First‐arrival traveltime tomography with modified total‐variation regularization

Geophysical Prospecting - Tập 65 Số 5 - Trang 1138-1154 - 2017
Wenbin Jiang1, Jie Zhang1
1Geophysical Research Institute, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026 P. R. China

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTFirst‐arrival traveltime tomography is a robust tool for near‐surface velocity estimation. A common approach to stabilizing the ill‐posed inverse problem is to apply Tikhonov regularization to the inversion. However, the Tikhonov regularization method recovers smooth local structures while blurring the sharp features in the model solution. We present a first‐arrival traveltime tomography method with modified total‐variation regularization to preserve sharp velocity contrasts and improve the accuracy of velocity inversion. To solve the minimization problem of the new traveltime tomography method, we decouple the original optimization problem into the two following subproblems: a standard traveltime tomography problem with the traditional Tikhonov regularization and a L2 total‐variation problem. We apply the conjugate gradient method and split‐Bregman iterative method to solve these two subproblems, respectively. Our synthetic examples show that the new method produces higher resolution models than the conventional traveltime tomography with Tikhonov regularization, and creates less artefacts than the total variation regularization method for the models with sharp interfaces. For the field data, pre‐stack time migration sections show that the modified total‐variation traveltime tomography produces a near‐surface velocity model, which makes statics corrections more accurate.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1088/0266-5611/10/6/003

10.1190/1.2742496

AnagawA. Y.andSacchiM. D.2011.Full waveform inversion with total variation regularization.Recovery‐CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention.

10.1088/1742-2132/9/2/138

Aster R., 2011, Parameter estimation and inverse problems

Bauschke H. H., 2006, Joint minimization with alternating Bregman proximity operators, Pacific Journal of Optimization, 2, 401

10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01664.x

10.1016/0041-5553(67)90040-7

10.1190/1.1442303

10.1190/1.1443198

10.1007/978-94-009-1740-8

10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04453.x

10.1137/080725891

HampsonD.andRussellB.1984.First‐break interpretation using generalized linear inversion.54th Annual International Meeting SEG Expanded Abstracts 532–534.

10.1190/1.1441501

10.4310/CMS.2006.v4.n1.a10

10.1093/gji/ggu393

10.1093/gji/ggv429

10.1093/gji/ggv047

LiuL. GaoL.andZhangZ.2016.A practical approach to improve the accuracy of travel time inversion.12th Middle East Geosciences Conference.

10.1007/s13137-012-0036-3

MaQ. FengZ. ZuY. LanY.andYangX.2016.First Arrival Traveltime Tomography with Near Surface Model Constraints.12th Middle East Geosciences Conference.

10.1137/040605412

10.1190/1.1444596

10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-F

10.1088/0266-5611/6/1/011

10.1190/1.3250266

10.1029/RG020i002p00219

Tikhonov A. N., 1977, Solutions of ill‐posed problems, V. H. Winston and Sons.

10.1109/83.679423

10.1137/1.9780898717570

10.1137/080724265

Ö Yilmaz, 2001, Tulsa: Society of exploration geophysicists, Seismic data analysis

10.1137/070703983

Youzwishen C. F., 2006, Edge preserving imaging, Journal of Seismic Exploration, 15, 45

10.1190/1.1444468

ZhangJ. YilmazÖ.andDaiN.2006.First‐Arrival TomoStatics and Residual Statics for Near‐Surface Corrections.CSPG CSEG CWLS Convention.

10.1190/geo2014-0361.1

10.1190/1.1436864