Feasibility of perfusion and early-uptake 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a dual-input dual-compartment uptake model

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 39 - Trang 1086-1096 - 2021
Shaobo Wang1,2, Boqiao Li3,4, Pengfei Li5, Ran Xie6, Quanshi Wang7, Hong Shi1, Jianfeng He3,4
1Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
2PET/CT Center, First People’s Hospital of Yunnan, Kunming, China
3Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
4Yunnan Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
5Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China
6PET/CT Center, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming, China
7Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Tóm tắt

PET enables a concurrent evaluation of perfusion status and metabolic activity. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of perfusion and early-uptake 18F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a dual-input dual-compartment uptake model. Data from 5 min dynamic PET/CT and conventional PET/CT scans were retrospectively collected from 17 pathologically diagnosed HCCs. Parameters such as hepatic arterial blood flow (Fa), portal vein blood flow (Fv), total blood flow (F), hepatic arterial perfusion index (HPI), portal vein perfusion index (PPI), blood volume (BV), extracellular mean transit time (MTT) and intracellular uptake rate (Ki) were calculated. Fa, HPI, MTT and Ki images were generated and used to identify HCC. Compared with the surrounding liver tissue, HCCs showed significant increases in Fa, HPI, Ki and the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) (all P < 0.001) and significant reductions in Fv (P < 0.05) and PPI (P < 0.001). F, BV and MTT (all P > 0.05) did not differ significantly between HCCs and the surrounding liver tissue. Perfusion and early-uptake PET/CT increased the positivity rate of HCCs from 52.9% with conventional PET/CT alone to 88.2% with the combined method (P < 0.05). Perfusion and early-uptake PET/CT are feasible for diagnosing HCC and provide added functional information to enhance diagnostic performance.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. Kim SH, Kamaya A, Willmann JK. CT perfusion of the liver: principles and applications in oncology. Radiology. 2014;272(2):322–44. Chen J, Chen C, Xia C, Huang Z, Zuo P, Stemmer A, et al. Quantitative free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid: correlations with Ki67 proliferation status, histological grades, and microvascular density. Abdominal Radiology. 2017;43(6):1393–403. Lu RC, She B, Gao WT, Ji YH, Xu DD, Wang QS, et al. Positron-emission tomography for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(32):4682–95. Schierz JH, Opfermann T, Steenbeck J, Lopatta E, Settmacher U, Stallmach A, et al. Early dynamic 18F-FDG PET to detect hyperperfusion in hepatocellular carcinoma liver lesions. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(6):848–54. Wang SB, Wu HB, Wang QS, Zhou WL, Tian Y, Li HS, et al. Combined early dynamic (18)F-FDG PET/CT and conventional whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT provide one-stop imaging for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39(3):324–30. Bernstine H, Braun M, Yefremov N, Lamash Y, Carmi R, Stern D, et al. FDG PET/CT early dynamic blood flow and late standardized uptake value determination in hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. 2011;260(2):503–10. Etard C, Celier D, Roch P, Aubert B. National survey of patient doses from whole-body FDG PET-CT examinations in France in 2011. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;152(4):334–8. Frampas E, Lassau N, Zappa M, Vullierme MP, Koscielny S, Vilgrain V. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: early evaluation of response to targeted therapy and prognostic value of perfusion CT and dynamic contrast enhanced-ultrasound. Preliminary results Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(5):e205–11. Jajamovich GH, Huang W, Besa C, Li X, Afzal A, Dyvorne HA, et al. DCE-MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: perfusion quantification with Tofts model versus shutter-speed model—initial experience. Magn Reson Mater Phys, Biol Med. 2015;29(1):49–58. Mullani NA, Herbst RS, O’Neil RG, Gould KL, Barron BJ, Abbruzzese JL. Tumor blood flow measured by PET dynamic imaging of first-pass 18F-FDG uptake: a comparison with 15O-labeled water-measured blood flow. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(4):517–23. Mullani NA, Gould KL. First-pass measurements of regional blood flow with external detectors. J Nucl Med. 1983;24(7):577–81. Chandarana H, Block TK, Ream J, Mikheev A, Sigal SH, Otazo R, et al. Estimating liver perfusion from free-breathing continuously acquired dynamic gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(2):88–94. Kinahan PE, Fletcher JW. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31(6):496–505. Thirion JP. Fast non-rigid matching of 3D medical images. INRIA, RR-2547; 1995. Sourbron S, Sommer WH, Reiser MF, Zech CJ. Combined quantification of liver perfusion and function with dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;263(3):874–83. Freesmeyer M, Winkens T, Schierz JH. Contrast between hypervascularized liver lesions and hepatic parenchyma: early dynamic PET versus contrast-enhanced CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(7):664–8. Huppertz A, Haraida S, Kraus A, Zech CJ, Scheidler J, Breuer J, et al. Enhancement of focal liver lesions at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histopathologic findings and spiral CT–initial observations. Radiology. 2005;234(2):468–78. Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(1):205–17. Vanhuffel S, Chen H, Decanniere C, Vanhecke P. Algorithm for time-domain NMR data fitting based on total least squares. J Magn Reson, Ser A. 1994;110(2):228–37. Pilu M, Fisher RB, Fitzgibbon A. Direct least square fitting of ellipses. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1999;21(5):476–80. Komatsu D, Yamada A, Suzuki T, Kurozumi M, Fujinaga Y, Ueda K, et al. Compartment model analysis of intravenous contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography in hepatic hemodynamics: a validation study using intra-arterial contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Hepatol Res. 2018;48(10):829–38. Wu J, Zhao C, editors. Cooperation on the Monte Carlo rule: prisoner’s dilemma game on the grid. National conference of theoretical computer science. Springer; 2019. Hartung-Knemeyer V, Beiderwellen KJ, Buchbender C, Kuehl H, Lauenstein TC, Bockisch A, et al. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(5):290–4. Geist BK, Wang J, Wang X, Lin J, Yang X, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of different kinetic models for dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma with various, also dual-blood input function. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(4):045001. Winterdahl M, Munk OL, Sorensen M, Mortensen FV, Keiding S. Hepatic blood perfusion measured by 3 minute dynamic 18F-FDG PET in pigs. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1119–24. Samimi R, Kamali-Asl A, Geramifar P, van den Hoff J, Rahmim A. Short-duration dynamic FDG PET imaging: optimization and clinical application. Phys Med. 2020;80:193–200. Taouli B, Johnson RS, Hajdu CH, Oei MT, Merad M, Yee H, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: perfusion quantification with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(4):795–800. Ippolito D, Querques G, Okolicsanyi S, Franzesi CT, Strazzabosco M, Sironi S. Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT with perfusion imaging in the quantitative assessment of tumor response to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a feasibility study. Eur J Radiol. 2017;90:34–41. Sahani DV, Holalkere N-S, Mueller PR, Zhu AX. Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: CT perfusion of liver and tumor tissue—initial experience. Radiology. 2007;243(3):736–43. Sadato N, Tsuchida T, Nakaumra S, Waki A, Uematsu H, Takahashi N, et al. Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25(6):559–64. Karakatsanis NA, Lodge MA, Tahari AK, Zhou Y, Wahl RL, Rahmim A. Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(20):7391–418. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European association for the study of the L. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236. Murakami T, Kim T, Takamura M, Hori M, Takahashi S, Federle MP, et al. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology. 2001;218(3):763–7.