Feasibility of repeated ipsilateral anatomical pulmonary resection
Tóm tắt
This study aimed to elucidate the feasibility of repeated ipsilateral anatomical pulmonary resection. The subjects of this retrospective analysis were 50 patients who underwent ipsilateral anatomical pulmonary resection after major lung surgery. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of primary operation performed: a repeated anatomical pulmonary resection group (RA group; n = 24) and an anatomical pulmonary resection after wedge resection group (AW group; n = 26). We compared the perioperative outcomes of the two groups. Completion lobectomy was performed in 9 of the 24 patients (38%) from the RA group and adhesion of the pulmonary hilum was more severe in this group (P = 0.004). Although the operative time was significantly longer in the RA group (P = 0.030), there was no significant difference in the amount of blood loss (P = 0.217) between the groups. A significantly higher rate of severe postoperative complications was observed in the RA group (42%) than in the AW group (12%) (P = 0.024). None of the patients who underwent repeated surgery died within 90 days postoperatively. Although repeated anatomical pulmonary resection is a more challenging procedure than anatomical resection after wedge resection, it does not increase short-term mortality; therefore, it is a feasible treatment option.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
Ito H, Suzuki K, Mizutani T, Aokage K, Wakabayashi M, Fukuda H, et al. Long-term survival outcome after lobectomy in patients with clinical T1 N0 lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:281–90.
Flores R, Bauer T, Aye R, Andaz S, Kohman L, Sheppard B, et al. Balancing curability and unnecessary surgery in the context of computed tomography screening for lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:1619–26.
Keenan RJ, Landreneau RJ, Maley RH Jr, Singh D, Macherey R, Bartley S, et al. Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:228–33.
Hamaji M, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Nichols FC, Wigle DA, et al. Surgical treatment of metachronous second primary lung cancer after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:683–90.
Kamigaichi A, Tsutani Y, Fujiwara M, Mimae T, Miyata Y, Okada M. Postoperative recurrence and survival after segmentectomy for clinical stage 0 or IA lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20:397–403.
Kamigaichi A, Tsutani Y, Kagimoto A, Fujiwara M, Mimae T, Miyata Y, et al. Comparing segmentectomy and lobectomy for clinical stage IA solid-dominant lung cancer measuring 2.1 to 3 cm. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21:e528–38.
Kamigaichi A, Tsutani Y, Mimae T, Miyata Y, Ito H, Nakayama H, et al. Prognosis of segmentectomy and lobectomy for radiologically aggressive small-sized lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;58:1245–53.
Nishio W, Yoshimura M, Maniwa Y, Kitamura Y, Tane K, Takenaka D, et al. Re- assessment of intentional extended segmentectomy for clinical t1an0 non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1702–10.
Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, Nakajima R, Suzuki K, Aokage K, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0802/WJOG4607L): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399:1607–17.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Fedewa SA, Butterly LF, Anderson JC, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145–64.
Hattori A, Matsunaga T, Watanabe Y, Fukui M, Takamochi K, Oh S, et al. Repeated anatomical pulmonary resection for metachronous ipsilateral second non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162:1389–98.
Omasa M, Date H, Takamochi K, Suzuki K, Miyata Y, Okada M. Completion lobectomy after radical segmentectomy for pulmonary malignancies. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2016;24:450–4.
Takahashi Y, Miyajima M, Tada M, Maki R, Mishina T, Watanabe A. Outcomes of completion lobectomy long after segmentectomy. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;14:116.
Okada M, Tsutani Y, Ikeda T, Misumi K, Matsumoto K, Yoshimura M, et al. Radical hybrid video-assisted thoracic segmentectomy: long-term results of minimally invasive anatomical sublobar resection for treating lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14:5–11.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Puri V, Tran A, Bell JM, Crabtree TD, Kreisel D, Krupnick AS, et al. Completion pneumonectomy: outcomes for benign and malignant indications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1885–91.
Linden PA, Yeap BY, Chang MY, Henderson WG, Jaklitsch MT, Khuri S, et al. Morbidity of lung resection after prior lobectomy: results from the veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:425–31.
Crabtree T, Puri V, Timmerman R, Fernando H, Bradley J, Decker PA, et al. Treatment of stage I lung cancer in high-risk and inoperable patients: comparison of prospective clinical trials using stereotactic body radiotherapy (RTOG 0236), sublobar resection (ACOSOG Z4032), and radiofrequency ablation (ACOSOG Z4033). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:692–9.
Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, Mehran RJ, Louie AV, Balter P, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:630–7.
Timmerman RD, Paulus R, Pass HI, Gore EM, Edelman MJ, Galvin J, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer: findings from the NRG oncology RTOG 0618 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:1263–6.