Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability?

Anon, 2010, Kansallinen metsäohjelma 2015

Anon, 2012, Metsänkäsittelymenetelmien monipuolistaminen – jatkotyöryhmän muistio. Työryhmämuistio MMM 2012:7

Anon, 2014, Valtioneuvoston metsäpoliittinen selonteko 2050

Anon, 2015, Kansallinen metsästrategia 2025

Anon, 2016

Arts, 2009, Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional approach to global forest governance, Forest Policy Econ., 11, 340, 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004

Arts, 2010, Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance, 57

Beland Lindahl, 2011, Future forests: perceptions and strategies of key actors, Scand. J. For. Res., 27, 154, 10.1080/02827581.2011.635073

Beland Lindahl, 2015, Theorising pathways to sustainability, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol.

Beland Lindahl, 2017, The Swedish forestry model: more of everything?, Forest Policy Econ., 77, 44, 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012

Brienen, 2015, Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink, Nature, 519, 344, 10.1038/nature14283

Donner-Amnell, 2000, Suomen metsäteollisuuden muodonmuutos?, 292, 4

Donner-Amnell, 2004, To be or not to be nordic, 179

Dryzek, 2005

Eräsaari, 2002

Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, 2014

Harrinkari, 2016, Stakeholder coalitions in forest politics: revision of Finnish Forest Act, Forest Policy Econ., 67, 30, 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.006

Hellström, 1995

Hellström, 2001

Huttunen, 2014, Stakeholder frames in the making of forest bioenergy legislation in Finland, Geoforum, 53, 63, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.006

Katila, 2016

Koskinen, 1985, Finland – a forest sector society?

Kostamo, 2012, Metsälain muutosehdotusten (17.8.2012) vaikutusten arviointi

Kotilainen, 2011, Transformation of forest policy regimes in Finland since the 19th century, J. Hist. Geogr., 374, 429, 10.1016/j.jhg.2011.04.003

Kröger, 2013, Globalization as the ‘pulping’ of landscapes forestry Capitalism's north–south territorial accumulation, Globalizations, 10, 837, 10.1080/14747731.2013.814433

Kröger, 2013

Kröger, 2014, The political economy of global tree plantation expansion: a review, J. Peasant Stud., 41, 235, 10.1080/03066150.2014.890596

Kröger, 2016, The political economy of flex trees: a preliminary analysis, J. Peasant Stud., 43, 886, 10.1080/03066150.2016.1140646

Kuisma, 1997, Green gold and capitalism: Finland, forests and the world economy, Historiallinen Aikakauskirja, 952, 144

Kuisma, 1999, We have no Rockefellers … but we have cooperatives, 9

Kyllönen, 2006, Conflict management as a means to the sustainable use of natural resources, Silva Fennica, 44, 687

Lawrence, 2007, Corporate social responsibility, supply chains and Saami claims: tracing the political in the Finnish forest industry, Geogr. Res., 45, 167, 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00448.x

Leach, 2007

Leach, 2010

Lehtinen, 2004, Introduction: northern forest regimes and the challenge of internationalization, 3

OECD, 2006

Ollonqvist, 2002, Collaboration in the Forest Policy Arena in Finland – from neo-corporatist planning to participatory programme preparation

Pappila, 2012, Reconsidering the role of public participation in Finnish forest planning system, Scand. J. For. Res., 27, 177, 10.1080/02827581.2011.635084

Patomäki, 2007

1992

Perri 6, 2005, What's in a frame? Social organisation, risk perception and the sociology of knowledge, J. Risk Res., 8, 91, 10.1080/1366987032000081213

Pülzl, 2014, Bioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses?, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 386, 10.1080/02827581.2014.920044

Pykälä, 2007, Implementation of Forest Act in Finland: does it protect the right habitats for threatened species?, For. Ecol. Manag., 242, 281, 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.044

Raitio, 2008, You can’t please everyone” – Conflict management practices,

Raitio, 2013, Discursive institutionalist approach to conflict management analysis – the case of old-growth forest conflicts on state-owned land in Finland, Forest Policy Econ., 33, 97, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.004

Raitio, 2014, The disappearing chain of responsibility legitimacy challenges in the political governance of Finnish Forest and park service, Land Use Policy, 39, 281, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.008

Rantala, 2003, Value positions based on forest policy stakeholders' rhetoric in Finland, Environ. Sci. Pol., 6, 205, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00040-6

2010

Reunala, 1999, Forests and Finnish Culture “There behind yonder wonderland…”, 228

Rämö, 2016, Kyllä se kasvaa takaisin

Saarikoski, 2013, Science and politics in old-growth forest conflict in Upper Lapland, Nat. Cult., 8, 53, 10.3167/nc.2013.080104

Sarkki, 2010, Social movements' pressure strategies during forest disputes in Finland, J. Nat. Resour. Policy Res., 2, 281, 10.1080/19390459.2010.487991

Sarkki, 2015, Why do environmentalists not consider compromises as legitimate? Combining value- and process-based explanations from Finnish forest controversies, Forest Policy Econ., 50, 110, 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.08.004

Sarkki, 2012, Neoliberalisations in Finnish forestry, Forest Policy Econ., 15, 152, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.11.003

Scoones, 2015, Transforming soils transdisciplinary perspectives and pathways to sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 15, 20, 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.007

Schön, 1994

Soimakallio, 2016, Climate change mitigation challenge for wood utilization – the case of Finland, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10.1021/acs.est.6b00122

Toivonen, 2016

Valkeapää, 2014, Values, fairness and legitimacy in the context of Finnish forest and nature conservation policy

Valkeapää, 2013, Citizens' view of legitimacy in the context of Finnish forest policy, Forest Policy Econ., 28, 52, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.01.004

Valkonen, 2013, Metsälain vaikutusten arviointi

WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987

Viitala, 2003