Finnish forest-based companies in transition to the circular bioeconomy - drivers, organizational resources and innovations

Forest Policy and Economics - Tập 110 - Trang 101936 - 2020
Annukka Näyhä1,2
1Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland
2University of Jyväskylä, School of Resource Wisdom, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams Amui, 2017, Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and future agenda toward a sustainable transition, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 308, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103 De Backer, 2015, Manufacturing or services – that is (not) the question: the role of manufacturing and services in OECD economies Barney, 2001, Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view, J. Manag., 27, 643 Barney, 2011, The future of Resource-Base theory: revitalization or decline?, J. Manag., 37, 1299 Baumgartner, 2017, Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization, J. Clean. Prod., 140, 81, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.146 Björkdahl, 2011, Organizational climate and capabilities for innovation: a study of nine forest-based Nordic manufacturing firms, Scand. J. For. Res., 26, 488, 10.1080/02827581.2011.585997 Bocken, 2014, A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, J. Clean. Prod., 65, 42, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 Boons, 2013, Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview, J. Clean. Prod., 45, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013 Branco, 2006, Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives, J. Bus. Ethics, 69, 111, 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol., 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Bull, 2015 Cashian, 2007 Collins, 1995, Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s, Harv. Bus. Rev., 1995, 119 Dangelico, 2016, Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going, Bus. Strateg. Environ., 25, 560, 10.1002/bse.1886 de Besi, 2015, Toward a bioeconomy in Europe: national, regional and industrial strategies, Sustainability, 7, 10461, 10.3390/su70810461 Denzin, 1970, Strategies of multiple triangulation, 297 Dosi, 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change, Res. Policy, 11, 147, 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 Eisenhardt, 2000, Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, Strat. Mgmt. J., 21, 1105, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E Eriksson, 2008 Esposito, 2018, Introducing a circular economy: new thinking with new managerial and policy implications, Calif. Manag. Rev., 5, 10.1177/0008125618764691 Fernández-Guadaño, 2018, Impact of corporate social responsibility on value creation from a stakeholder perspective, Sustainability, 10, 2062, 10.3390/su10062062 Forest-Based Technology Platform Gebert, 2003, The risks of autonomy: empirical evidence for the necessity of a balance Management in Promoting Organizational Innovativeness, Creat. Innov. Manag., 12, 41, 10.1111/1467-8691.00267 Ghisellini, 2016, A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, J. Clean. Prod., 114, 11, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 Grant, 2010 Groysberg, 2018, The Leader's guide to Corporate culture, Harv. Bus. Rev. Guba, 1985, 1985 Guest, 2012 Hamel, 1992, Harvard business review, May–June, 1992, 164 Hamel, 1994 Hansen, 2010, The role of innovation in the Forest products industry, J. For., 108, 348 Hansen, 2016, Responding to the bioeconomy: Business model innovation in the Forest sector, 248 Hansen, 2006, Current state-of-knowledge: innovation research in the global Forest sector, J. For. Prod. Bus. Res., 3, 1 Hansen, 2007, Innovativeness in the global Forest products industry: exploring new insights, Can. J. For. Res., 37, 1324, 10.1139/X06-323 2013 Hansen, 2014, Innovation insights from north American Forest sector research: a literature review, Forests, 5, 1341, 10.3390/f5061341 Helfat, 2003, The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles, Strateg. Manag. J., 24, 997, 10.1002/smj.332 Hetemäki, 2014 Hetemäki, 2017 Hillman, 2001, Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line?, Strateg. Manag. J., 22, 125, 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H Hock, 2015, The impact of organizational culture on a firm's capability to innovate the business model, R&D Manag., 46, 433, 10.1111/radm.12153 Hurmekoski, 2013, Studying the future of the forest sector: review and implications for long-term outlook studies, Forest Policy Econ., 34, 17, 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.05.005 Hurmekoski, 2018, Diversification of the forest industries: role of new wood-based products, Can. J. For. Res., 48, 1417, 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0116 Joensuu, 2018, Contradictory stakeholder expectations for sustainability reporting - a social contract theory approach Johnson, 2008 Kalliola Kauppinen Laaksonen, 2018, Mielipide: Pk-yritysten on panostettava markkinointiin - USA:ssa panostukset jopa viisinkertaisia, Talouselämä, 12, 2018 Lahtinen Markelova Evans, 2019, Sensing opportunities in dynamic markets: how to encourage all employees to take part, J. Bus. Strateg. McGahan, 2000, How industries evolve, Bus. Strateg. Rev., 11, 1, 10.1111/1467-8616.00143 Mikkilä, 2006 Ministry of Employment and Economy of Finland, 2014, Finnish bioeconomy strategy Morse, 2002, Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research, Int J Qual Methods, 1, 13, 10.1177/160940690200100202 Mousavi, 2018, Dynamic capabilities and organizational routines for managing innovation towards sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 203, 224, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.215 Näyhä, 2019, Transition in the Finnish forest-based sector: company perspectives on the bioeconomy, circular economy and sustainability, J. Clean. Prod., 209, 1294, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.260 Näyhä, 2014, Strategic change in the Forest industry toward the biorefining business, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 81, 259, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.04.014 Näyhä, 2014, New products outlook Näyhä, 2015, Services in the forest-based sector: unexplored futures, Foresight, 17, 378, 10.1108/FS-08-2013-0034 Nelson, 1982 Nidumolu, 2009, Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation, Harv. Bus. Rev., 82, 57 Nurmi, 2004 Ollikainen, 2014, Forestry in bioeconomy: smart green growth for the humankind, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 360, 10.1080/02827581.2014.926392 Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö (ministry of Education and Culture) Patton, 2002 Pelli, 2018, Services and industrial development: analysis of industrial policy, trends and issues for the forest-based sector, J. For. Econ., 31, 17 Pelli, 2018, Increasing role of services: trends, drivers and search for new perspectives Pinkard, 2016, Innovation in the forest industry: ready or not!, Aust. For., 79, 153, 10.1080/00049158.2016.1213622 Poesche, 2016, 77, 64 Rauter, 2018, Open innovation and its effects on economic and sustainability innovation performance, J. Innov. Knowl. Rikama Rogers, 2003 Rohrbeck, 2018, Corporate foresight and its impact on firm performance: a longitudinal analysis, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 129, 105, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.013 Roos, 2014, Innovation diffusion of new wood-based materials – reducing the “time to market”, Scand. J. For. Res., 29, 394, 10.1080/02827581.2014.931454 Salvato, 2017, The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities, Strateg. Manag. J., 39, 1728, 10.1002/smj.2703 Schaltegger, 2018, Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: differentiating ethical motivations, J. Bus. Ethics, 147, 241, 10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0 Schoemaker, 2018, Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership, Calif. Manag. Rev., 61, 15, 10.1177/0008125618790246 Shuen, 2014, Dynamic capabilities in the upstream oil and gas sector: managing next generation competition, Energy Strateg. Rev., 3, 5, 10.1016/j.esr.2014.05.002 Silverman, 2005 Sousa, 2014, Validation in qualitative research: general aspects and Specifities of the descriptive phenomenological method, Qual. Res. Psychol., 11, 211, 10.1080/14780887.2013.853855 Strauss, 1990 Strauss, 1998 Teece, 2007, Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strateg. Manag. J., 28, 1319, 10.1002/smj.640 Teece, 2018, Business models and dynamic capabilities, Long Range Plan., 51, 32, 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007 Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strateg. Manag. J., 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z Thomas, 2006, A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data, Am. J. Eval., 27, 237, 10.1177/1098214005283748 Toppinen, 2013 Toppinen, 2017, The European pulp and paper industry in transition to a bio-economy: a Delphi study, Futures, 88, 1, 10.1016/j.futures.2017.02.002 UNECE/FAO, 2011, European forest sector outlook study (EFSOS II), 107 Utterback, 1994 Varadarajan, 2017, Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 45, 14, 10.1007/s11747-015-0461-6 Vecchiato, 2010, Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 77, 1527, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.12.003 Wells, 2016, Economies of scale versus small is beautiful: a business model approach based on architecture, principles and components on the beer industry, Organ. Environ., 29, 36, 10.1177/1086026615590882 Wiebke, 2018 Williams, 2011, Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage, J. Manag., 37, 1480 Wohlgemuth, 2019, Dynamic capabilities and employee participation: the role of trust and informal control, Eur. Manag. J., 10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.005 Xavier, 2017, Systematic literature review of eco-innovation models: opportunities and recommendations for future research, J. Clean. Prod., 149, 1278, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.145 Zahra, 2002, Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension, Acad. Manag. Rev., 27, 185, 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995