Fear in the Voting Booth: The 2004 Presidential Election
Tóm tắt
Every presidential election offers interesting questions for analysis, but some elections are more puzzling than others. The election of 2004 involves two linked and countervailing puzzles. The first is: How did President George W. Bush manage to win at all, avoiding the fates of George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter? The other is: Why didn’t he win by a more substantial margin than in his first election, as all reelected presidents since Eisenhower were able to do? On the one hand, in the wake of September 11, the president had approval ratings around 90% and the threat of terrorism remained a substantial concern through Election Day. This would seem to afford Bush an overwhelming advantage. On the other hand, the public’s views of the state of the economy and of the course of the war in Iraq were negative. We think that the juxtaposition of these questions will help to explain the outcome of the election and of the pattern of the results. Moreover, by unpacking our explanation of the vote into three policy-related issue components—economic retrospective evaluations, domestic policy views, and foreign policy views—we examine the way these preferences contributed to the electorate’s voting decisions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 619–630.
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., Diamond, M., Diskin, A., Levine, R., & Scotto, T. J. (2004). Strategic abandonment or sincerely second best? The 1999 Israeli prime ministerial election. Journal of Politics, 66(3), 706–728.
Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2006). Change and continuity in the 2004 elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Adams, G. D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718–737.
Aldrich, J. H., Griffin, J. D., & Rickershauser, J. (2005). The presidency and the election campaign: Altering voters’ priorities in the 2004 election. In M. Nelson (Ed.), The presidency and the political system (8th ed.). Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Bond, J. R., & Fleisher, R. (1990). The president in the legislative arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Edwards, G. C. (1989). At the margins: Presidential leadership of congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson/Longman.
Jacobson, G. C. (2005). Polarized politics and the 2004 congressional and presidential elections. Political Science Quarterly, 120(2), 199–218.
Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: Wiley.
Page, B. I., & Jones, C. C. (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties and the vote. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1071–1089.
Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2004). Roll call data and NOMINATE scores available at: http://voteview.com/dwnomin.htm.
Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., Borgida, E., & Sullivan, J. L. (1990). A social cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. A. Ferejohn, & J. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview.
Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.