Phụ nữ kiếm tiền nhiều hơn và bạo lực gia đình: Bằng chứng từ Australia

Journal of Population Economics - Tập 36 - Trang 2925-2965 - 2023
Yinjunjie Zhang1, Robert Breunig1
1Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Tóm tắt

Chúng tôi khám phá mối quan hệ giữa thu nhập tương đối của các cặp đôi dị tính và tỷ lệ xảy ra cả bạo lực trong gia đình lẫn lạm dụng tình cảm. Sử dụng dữ liệu từ các cuộc khảo sát trên toàn xã hội ở Australia, chúng tôi phát hiện ra rằng những phụ nữ kiếm nhiều hơn các bạn đời nam của họ phải chịu đựng sự gia tăng 33% trong bạo lực từ bạn đời và tăng 20% trong lạm dụng tình cảm so với mức trung bình. Chúng tôi chỉ ra rằng mối quan hệ giữa thu nhập của vợ chồng tương đối và lạm dụng đối với nữ bạn đời được mô hình hóa tốt nhất bằng một biến nhị phân đại diện cho "phụ nữ làm trụ cột kinh tế." Phát hiện này khác với một số nghiên cứu trước đây chỉ xem xét bạo lực nghiêm trọng và thấy có mối quan hệ tiêu cực liên tục giữa thu nhập tương đối của các bạn đời nữ và lạm dụng. Thay vào đó, các phát hiện của chúng tôi gợi ý về một cơ chế liên quan đến chuẩn mực giới tính tạo ra bạo lực gia đình. Chúng tôi không tìm thấy mối liên hệ nào giữa thu nhập tương đối và lạm dụng đối với các bạn đời nam.

Từ khóa

#bạo lực gia đình #lạm dụng cảm xúc #thu nhập tương đối #phụ nữ làm trụ cột kinh tế #chuẩn mực giới tính #Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adao R, Kolesár M, Morales E (2019) Shift-share designs: theory and inference. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(4):1949–2010 Agüero J, Frisancho V (2017) Misreporting in sensitive health behaviors and its impact on treatment effects: an application to intimate partner violence. December 2017. IDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-853. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3103802 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3103802 AIHW (2018) Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia (Cat. No. FDV 2), 2018. Australian Institute Of Health and Welfare, Canberra Aizer A (2010) The gender wage gap and domestic violence. Am Econ Rev 100(4):1847–59 Aizer A, Dal Bo P (2009) Love, hate and murder: commitment devices in violent relationships. J Public Econ 93(3–4):412–428 Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):715–753 Anderberg D, Rainer H, Wadsworth J, Wilson T (2015) Unemployment and domestic violence: theory and evidence. Econ J 126(597):1947–1979 Angelucci M (2008) Love on the rocks: domestic violence and alcohol abuse in rural Mexico. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8(1):1–43 Antecol H (2000) An examination of cross-country differences in the gender gap in labor force participation rates. Labour Econ 7(4):409–426 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016) Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS): Volume 1–Main Structure and Greater Capital City Statistical Areas, July 2016. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 1270.0.55.001 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) Personal Safety Survey, Australia: User Guide, 2016. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 4906.0.55.003. Released 08/11/2017 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) Survey of Income and Housing, User Guide, Australia 2017-2018. Technical report, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Catalogue number 6553.0. Release 12/07/2019 Bartik TJ (1991) Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan Bertrand M, Kamenica E, Pan J (2015) Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(2):571–614 Binder AJ, Lam D (2018) Is there a male breadwinner norm? The hazards of inferring preferences from marriage market outcomes. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research Bobonis GJ, González-Brenes M, Castro R (2013) Public transfers and domestic violence: the roles of private information and spousal control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(1):179–205 Borusyak K, Hull P, Jaravel X (2022) Quasi-experimental shift-share research designs. Rev Econ Stud 89(1):181–213 Bowlus AJ, Seitz S (2006) Domestic violence, employment, and divorce. Int Econ Rev 47(4):1113–1149 Cameron AC, Miller DL (2015) A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. J Hum Resour 50(2):317–372 Campante FR, Chor D, Li B (2019) The political economy consequences of China’s export slowdown. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research Caridad Bueno C, Henderson EA (2017) Bargaining or backlash? Evidence on intimate partner violence from the Dominican Republic. Fem Econ 23(4):90–116 Chin Y-M (2012) Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction? Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. J Popul Econ 25(1):175–200 Cools S, Kotsadam A (2017) Resources and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 95:211–230 Dai M, Huang W, Zhang Y (2021) How do households adjust to tariff liberalization? Evidence from China’s WTO accession. J Dev Econ 150 Dugan L, Nagin DS, Rosenfeld R (1999) Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: the effects of changing domesticity, women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies 3(3):187–214 Ericsson S (2019) Backlash: undesirable effects of female economic empowerment. Working Paper 2019:12, Lund University, Department of Economics Ericsson S (2020) Backlash: female economic empowerment and domestic violence. Working Paper 2019:12, Lund University, Department of Economics Erten B, Keskin P (2018) For better or for worse?: Education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10(1):64–105 Erten B, Keskin P (2021) Female employment and intimate partner violence: evidence from Syrian refugee inflows to Turkey. J Dev Econ 150:102607 Erten B, Keskin P (2021) Trade-offs? The impact of WTO accession on intimate partner violence in Cambodia. Rev Econ Stat 103(2):1–40 Felson RB, Messner SF, Hoskin AW, Deane G (2002) Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology 40(3):617–648 Finger JM, Kreinin ME (1979) A measure of ‘export similarity’ and its possible uses. Econ J 89(356):905–912 Foster G, Stratton LS (2021) Does female breadwinning make partnerships less healthy or less stable? J Popul Econ 34(1):63–96 Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Sorkin I, Swift H (2020) Bartik instruments: what, when, why, and how. Am Econ Rev 110(8):2586–2624 González L, Rodríguez-Planas N (2020) Gender norms and intimate partner violence. J Econ Behav Organ 178:223–248 Guarnieri E, Rainer H (2018) Female empowerment and male backlash. CESifo Working Paper No. 7009, July 2018 version Hederos K, Stenberg A (2022) Gender identity and relative income within households: evidence from Sweden. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 24(3):744–772. Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12477 Hidrobo M, Peterman A, Heise L (2016) The effect of cash, vouchers, and food transfers on intimate partner violence: evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8(3):284–303 Hyde-Nolan ME, Juliao T (2012) Theoretical basis for family violence. In: Fife RS, Scharger S (eds) Family Violence: What Health Care Providers Need to Know, Chapter 2. Jones & Bartlett Learning Sudbury, MA, pp 5–16 Inglehart R, Haerpfer C, Moreno A, Welzel C, Kizilova K, Diez-Medrano J, Lagos M, Norris P, Puranen EPB et al (2014) World values survey: round six - country-pooled datafile version, retrieved from: www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvsdocumentationwv6.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute Joseph G, Javaid SU, Andres LA, Chellaraj G, Solotaroff JL, Rajn SI (2017) Underreporting of gender-based violence in Kerala, India: an application of the list randomization method. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8044 Macmillan R, Gartner R (1999) When she brings home the bacon: labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61:947–958 Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 28:155–162 Strube MJ, Barbour LS (1984) Factors related to the decision to leave an abusive relationship: economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family 45(4):837–844 Tauchen HV, Witte AD, Long SK (1991) Domestic violence: a nonrandom affair. Int Econ Rev 32(2):491–511 Tur-Prats A (2019) Family types and intimate partner violence: a historical perspective. Rev Econ Stat 101(5):878–891 Tur-Prats A (2021) Unemployment and intimate partner violence: a cultural approach. J Econ Behav Organ 185:27–49