Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Phụ nữ kiếm tiền nhiều hơn và bạo lực gia đình: Bằng chứng từ Australia
Tóm tắt
Chúng tôi khám phá mối quan hệ giữa thu nhập tương đối của các cặp đôi dị tính và tỷ lệ xảy ra cả bạo lực trong gia đình lẫn lạm dụng tình cảm. Sử dụng dữ liệu từ các cuộc khảo sát trên toàn xã hội ở Australia, chúng tôi phát hiện ra rằng những phụ nữ kiếm nhiều hơn các bạn đời nam của họ phải chịu đựng sự gia tăng 33% trong bạo lực từ bạn đời và tăng 20% trong lạm dụng tình cảm so với mức trung bình. Chúng tôi chỉ ra rằng mối quan hệ giữa thu nhập của vợ chồng tương đối và lạm dụng đối với nữ bạn đời được mô hình hóa tốt nhất bằng một biến nhị phân đại diện cho "phụ nữ làm trụ cột kinh tế." Phát hiện này khác với một số nghiên cứu trước đây chỉ xem xét bạo lực nghiêm trọng và thấy có mối quan hệ tiêu cực liên tục giữa thu nhập tương đối của các bạn đời nữ và lạm dụng. Thay vào đó, các phát hiện của chúng tôi gợi ý về một cơ chế liên quan đến chuẩn mực giới tính tạo ra bạo lực gia đình. Chúng tôi không tìm thấy mối liên hệ nào giữa thu nhập tương đối và lạm dụng đối với các bạn đời nam.
Từ khóa
#bạo lực gia đình #lạm dụng cảm xúc #thu nhập tương đối #phụ nữ làm trụ cột kinh tế #chuẩn mực giới tính #AustraliaTài liệu tham khảo
Adao R, Kolesár M, Morales E (2019) Shift-share designs: theory and inference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(4):1949–2010
Agüero J, Frisancho V (2017) Misreporting in sensitive health behaviors and its impact on treatment effects: an application to intimate partner violence. December 2017. IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-853. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103802 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103802
AIHW (2018) Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia (Cat. No. FDV 2), 2018. Australian Institute Of Health and Welfare, Canberra
Aizer A (2010) The gender wage gap and domestic violence. Am Econ Rev 100(4):1847–59
Aizer A, Dal Bo P (2009) Love, hate and murder: commitment devices in violent relationships. J Public Econ 93(3–4):412–428
Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):715–753
Anderberg D, Rainer H, Wadsworth J, Wilson T (2015) Unemployment and domestic violence: theory and evidence. Econ J 126(597):1947–1979
Angelucci M (2008) Love on the rocks: domestic violence and alcohol abuse in rural Mexico. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8(1):1–43
Antecol H (2000) An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates. Labour Econ 7(4):409–426
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 1–Main Structure and Greater Capital City Statistical Areas, July 2016. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 1270.0.55.001
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) Personal Safety Survey, Australia: User Guide, 2016. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 4906.0.55.003. Released 08/11/2017
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Survey of Income and Housing, User Guide, Australia 2017-2018. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 6553.0. Release 12/07/2019
Bartik TJ (1991) Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan
Bertrand M, Kamenica E, Pan J (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(2):571–614
Binder AJ, Lam D (2018) Is there a male breadwinner norm? The hazards of inferring preferences from marriage market outcomes. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research
Bobonis GJ, González-Brenes M, Castro R (2013) Public transfers and domestic violence: the roles of private information and spousal control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(1):179–205
Borusyak K, Hull P, Jaravel X (2022) Quasi-experimental shift-share research designs. Rev Econ Stud 89(1):181–213
Bowlus AJ, Seitz S (2006) Domestic violence, employment, and divorce. Int Econ Rev 47(4):1113–1149
Cameron AC, Miller DL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J Hum Resour 50(2):317–372
Campante FR, Chor D, Li B (2019) The political economy consequences of China’s export slowdown. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research
Caridad Bueno C, Henderson EA (2017) Bargaining or backlash? Evidence on intimate partner violence from the Dominican Republic. Fem Econ 23(4):90–116
Chin Y-M (2012) Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction? Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. J Popul Econ 25(1):175–200
Cools S, Kotsadam A (2017) Resources and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 95:211–230
Dai M, Huang W, Zhang Y (2021) How do households adjust to tariff liberalization? Evidence from China’s WTO accession. J Dev Econ 150
Dugan L, Nagin DS, Rosenfeld R (1999) Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: the effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies 3(3):187–214
Ericsson S (2019) Backlash: undesirable effects of female economic empowerment. Working Paper 2019:12, Lund University, Department of Economics
Ericsson S (2020) Backlash: female economic empowerment and domestic violence. Working Paper 2019:12, Lund University, Department of Economics
Erten B, Keskin P (2018) For better or for worse?: Education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10(1):64–105
Erten B, Keskin P (2021) Female employment and intimate partner violence: evidence from Syrian refugee inflows to Turkey. J Dev Econ 150:102607
Erten B, Keskin P (2021) Trade-offs? The impact of WTO accession on intimate partner violence in Cambodia. Rev Econ Stat 103(2):1–40
Felson RB, Messner SF, Hoskin AW, Deane G (2002) Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology 40(3):617–648
Finger JM, Kreinin ME (1979) A measure of ‘export similarity’ and its possible uses. Econ J 89(356):905–912
Foster G, Stratton LS (2021) Does female breadwinning make partnerships less healthy or less stable? J Popul Econ 34(1):63–96
Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Sorkin I, Swift H (2020) Bartik instruments: what, when, why, and how. Am Econ Rev 110(8):2586–2624
González L, Rodríguez-Planas N (2020) Gender norms and intimate partner violence. J Econ Behav Organ 178:223–248
Guarnieri E, Rainer H (2018) Female empowerment and male backlash. CESifo Working Paper No. 7009, July 2018 version
Hederos K, Stenberg A (2022) Gender identity and relative income within households: evidence from Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 24(3):744–772. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12477
Hidrobo M, Peterman A, Heise L (2016) The effect of cash, vouchers, and food transfers on intimate partner violence: evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8(3):284–303
Hyde-Nolan ME, Juliao T (2012) Theoretical basis for family violence. In: Fife RS, Scharger S (eds) Family Violence: What Health Care Providers Need to Know, Chapter 2. Jones & Bartlett Learning Sudbury, MA, pp 5–16
Inglehart R, Haerpfer C, Moreno A, Welzel C, Kizilova K, Diez-Medrano J, Lagos M, Norris P, Puranen EPB et al (2014) World values survey: round six - country-pooled datafile version, retrieved from: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvsdocumentationwv6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute
Joseph G, Javaid SU, Andres LA, Chellaraj G, Solotaroff JL, Rajn SI (2017) Underreporting of gender-based violence in Kerala, India: an application of the list randomization method. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8044
Macmillan R, Gartner R (1999) When she brings home the bacon: labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61:947–958
Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 28:155–162
Strube MJ, Barbour LS (1984) Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship: economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family 45(4):837–844
Tauchen HV, Witte AD, Long SK (1991) Domestic violence: a nonrandom affair. Int Econ Rev 32(2):491–511
Tur-Prats A (2019) Family types and intimate partner violence: a historical perspective. Rev Econ Stat 101(5):878–891
Tur-Prats A (2021) Unemployment and intimate partner violence: a cultural approach. J Econ Behav Organ 185:27–49
