Fault tree analysis improvements: A bibliometric analysis and literature review

Quality and Reliability Engineering International - Tập 39 Số 5 - Trang 1639-1659 - 2023
Mohammad Yazdi1,2, Javad Mohammadpour2, He Li3, Hong‐Zhong Huang4, Esmaeil Zarei5,6, Reza Ghasemi Pirbalouti7, Sidum Adumene8
1Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's , NL , Canada
2School of Engineering Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia
3Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
4Center for System Reliability and Safety University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu Sichuan P.R. China
5Department of Safety Science College of Aviation Embry‐Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott Arizona USA
6Department of Safety ScienceCollege of AviationEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University PrescottArizonaUSA
7School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
8School of Ocean Technology Marine Institute Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's NL Canada

Tóm tắt

AbstractFault tree analysis (FTA) is one of the most popular failure analysis techniques that reveal the potential pathways leading to systems or components failure. It has been widely employed in numerous sectors to understand how a system fails and is improved. However, the conventional FTA has been criticized due to a series of inherent shortcomings in the FTA state of the arts. Accordingly, scholars, engineers, and practitioners made their attempts to improve the FTA by dealing with its critical deficiencies over the last decade. However, a few works have been performed to review and synthesize the relevant studies on FTA improvement topics. Thus, the present study is aimed to carry out a systematic literature review of the state‐of‐the‐art theoretical and empirical findings concerning FTA improvement from 2011 to 2021 using the Scopus database collection. In this sense, an in‐depth investigation is conducted using statistical metadata analysis. This subject discusses frontier directions and development trends to reveal the research status. In addition, a bibliometric study is undertaken to ascertain the most productive and influential researchers, research centers, and hotspot fields. It also sheds light on the FTA shortcomings in the existing literature, the evolution in FTA improvement topics, and research opportunities. The outcomes of the present work highlighted that the annual publications on FTA improvement topics are significantly growing, especially after 2019. Besides, Jianxiu Wang, Yan‐Feng Li, and Yihuan Wang are the most productive, prolific, and highly cited authors worldwide; and Asia, particularly China, is the leading contributor in the FTA area. According to Bradford's law, one‐third of all publications (7995) in the field of FTA improvement have been published by 40 sources. Finally, “Decision‐making,” “Risk analysis,” “Uncertainty Analysis,” and “Bayesian Networks” are the four major hot topics integrated into improving the conventional FTA.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/9781118281116

10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.021

10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107827

10.1007/978-3-031-07430-1

10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111156

10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.026

10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109261

10.1007/s11668‐019‐00599‐w

10.1002/9781119377351

10.1007/s10479‐019‐03247‐6

10.1109/TR.2010.2046798

LiH SoaresCG.Reliability Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines Support Structure using Hierarchical Bayesian Network 2019. doi:10.3850/978‐981‐11‐2724‐3

10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.014

10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106196

10.1016/j.apor.2022.103187

10.1177/0954409711403678

10.1155/2020/3158468

10.1155/2022/6162829

10.1016/j.anucene.2016.02.024

YangX LyuD QueJ LiuY ZhaoS.Risk Analysis of Gasification Process of Nuclear Fuel Manufacturing Facilities Based on FTA 2021. doi:10.1115/ICONE28‐63648

10.1007/s11668‐017‐0305‐4

10.1080/10803548.2018.1454636

10.1080/00207543.2013.825744

10.1002/qre.2140

10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009

Adesina KA, 2022, Smart Decision Fuzzy‐Based Data Envelopment Model for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis BT ‐ Linguistic Methods Under Fuzzy Information in System Safety and Reliability Analysis, 151

IEC 61025., 2006, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), International Electrotechnical Commission

NASA, 2002, Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications, Handbook, U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NUREG‐0492, 1981, Fault Tree Handbook, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

Yazdi M, 2022, Step Forward on How to Treat Linguistic Terms in Judgment in Failure Probability Estimation BT ‐ Linguistic Methods Under Fuzzy Information in System Safety and Reliability Analysis, 193

10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.009

10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111433

10.1016/j.ress.2021.108295

10.1007/978-3-031-07430-1_10

10.1007/s13198‐016‐0563‐7

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.006

AbdoH FlausJM Monte Carlo simulation to solve fuzzy dynamic fault tree IFAC‐PapersOnLine.2016;49:1886‐1891. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.905

10.1080/15732479.2015.1053093

10.1007/s13198‐013‐0145‐x

10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.03.001

10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.058

10.1016/j.psep.2019.09.003

AslansefatK KabirS GheraibiaY PapadopoulosY.Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis 2020. doi:10.1201/9780429268922‐4

Omidvar M, 2022, Fuzzy Bow‐Tie Analysis: Concepts, Review, and Application BT ‐ Linguistic Methods Under Fuzzy Information in System Safety and Reliability Analysis, 13

10.1007/s10479‐018‐3083‐9

10.1080/00207543.2018.1471244

10.1080/07408170601091907

10.1016/j.ress.2020.106885

10.1007/s10479‐019‐03211‐4

Li H, 2022, Dynamic Decision‐Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL): Improving Safety Management System BT ‐ Advanced Decision‐Making Methods and Applications in System Safety and Reliability Problems: Approaches, Case Studies, Multi‐criteria Decision‐Maki, 1

10.1007/s11135‐021‐01179‐7

MohammadpourJ LeeA TimchenkoV TaylorR.Nano‐Enhanced Phase Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage: A Bibliometric Analysis Energies.15;2022. doi:10.3390/en15093426

10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.036

10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120649

10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064

S M, 2019, Research methods for business students

10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607

10.1016/j.ress.2022.108474

10.1108/01409170410784185

10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.004

10.1007/s40747‐021‐00451‐5

2004, P.. Black, Bradford's Law, i n Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures

10.1155/2018/8351679

10.1007/s11192‐009‐0146‐3

10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

10.1007/s11192‐006‐0144‐7

10.1016/j.psep.2015.07.005

10.1109/TII.2017.2695583

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074

10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.024

10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.002

10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.001

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.034

10.1007/s11668‐018‐0421‐9

10.1016/j.ress.2011.03.012

10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002

10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010

10.1109/TII.2014.2300338

10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002

10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.014

10.3390/s120100806

10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.227

10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.010

10.1016/j.ins.2011.08.030

10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.030

10.1108/GS‐09‐2015‐0054

10.3233/JIFS‐152372

10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.004

10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.008

10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022

10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003

10.1016/S0165‐0114(86)80034‐3

10.1109/2.53

10.1109/24.159800

10.1016/0165‐0114(90)90026‐3

10.1016/S0951‐8320(00)00077‐6

10.1016/j.psep.2012.01.005

10.1007/s00521‐020‐05537‐8

YuechunW Jing‐tingW.Risk management of financial holding company based on fault tree analysis 2009.

XiangcaiZ WenlingL.Research on Financial Loan Index Analysis and Risk Evaluation Based on FTA 2018:739‐744. doi:10.25236/ssehr.2018.154

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Tập 39 Số 5

1639-1659

Thông tin tác giả