Fixed sanction frameworks in the World Anti-Doping Codes 2015 and 2021: Can hearing panels go below the limits in the pursuit of proportionate punishments?

Jan Exner1
1Faculty of Law, European Law Department, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Andenas M, Andersen C (2012) Theory and practice of harmonisation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Baddeley M (2019) The extraordinary autonomy of sports bodies under Swiss law: lessons to be drawn. Int Sports Law J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00163-6

Costa J-P (2013) Legal opinion on the draft 2015 WADC. World Anti-Doping Agency. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/legal/legal-opinion-on-the-draft-2015-world-anti-doping-code

Costa J-P (2019) Legal opinion 2019 (expert opinion) on the World Anti-Doping Code. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/avis_2019_code_mondial_en.pdf

Craig P, de Búrca G (2015) EU law: text, cases, and materials, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

David P (2017) A guide to the World Anti-Doping Code. The fight for the spirit of sport, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Duffy J (2013) Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code: CAS jurisprudence and the need for a strict approach. Austral Dispute Resolut J 24(1):26–40

Duval A (2018) The “victory” of the court of arbitration for sport at the European Court of human rights: the end of the beginning for the CAS. Int Sports Law Blog. https://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-victory-of-the-court-of-arbitration-for-sport-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights-the-end-of-the-beginning-for-the-cas

Exner J (2018) Anti-doping and athletes’ rights under EU law: four-year period of ineligibility as disproportionate sanction? Int Sports Law J 17(3–4):128–138

Exner J (2019) Fixed sanction framework in the World Anti-Doping Code: can hearing panels go below the limits in the pursuit of proportionate sanctions? Charles University in Prague Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019/II/4: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3412346

Greene PJ, Vermeer R (2018) Why WADA should reclassify cocaine as a “specified substance”—the inequitable case of José Paolo Guerrero. Law in Sport (online), 19 December 2018. https://www.lawinsport.com/topics/sports/item/why-wada-should-reclassify-cocaine-as-a-non-specified-substance-the-inequitable-case-of-jose-paolo-guerrero#references

Houben J (2007) Proportionality in the World Anti-Doping Code: is there enough room for flexibility? International Sports Law Journal 12(1–2):10–18

Houlihan B (2003) Dying to win—doping in sport and the development of anti-doping policy, 2nd edn. Council of Europe

Janák J (2015) Proportionality of sanctions under the WADA Code: a case study from the Czech Republic. Law in Sport (online), 19 May 2015: https://www.lawinsport.com/blog/jiri-janek1/item/proportionality-of-sanctions-under-the-wada-code-a-case-study-from-the-czech-republic

Kaufmann-Kohler G, Malinverni G, Rigozzi A (2003) Conformity of certain provisions of the draft WADC with commonly accepted principles of international law. World Anti-Doping Agency. https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/legal/conformity-with-international-law

Kramer EA (2019) Juristische Methodenlehre, 6th edn. C. H. Beck München, München

Maxeimer J (2008) Some realism about legal certainty in the globalization of the rule of law. Houston J Int Law 31(1):27–46

Menski WF (2006) Comparative law in a global context. The legal systems of Asia and Africa, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Niggli O, Sieveking J (2006) Selected case law rendered under the World Anti-Doping Code. Jusletter 20:11

Petržela J (2018) Compliance assessment of sanctions for anti-doping rules violation with EU law. Master’ thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Law

Rigozzi A (2005) L’arbitrage international en matière de sport. Helbing and Lichtenhahn, Basel

Rigozzi A, Quinn B (2018) The Guerrero Doping Saga: proportionality questioned. Football Legal, pp 94–106

Rigozzi A, Kaufmann-Kohler G, Malinverni G (2003) Doping and fundamental rights of Athletes: comments in the wake of the adoption of the World Anti-Doping Code. International Sports Law Review, pp 39–52

Rigozzi A, Haas U, Wisnosky E, Viret M (2015) Breaking down the process for determining a basic sanction under the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code. Int Sports law J 15:3–48

Rouiller C (2005) Legal opinion on whether Article 10.2 of the World Anti-Doping Code is compatible with the Fundamental Principles of Swiss Domestic Law. World Anti-Doping Agency. https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/Jusletter_eng.pdf

Soek J (2006) The strict liability principles and the human rights of athletes in doping cases. TMC Asser Press, The Hague

Spera S (2017) Time for transparency at the court of arbitration for sport. Int Sports Law J. https://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/transparency-at-the-court-of-arbitration-for-sport-by-saverio-spera