neerland. Zool. 13: 259-379.
Waddington, K. D. (1983). Floral-visitation-sequences by bees: Models and experiments. In Jones, C. E., and Little, R. J. (eds.), Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 461-473.
Waser, N. M. (1986). Flower constancy: definition, cause and measurement. Am. Nat. 127: 593-603.
White, D., Cribb, B. W., and Heard, T. A. (2001). Flower constancy of the stingless bee Trigona carbonaria Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini). Austr. J. Entomol. 40: 61-64.
Wilson, P., and Stine, M. (1996). Floral constancy in bumble bees: Handling efficiency or perceptual conditioning? Oecologia 106: 493-499.
Woodward, G., and Laverty, T. M. (1992). Recall of flower handling skills by bumble bees: A test of Darwin's interference hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 44: 1045-1051.
Zahavi, A., Eisikowitch, D., Kadman Zahavi, A., and Cohen, A. (1983). A new approach to flower constancy in honey bees. In Veme Symposium International sur la Pollinisation, Versailles, INRA, pp. 89-95.