Fi-Index: A New Method to Evaluate Authors Hirsch-Index Reliability

Man DWK, Tsang WSF, Lu EY, Tsang HWH. Bibliometric study of research productivity in occupational therapy and physical therapy/physiotherapy in four Western countries and five Asian countries/regions. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(6):690–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12608.

de Solla PDJ. Networks of scientific papers. Science. 1965;149(3683):510–5.

Wikipedia. (2021). Indice H. Retrieved from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indice_H. Accessed 15 Jan 2022.

Huang G, Fang CH, Lopez SA, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(3):410–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.010.

Sidiropoulos A, Katsaros D, Manolopoulos Y. Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks. Scientometrics. 2007;72(2):253–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1722-z.

Warner ET, Carapinha R, Weber GM, Hill EV, Reede JY. Considering context in academic medicine: differences in demographic and professional characteristics and in research productivity and advancement metrics across seven clinical departments. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1077–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000717.

Ruan QZ, Ricci JA, Silvestre J, Ho OA, Lee BT. Academic productivity of faculty associated with microsurgery fellowships. Microsurgery. 2017;37(6):641–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30145.

Semaan RW, Hazbon MP, Arias SA, Lerner AD, Yarmus LB, Feller-Kopman DJ, Lee HJ. Academic productivity of interventional pulmonology training programs. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(4):536–9. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-704OC.

Holliday EB, Jagsi R, Wilson LD, Choi M, Thomas CR Jr, Fuller CD. Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among US academic radiation oncology faculty. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):767–73.

Engqvist L, Frommen JG. The h-index and self-citations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23(5):250–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.009.

Bartneck C, Kokkelmans S. Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics. 2011;87(1):85–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0306-5.

Ferrara E, Romero AE. Scientific impact evaluation and the effect of self-citations: mitigating the bias by discounting the h-index. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2013;64(11):2332–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22976.

Garfield E. The History and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90.

Kosmulski, Marek. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index save time and works equally well as the original h-index. Retrieved from https://sci2s.ugr.es/sites/default/files/files/TematicWebSites/hindex/kosmulski2006.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2022.

Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006;69(1):131–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.

Jin BiHui, Liang LiMing, Rousseau R, Egghe L. The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index. Chin Sci Bull. 2007;52(6):855–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9.

Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics. 2010;82(2):391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5.

Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. q2-Index: Quantitative and qualitative evaluation based on the number and impact of papers in the Hirsch core. J Informet. 2010;4(1):23–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.06.005.

Jin, Bihui. (2007). The AR-index: complementing the H-index. Retrieved from https://sci2s.ugr.es/sites/default/files/files/TematicWebSites/hindex/Jin2007.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2022.

Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(46):16569–72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

Franceschini F, Maisano DA. Analysis of the Hirsch index’s operational properties. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;203(2):494–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.001.

Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel H-D. Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2008;59(5):830–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806.

Riikonen P, Vihinen M. National research contributions: a case study on Finnish biomedical research. Scientometrics. 2008;77(2):207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1962-y.

Katsaros D, Akritidis L, Bozanis P. The f index: quantifying the impact of coterminal citations on scientists’ ranking. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2009;60(5):1051–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21040.

Ajiferuke I, Wolfram D. Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study. Scientometrics. 2010;83(3):623–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0127-6.

Brown RJC. A simple method for excluding self-citation from the -index: the -index. Online Inf Rev. 2009;33(6):1129–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520911011043.

Coret M, Rok M, Newman J, Deonarain D, Agzarian J, Finley C, Hanna WC. Twitter activity is associated with a higher research citation index for academic thoracic surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110(2):660–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.075.

Evans P, Krauthammer M. Exploring the use of social media to measure journal article impact. AMIA Ann Symp Proc. 2011;2011:374–81.